On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:02:16AM -0500, Matt Fredrickson wrote:
>> In the time in which I worked with DAHDI extensively, I don't think I
>> ever used that feature.
>
> So I guess there are no objections to remove it. This is now early in
>
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:02:16AM -0500, Matt Fredrickson wrote:
> In the time in which I worked with DAHDI extensively, I don't think I
> ever used that feature.
So I guess there are no objections to remove it. This is now early in
the development cycle, so it is a good time. If that feature had
In the time in which I worked with DAHDI extensively, I don't think I
ever used that feature.
Matthew Fredrickson
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In a new review request ([1]) I call for removing code that supports
> dialing a DAHDI channel by name. I suspect this
Hi,
In a new review request ([1]) I call for removing code that supports
dialing a DAHDI channel by name. I suspect this feature was never
actually used. I quote here from the commit message:
Support for referring to DAHDI channels by logical names was added in
(FIXME: when? Asterisk 11? 1.8?) an
