On Oct 29, 2014, at 2:45 PM, Ben Klang bkl...@mojolingo.com wrote:
On 10/28/2014 06:03 PM, Ben Langfeld wrote:
On 28 October 2014 19:47, Derek Andrew derek.and...@usask.ca wrote:
What is the alternative to the dial plan? Is everyone talking about getting
rid of the statements like:
exten
Il giorno Oct 30, 2014, alle ore 4:57 PM, Paul Albrecht palbre...@glccom.com
ha scritto:
On Oct 29, 2014, at 2:45 PM, Ben Klang bkl...@mojolingo.com
mailto:bkl...@mojolingo.com wrote:
On 10/28/2014 06:03 PM, Ben Langfeld wrote:
On 28 October 2014 19:47, Derek Andrew
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Paul Albrecht palbre...@glccom.com wrote:
On Oct 29, 2014, at 2:45 PM, Ben Klang bkl...@mojolingo.com wrote:
On 10/28/2014 06:03 PM, Ben Langfeld wrote:
On 28 October 2014 19:47, Derek Andrew derek.and...@usask.ca wrote:
What is the alternative to the
Hi,
I've been reading recent emails on the developers list and just wanted
to add my 2 cents:
While the AGI approach was never useful for my needs, I recently
finished 2 years of almost straight development time to develop a
full-fledged call answering solution and I would be VERY annoyed
On Oct 28, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Ben Langfeld b...@langfeld.me wrote:
On 28 October 2014 19:47, Derek Andrew derek.and...@usask.ca wrote:
What is the alternative to the dial plan? Is everyone talking about getting
rid of the statements like:
exten = s,1,
what is the alternative?
Remote
On 10/28/2014 06:03 PM, Ben Langfeld wrote:
On 28 October 2014 19:47, Derek Andrew derek.and...@usask.ca
mailto:derek.and...@usask.ca wrote:
What is the alternative to the dial plan? Is everyone talking about getting
rid of the statements like:
exten = s,1,
what is the alternative?
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Paul Albrecht palbre...@glccom.com
wrote:
None of said “discussion” ever happened on the lists nor was the broader
Asterisk community involved as far as I can determine. A parallel
“discussion” was started by a shill at AstiCon this year to begin to get
the
Not asking for unqualified promises about the future of Asterisk. Simply asking
for an acknowledgment of the obvious, that is, Asterisk without the dial plan
wouldn’t be Asterisk. The fact that one is not forthcoming raises a red flag
with respect to the future of Asterisk. Furthermore, adding
So. After all this I'm tired of hearing the same argument. I've decided
to take the other side.
I have seen the progression of Asterisk for the last 5+ years. I was at
Astricon when it was held in the DC area and the last one in Atlanta (I
wish you'd go back there instead of Vegas!).
I tried
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Phil Mickelson p...@cbasoftware.com
wrote:
So. After all this I'm tired of hearing the same argument. I've decided
to take the other side.
I have seen the progression of Asterisk for the last 5+ years. I was at
Astricon when it was held in the DC area and
On 28 October 2014 14:44, Russell Bryant russ...@russellbryant.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Phil Mickelson p...@cbasoftware.com
wrote:
So. After all this I'm tired of hearing the same argument. I've decided
to take the other side.
I have seen the progression of Asterisk
What is the alternative to the dial plan? Is everyone talking about getting
rid of the statements like:
exten = s,1,
what is the alternative?
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
On 28 October 2014 19:47, Derek Andrew derek.and...@usask.ca wrote:
What is the alternative to the dial plan? Is everyone talking about
getting rid of the statements like:
exten = s,1,
what is the alternative?
Remote applications based on APIs like ARI. This is the start of the
discussion,
I can't speak for anyone else, but my vision would be for an easy to use
application that would allow for all the options you now have and even
more. The major difference is that you wouldn't have to try to figure out
all the complexities of the current dialplan.
For example, you could have a
The reason the dial plan can never be deprecated is because Asterisk wouldn’t
be Asterisk without the dial plan. Sure, you could re-engineer Asterisk so that
it would be “better for a small select group of users at the expense of the
majority of community that use the product as designed for
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Paul Albrecht palbre...@glccom.com wrote:
The reason the dial plan can never be deprecated is because Asterisk wouldn’t
be Asterisk without the dial plan. Sure, you could re-engineer Asterisk so
that it would be “better for a small select group of users at
On Oct 23, 2014, at 1:58 PM, Kevin Larsen kevin.lar...@pioneerballoon.com
wrote:
From: Paul Albrecht palbre...@glccom.com
Seems like now is as good a time as any to raise these issues, in
fact, sooner is better than later because once developers start down
a path it’s very difficult
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Paul Albrecht palbre...@glccom.com wrote:
When Matt says deprecating the dial plan would be difficult and would take a
long time it seems to me he’s being evasive and misleading. He doesn’t say
it’s never going to happen and he doesn’t share whatever he thinks
On Oct 22, 2014, at 3:39 PM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Paul Albrecht palbre...@glccom.com wrote:
On Oct 22, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Paul Albrecht palbre...@glccom.com
On Oct 22, 2014, at 3:27 PM, Kevin Larsen kevin.lar...@pioneerballoon.com
wrote:
From: Paul Albrecht palbre...@glccom.com
Here’s a link to the minutes: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/
display/AST/AstriDevCon+2014
It has you saying: Leif: we're in a transition, moving from dialplan
On Oct 23, 2014, at 1:55 AM, Olle E Johansson o...@edvina.net wrote:
It is critical that a group of developers ask themself questions along
these lines - what if???
- What if we removed AGi and AMI?
- What if we made a pluggable PBX?
- What if we restarted working on a SIP channel?
-
Really? Shouldn’t something this major affecting the entire Asterisk community
get discussed on the lists? Any idea what Leif is talking about when he says
the community is in transition, moving from dial plan model to external
control.
--
Paul Albrecht wrote:
Really? Shouldn’t something this major affecting the entire Asterisk
community get discussed on the lists? Any idea what Leif is talking
about when he says the community is in transition, moving from dial
plan model to external control.
It was something Ben Klang brought
On Oct 22, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote:
Paul Albrecht wrote:
Really? Shouldn’t something this major affecting the entire Asterisk
community get discussed on the lists? Any idea what Leif is talking
about when he says the community is in transition, moving from dial
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Paul Albrecht palbre...@glccom.com
wrote:
On Oct 22, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote:
Paul Albrecht wrote:
Really? Shouldn’t something this major affecting the entire Asterisk
community get discussed on the lists? Any idea what Leif
On 10/22/14, 12:14 PM, Paul Albrecht wrote:
On Oct 22, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote:
Paul Albrecht wrote:
Really? Shouldn’t something this major affecting the entire Asterisk
community get discussed on the lists? Any idea what Leif is talking
about when he says the
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Paul Albrecht palbre...@glccom.com wrote:
The suggestion that Asterisk should consider deprecating AMI/AGI is “crazy
talk.” It doesn’t merit discussion and shouldn’t be on the agenda in the
first place. It’s completely impractical and can never happen.
27 matches
Mail list logo
