that the resulting CEL events contain the provided
linked ID.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http
/extensions.conf
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4244/diff/
Testing
---
Ran test, it passes!
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev
of the originator.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo
:10 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4243/
---
(Updated Dec. 5, 2014, 9:10 p.m
,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
existing ARI origination tests and confirmed they still pass.
Performed calls manually and examined the resulting channels and CEL log to
ensure they contain the linked ID of the originator.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
existing ARI origination tests and confirmed they still pass.
Performed calls manually and examined the resulting channels and CEL log to
ensure they contain the linked ID of the originator.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
---
Ran test, it passes!
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo
this get placed in the wizard
order? Is it at the start, at the end, etc.
branches/12/res/res_pjsip_config_wizard.c
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4190/#comment24422
This doesn't clean up the object_type_wizards vector or the objects stored
in the wizard.
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 3, 2014, 11
?
- Joshua Colp
On Nov. 11, 2014, 10:41 p.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4170
/res_pjsip_outbound_publish.c
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4178/#comment24439
I'd opt for verbose messages for these.
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 4, 2014, 10:26 p.m., Kevin Harwell wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
On Dec. 8, 2014, 12:52 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
branches/12/res/res_pjsip_config_wizard.c, lines 261-283
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4190/diff/3/?file=69442#file69442line261
While forgiving this would yield an incomplete variable list, causing
the resulting object
,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
---
Ran test, it passes!
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman
the code will provide candidates for all
local addresses. If you are bound to only one then all the others will
fail. This should be taken into account - but it ultimately
(potentially) lessens the chance of a better route.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445
Mark Michelson wrote:
On 12/09/2014 01:42 PM, Joshua Colp wrote:
Mark Michelson wrote:
snip more snips
So, yes. In an ICE scenario the code will provide candidates for all
local addresses. If you are bound to only one then all the others will
fail. This should be taken into account
---
Manually tested and confirmed the behavior executes.
Ran directmedia transfer tests and confirmed they were written to take this
behavior into account. After fixing the behavior they were broken and are fixed
in another review.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
---
Ran tests against Asterisk using patch from 4248 and they are once again happy.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update
/asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/sdp_offer_answer/incoming/off-nominal/multiple-media-stream/audio-video/hold-declined/configs/ast1/extensions.conf
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4255/diff/
Testing
---
Ran test, it lives!
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
they continued to work as expected.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman
the existing
SDP offer/answer tests to make sure they continued to work as expected.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4250/#review13941
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 10, 2014, 10:21
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4252/#review13942
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 11, 2014, 4:43 p.m
!
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4230/#comment24479
As this requires a pjproject change this needs a configure check so it can
be optional instead of a hard dependency. As it is the build would just fail on
an older install.
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 4, 2014, 10:09 p.m., cloos wrote
/
Testing
---
Ran test. Before patch it failed, with patch it worked. I also ran the existing
SDP offer/answer tests to make sure they continued to work as expected.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation
/4255/diff/
Testing
---
Ran test, it lives!
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http
. After fixing the behavior they were broken and are fixed
in another review.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update
/pjsip/transfers/blind_transfer/callee_direct_media/sipp/alice.xml
6082
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4249/diff/
Testing
---
Ran tests against Asterisk using patch from 4248 and they are once again happy.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
of this it is generally hard to reproduce for me.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4257/#review13955
---
Ship it!
I also +1 ship it.
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 11, 2014
/
Testing
---
Ran some normal calls to ensure no regression. Also did some restarts/shutdowns
but due to the raceyness of this it is generally hard to reproduce for me.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth
in Asterisk - does it
not fit your needs?
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com www.asterisk.org
--
_
-- Bandwidth
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4190/#review13960
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 10, 2014, 11:21
?
There is no implemented functionality for AVPF. The RTP stack doesn't
generate or consume any.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com www.asterisk.org
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4269/#review13966
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 16, 2014, 5:49 p.m
in this case is the bridge in a state where we can't do an explicit
goto? Is this check wrong?
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 16, 2014, 8:41 p.m., opticron wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4277/#review13981
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 17, 2014, 3:36 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4268/#review13982
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 16, 2014, 4:24 p.m
/r/4271/#comment24509
It also *may* have been broken out by an ASYNCGOTO softhangup flag. It may
not have (ala continue).
