ms at hand.
> Regards,
> Rich
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 4:50 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Ast
So where is the patch set?
On 23 Jul 2004 at 15:29, Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) wrote:
> Hi folks,
>First, many thanks to the good people who developed this patch set.
> I now get Caller ID on my home line, so I do have a use for the
> Pissy that was keeping my door open (and one of its PCI slot
> Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Its also fairly common knowledge the x100p was not designed/built by
> > digium, but rather they choose to use an existing modem card that had
> > the chipsets (etc) that could be used for entry-level systems at a
> > very low cost, and those cards _were_
correct impedance setting is in the code for the UK for the new fxo
module. check the cvs log or the source.
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 16:50, Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) wrote:
> Hi again, Andrew, folks,
> Yup - the X100P (or clone) is a PSTN card for use with single lines.
> Fine device, and WAY cheap
As one of the core developers of the OpenH323 project, I agree with this
view.
Sometimes, forcibly integrating user contributed patches at any cost
creates more problems than it's solves. It's not always a matter of
increasing functionality at any cost - in the long term, an Open Source
project i
AIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] UK Caller ID patch and new CVS
>
> Yes I have.
>
> The main problem I have is that if a patch can make things
> working in the short terms then why not add it? If a more
> elegant solution is found weeks later that patch can simply
>
Hi again, Andrew, folks,
Yup - the X100P (or clone) is a PSTN card for use with single lines.
Fine device, and WAY cheaper than a TDM4xx with a single populated
FXO module (TDM01B), at least in the UK.
I assumed that you weren't seriously suggesting a TDM01B for a
single analogue line (if they wer
On Friday 23 July 2004 10:29, Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) wrote:
> > Frankly though, I don't think ANYONE should buy these cards, clone or
> > no -- Get
> > the TDMxx series.
> Why?
> Does progress tone/call supervision/CLI work in the UK for the TDM4xx?
> (at least now CLI works with the X100P :).
T
Hi folks,
First, many thanks to the good people who developed this patch set.
I now get Caller ID on my home line, so I do have a use for the
Pissy that was keeping my door open (and one of its PCI slots).
I have an X100P and S100U and that's it for zaptel devices so
this hack is fine by me. Prog
American and UK phone systems use a different system, don't they?
On 22 Jul 2004 at 1:46, Kevin Walsh wrote:
> Vassilis Konstantinou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > It appears that the new channels/chan_zap.c
> > has quite a few new lines of code and makes the original UK Caller ID
> > patch (second
Vassilis Konstantinou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It appears that the new channels/chan_zap.c
> has quite a few new lines of code and makes the original UK Caller ID
> patch (second patch for the chan_zap file) to fail.
>
> I tried to find my way through the code but it is getting a bit too
> compl
11 matches
Mail list logo
