---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4151/
---
(Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 7:44 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4151/#review13714
---
As part of this change I am adding *.gcno and *.gcna to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4151/#review13715
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- wdoekes
On Nov. 8, 2014, 6:29 p.m.,
On Nov. 6, 2014, 6:04 a.m., wdoekes wrote:
Isn't the better fix to disable coverage for the shadow compilation?
Corey Farrell wrote:
Probably. I have updated code but I won't have time to test until this
weekend. I'll update the review once I've had a chance to do some builds
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4151/
---
(Updated Nov. 8, 2014, 1:29 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
On Nov. 6, 2014, 5:04 a.m., wdoekes wrote:
Isn't the better fix to disable coverage for the shadow compilation?
Corey Farrell wrote:
Probably. I have updated code but I won't have time to test until this
weekend. I'll update the review once I've had a chance to do some builds
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4151/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24502
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4151/#review13701
---
Isn't the better fix to disable coverage for the shadow
On Nov. 6, 2014, 6:04 a.m., wdoekes wrote:
Isn't the better fix to disable coverage for the shadow compilation?
Probably. I have updated code but I won't have time to test until this
weekend. I'll update the review once I've had a chance to do some builds with
it.
- Corey
