On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 08:48:48AM -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> On Friday 21 April 2006 06:09, Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
> > FWIW, I would say that "" is the best.
>
> Actually, that should be "Unknown <>", since the number field
> should be empty.
We are talking about individual fields here
On Friday 21 April 2006 06:09, Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
> FWIW, I would say that "" is the best.
Actually, that should be "Unknown <>", since the number field
should be empty.
--
Tilghman
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
as
FWIW, I would say that "" is the best.
Julian.
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
given the lack of feedback, I have started to fix the issues
described below.
As it is now, the code maps NULL or "" into three different values,
not in a completely consistent way:
""
"unknown"
""
what
given the lack of feedback, I have started to fix the issues
described below.
As it is now, the code maps NULL or "" into three different values,
not in a completely consistent way:
""
"unknown"
""
what is the correct format ?
luigi
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:50