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 17, 2014, 5:54 p.m., opticron wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail
://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4288/#comment24534
Why are you using this instead of a retrieve_by_fields and
AST_RETRIEVE_FLAG_MULTIPLE | AST_RETRIEVE_FLAG_ALL?
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 21, 2014, 10:52 p.m., George Joseph wrote
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4288/#review14024
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 22, 2014, midnight
handler to query for additional
information about the contact being dialed in order to do things.
Thoughts?
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com www.asterisk.org
or
not is to have separate endpoints.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com www.asterisk.org
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided
/4286/#comment24538
Yeah, put this in the 96-127 rang instead.
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 19, 2014, 8:24 p.m., Scott Griepentrog wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r
://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4285/#comment24540
I don't think this is the correct message to put here. They didn't request
priority 0, it just so happens that what they provided yielded us to having a
priority of 0. I could see something being confused if they saw this.
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 19, 2014
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4293/#review14030
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 23, 2014, 4:19 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4294/#review14031
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 23, 2014, 12:46
on the AoR map to what Contacts were provided by the channels.
If there isn't a one-to-one mapping, it at least becomes the domain of
the person building the system to resolve the discrepancy, and not
something that Asterisk itself has to figure out.
I'd be down with this.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4300/#review14046
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 29, 2014, 11:09
On Dec. 24, 2014, 9:46 p.m., Kevin Harwell wrote:
/branches/13/res/res_pjsip_refer.c, lines 604-605
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4296/diff/1/?file=70013#file70013line604
I don't think pjsip places a null terminator on the filled in string.
May need to get the result of the
up being other things
in the future
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 29, 2014, 1:22 a.m., George Joseph wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4297
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4298/#review14052
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 29, 2014, 1:29 a.m
/no_preserve_effective_context/test-config.yaml
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4298/#comment24568
now
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 29, 2014, 1:29 a.m., George Joseph wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4283/#review14050
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 24, 2014, 7:01 p.m
.
branches/13/res/res_pjsip_outbound_registration.c
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4301/#comment24571
I'm concerned that the behavior that used to happen was explicitly
documented, it wasn't overlooked. We're now changing it - why was it the
previous way in the first place?
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 23, 2014, 1:41 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
/trunk/main/rtp_engine.c, line 2193
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4286/diff/1/?file=69966#file69966line2193
Yeah, put this in the 96-127 rang instead.
Scott Griepentrog wrote:
Wouldn't that cause ast_rtp_engine_load_format
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4286/#review14061
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Dec. 31, 2014, 6:06 p.m
they then failed.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk
,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4310/#review14066
---
On Jan. 2, 2015, 6:05 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4356/#review14274
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Jan. 20, 2015, 3:10 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4345/#review14273
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Jan. 15, 2015, 8:07 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4363/#review14275
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Jan. 21, 2015, 4:30 p.m
a few times, it unloaded.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman
(and by extension people subscribed to it using
something like SIP)? This also opens up a window where someone may try to use
the configured extension and it won't be available.
- Joshua Colp
On Jan. 30, 2015, 6:16 p.m., George Joseph wrote
/4370/#comment24928
If the compiler being used is clang I think this should be required here
and not just a warning when you actually try to compile. If the support doesn't
exist it's just not going to work and having configure succeed is just putting
off the inevitable failure.
- Joshua
.
- Joshua Colp
On Feb. 3, 2015, 4:30 p.m., Ben Merrills wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4400/
---
(Updated
Ditto.
- Joshua Colp
On Feb. 6, 2015, 1:13 a.m., David Lee wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4365
://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4338/diff/
Testing
---
Ran show registrations and reloads over and over, still happy. Without patch
this would sometimes crash.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api
transport on the message is already correct it is not
altered.
Diffs
-
/branches/13/res/res_pjsip_multihomed.c 430545
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4331/diff/
Testing
---
Ran test and confirmed it failed without patch, passed with patch.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/~jcolp/Transport+Selection
Diffs
-
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4328/diff/
Testing
---
I opened the wiki page. It opened.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation
and makes sense.
