---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4166/
---
(Updated Nov. 15, 2014, 2:37 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Nov. 13, 2014, 11:30 a.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
With the fix being made to the leaked bridge in Asterisk, is this change
still required? Does hanging up self.channels[1] not result in
self.channels[3] and the bridge being destroyed as expected?
Corey Farrell wrote:
Still
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4166/#review13745
---
With the fix being made to the leaked bridge in Asterisk, is
On Nov. 13, 2014, 11:30 a.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
With the fix being made to the leaked bridge in Asterisk, is this change
still required? Does hanging up self.channels[1] not result in
self.channels[3] and the bridge being destroyed as expected?
Still required, I'm guessing that
On Nov. 13, 2014, 11:30 a.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
With the fix being made to the leaked bridge in Asterisk, is this change
still required? Does hanging up self.channels[1] not result in
self.channels[3] and the bridge being destroyed as expected?
Corey Farrell wrote:
Still
On Nov. 13, 2014, 4:30 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
With the fix being made to the leaked bridge in Asterisk, is this change
still required? Does hanging up self.channels[1] not result in
self.channels[3] and the bridge being destroyed as expected?
Corey Farrell wrote:
Still
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4166/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: testsuite
