Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP Configuration Wizard (Was: Opinions Needed: PJSIP Outboud Registration with multiple server_uris)

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 12:39 PM, George Joseph wrote: > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Leif Madsen > wrote: > >> My gut tells me no, mostly because if you're using the realtime >> interface, you're most likely inserting the records programatically (which >> I believe is your point). >> > >> Of

Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP Configuration Wizard (Was: Opinions Needed: PJSIP Outboud Registration with multiple server_uris)

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Leif Madsen wrote: > My gut tells me no, mostly because if you're using the realtime interface, > you're most likely inserting the records programatically (which I believe > is your point). > > Of course having functionality in one method and not another is alway

Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP Configuration Wizard (Was: Opinions Needed: PJSIP Outboud Registration with multiple server_uris)

My gut tells me no, mostly because if you're using the realtime interface, you're most likely inserting the records programatically (which I believe is your point). Of course having functionality in one method and not another is always somewhat annoying, but in this case, I think the point of the

Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP Configuration Wizard (Was: Opinions Needed: PJSIP Outboud Registration with multiple server_uris)

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Mark Michelson wrote: > On 10/07/2014 05:57 AM, Joshua Colp wrote: > >> I'm down with proposal #2 but I have to ask: would this work with >> realtime, and how? >> >> > If you're going through the trouble of setting up realtime I wonder if you would get any benefit

Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP Configuration Wizard (Was: Opinions Needed: PJSIP Outboud Registration with multiple server_uris)

On 10/07/2014 05:57 AM, Joshua Colp wrote: I'm down with proposal #2 but I have to ask: would this work with realtime, and how? (In this response, I refer to the new configuration type as a "compound type" since I also refer to sorcery wizards, which are a different thing.) I'm thinking ab

Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP Configuration Wizard (Was: Opinions Needed: PJSIP Outboud Registration with multiple server_uris)

I'm down with proposal #2 but I have to ask: would this work with realtime, and how? -- Joshua Colp Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _

Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP Configuration Wizard (Was: Opinions Needed: PJSIP Outboud Registration with multiple server_uris)

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Leif Madsen wrote: > Agreed. I also much prefer the second proposal as it is more intuitive to > how you would expect the configuration to look. Templates ftw. +1 On the second proposal. -- Rusty Newton Digium, Inc. | Community Support Manager 445 Jan Davis Drive

Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP Configuration Wizard (Was: Opinions Needed: PJSIP Outboud Registration with multiple server_uris)

Agreed. I also much prefer the second proposal as it is more intuitive to how you would expect the configuration to look. Templates ftw. On 2 October 2014 13:45, Brad Watkins wrote: > As we talked about in #asterisk-dev, I like the proposal generally and > prefer the second style specifically.

Re: [asterisk-dev] PJSIP Configuration Wizard (Was: Opinions Needed: PJSIP Outboud Registration with multiple server_uris)

As we talked about in #asterisk-dev, I like the proposal generally and prefer the second style specifically. Just as a matter of eventual documentation, it'd be nice to see examples using a hierarchy of templates that shows how to minimize duplication of configuration. - Brad On Wed, Oct 1, 2014

[asterisk-dev] PJSIP Configuration Wizard (Was: Opinions Needed: PJSIP Outboud Registration with multiple server_uris)

This is a followup to the discussion we had in this thread... Opinions Needed: PJSIP Outboud Registration with multiple server_uris I started with wanting to allow multiple server_uris in a single registration object but w