Diffs (updated)
-
/branches/13/res/res_pjsip_multihomed.c 430683
/branches/13/res/res_pjsip.c 430683
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4331/diff/
Testing
---
Ran test and confirmed it failed without patch, passed with patch.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
/incoming_call_on_second_transport/configs/ast1/extensions.conf
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4335/diff/
Testing
---
Ran it. It passed. Sabotaged it. It failed. Rolled back fix. It failed.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
/res/res_pjsip_multihomed.c 430683
/branches/13/res/res_pjsip.c 430683
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4331/diff/
Testing
---
Ran test and confirmed it failed without patch, passed with patch.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
this:
Why can we not construct a proper URI from the beginning, why is a module
required to alter it afterwards?
- Joshua Colp
On Jan. 15, 2015, 8:07 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply
/res_pjsip_transport_websocket.c
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4316/#comment24685
Etc.
- Joshua Colp
On Jan. 19, 2015, 3:16 a.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4316
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4350/#review14225
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Jan. 17, 2015, 5:32 p.m
.
Joshua Colp wrote:
That's not the transport being spoken of. It literally means a SIP URI
such as sip:1000@127.0.0.1;transport=tcp
Joshua Colp wrote:
I've tweaked things some, added some endpoints, and referenced the
applicable section that will be used depending
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4328/#review14194
---
On Jan. 12, 2015, 1:33 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote
.
As a side note, SRV may change your port address.
Joshua Colp wrote:
I've tweaked the page slightly to include this condition but have not
gone further. Specifically because this page is for how a local transport is
selected based on the existing code and not the process of target
,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
, and the lifetime of the
helper entry.
As it is it's very... confusing...
- Joshua Colp
On Feb. 16, 2015, 6:30 p.m., Kevin Harwell wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
/4428/#comment25012
Why the !mod addition? Something trigger it?
- Joshua Colp
On Feb. 16, 2015, 6:58 p.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r
On Feb. 16, 2015, 6:50 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/branches/12/main/aoc.c, lines 1871-1880
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4427/diff/1/?file=71450#file71450line1871
I don't think this is the right way to fix the problem.
This is really just working around the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4428/#review14493
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Feb. 16, 2015, 6:58 p.m
-
/branches/13/res/parking/parking_manager.c 431112
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4375/diff/
Testing
---
Unloaded module a few times, it unloaded.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4371/#review14307
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Jan. 26, 2015, 11:38
: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/diff/
Testing
---
Tried various scenarios including attended transfers and multiple Asterisk
instances in the path. Previously media would go via the wrong route or not at
all. With patch reinvites occur as expected.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
On Jan. 29, 2015, 4:14 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
branches/13/res/res_pjsip_outbound_publish.c, line 927
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4384/diff/2/?file=71172#file71172line927
So...
This may actually cause publish state to be reflected incorrectly on
the remote
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4387/#review14353
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On Jan. 29, 2015, 1:10 a.m
://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4384/#comment24866
What does a user see when this happens? Any indication?
- Joshua Colp
On Jan. 28, 2015, 11:44 p.m., Kevin Harwell wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
then it will be out of order.
As well - wouldn't this cause to the queue to potentially grow
uncontrollably?
- Joshua Colp
On Jan. 29, 2015, 3:55 p.m., Kevin Harwell wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply
, we could split the concept of the endpoint name from the auth
user, which would then allow the endpoints to be named 107 (for example) and
the auth user to be her MAC address.
Joshua Colp wrote:
I think in practice this would just cause problems. Not all devices allow
those two things
/
Testing
---
Ran tests. They ran.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com
.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
would go via the wrong route or not at
all. With patch reinvites occur as expected.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE
. Previously media would go via the wrong route or not at
all. With patch reinvites occur as expected.
Thanks,
Joshua Colp
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
with the technology join/leave callbacks.
Otherwise, what is the point of the join/leave technology callbacks if the
technology is going to look at the bridge channel member list at
inappropriate times?
Joshua Colp wrote:
That flag can be unset and reset appropriately. The bridge
://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378/#review14308
---
On Jan. 27, 2015, 12:06 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4378
701 - 800 of 1200 matches
Mail list logo