On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Corey Farrell wrote:
>
> I was looking at reviews.reviewboard.org to see if anything was in the works
> to allow restricted reviews, I found
> https://reviews.reviewboard.org/groups/security/ - "This group is
> invite-only. You must be a member of this group in
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Matthew Jordan wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Steven Howes
> wrote:
>
>> On 13 Jun 2014, at 08:12, Matthew Jordan wrote:
>> > Apologies if this e-mail gets a bit rambling; by the time I send this
>> it will be past 2 AM here in the US and we've
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Steven Howes
wrote:
> On 13 Jun 2014, at 08:12, Matthew Jordan wrote:
> > Apologies if this e-mail gets a bit rambling; by the time I send this it
> will be past 2 AM here in the US and we've been scrambling to fix the
> regression caused by r415972 without reint
On 13 Jun 2014, at 08:12, Matthew Jordan wrote:
> Apologies if this e-mail gets a bit rambling; by the time I send this it will
> be past 2 AM here in the US and we've been scrambling to fix the regression
> caused by r415972 without reintroducing the vulnerability it fixed for the
> past 9 hou
I was looking at reviews.reviewboard.org to see if anything was in the
works to allow restricted reviews, I found
https://reviews.reviewboard.org/groups/security/ - "This group is
invite-only. You must be a member of this group in order to see any review
requests assigned to it. You can ask the adm
Apologies if this e-mail gets a bit rambling; by the time I send this it
will be past 2 AM here in the US and we've been scrambling to fix the
regression caused by r415972 without reintroducing the vulnerability it
fixed for the past 9 hours or so.
Clearly, there are things we should have done bet
