Sean wrote:
>
> with the changes to the ztdummy to rely on rtc vs jiffies, I
> am now forced to increase the interrupt frequency time by
> roughly 10x the frequency recommended for the SMP processing systems.
>
> Is this wise? Or would it be better to not assume that the
> CONFIG_HZ == 1000 and
Sean Cook wrote:
with the changes to the ztdummy to rely on rtc vs jiffies, I am now
forced to increase the interrupt frequency time by roughly 10x the
frequency recommended for the SMP processing systems.
Isn't that backwards? Using the RTC means we are _not_ relying on the
frequency of jiff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
with the changes to the ztdummy to rely on rtc vs jiffies, I am now
forced to increase the interrupt frequency time by roughly 10x the
frequency recommended for the SMP processing systems.
Is this wise? Or would it be better to not assume that the CO
