try. I'm
disappointed to see Digium acting as if it weren't.
On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 12:00 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 11:46:01 -0600
> From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] asterisk 1.4.1/1.2.16
ppointed to see Digium acting as if it weren't.
On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 12:00 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 11:46:01 -0600
> From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] asterisk 1.4.1/1.2.16 release quest
Anthony Lamantia wrote:
> "obvious reasons" .. ?, I really would like to know what the risk to my
> asterisk servers are.
We have never, and will never, help potential exploiters directly.
The issue is that a very simple SIP packet can cause Asterisk to crash.
Figuring out how to construct that
"obvious reasons" .. ?, I really would like to know what the risk to my
asterisk servers are.
On 3/4/07, Russell Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anthony Lamantia wrote:
> where can i find more information regarding it (protocol, is it a
> problem before authentication is required..etc)
Det
Anthony Lamantia wrote:
where can i find more information regarding it (protocol, is it a
problem before authentication is required..etc)
Details of how to exploit the problem are intentionally hard to find, for
obvious reasons.
--
Russell Bryant
Software Engineer
Digium, Inc.
begin:vcard
fn
