Re: [asterisk-users] FW: The trixbox Revolution Continues! Sign up forthe Webinar.

2007-08-11 Thread Steve Totaro
Let's fork Digium's GUI. Zeeshan Zakaria wrote: Why don't they say FreePBX. After all trixbox is all about FreePBX. If they remove FreePBX from Trixbox, nothing is left in it. A half working HUD, and another small little things don't make any major difference after all. So are the

[asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition

2007-08-11 Thread Nitesh Divecha
Hello All, While looking for solution to solve my Callback DTMF problem, I came across LumenVox Speech Recognition software. Has anyone tried out? Need some feedback before I purchase it... Please help... Cheers, Nitesh ___ --Bandwidth and

Re: [asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition

2007-08-11 Thread Steve Totaro
Dean Collins is probably the list expert on this. Thanks, Steve Totaro Nitesh Divecha wrote: Hello All, While looking for solution to solve my Callback DTMF problem, I came across LumenVox Speech Recognition software. Has anyone tried out? Need some feedback before I purchase it... Please

Re: [asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition

2007-08-11 Thread Dean Collins
Hi Steve, no I'm no expert at all I do however (or did) have an interest in building a far more comprehensive solution for an ASP solution combining other solutions that would have helped the asterisk community however could never get it off the ground. Nitesh to answer your original

Re: [asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition

2007-08-11 Thread Steve Totaro
Dean, Don't be so modest, you have done your homework... ;-) Question: Can you elaborate on this a little more, however there are limitations but for 90% of applications will work great. Thanks, Steve Dean Collins wrote: Hi Steve, no I'm no expert at all I do however (or did) have an

Re: [asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition

2007-08-11 Thread Nitesh Divecha
Thanks Dean and Steve, I am planning to use for my IVR notification application which is built using PHPAGI and A2Billing (Callback, Calling Card). I saw the $50.00 Starter kit does it provide some functionality? Cheers, Nitesh Dean Collins wrote: Hi Steve, no I'm no expert at all I do

[asterisk-users] indications.c: Can't generate that much data!

2007-08-11 Thread Dermot Bradley
Linux 2.6.20, asterisk 1.2.23, mISDN 1_1_5, Digium B410P BRI card. When calls come in via ISDN the destination phone does ring but the caller hears no ringing tone, once the SIP phone is answered everything works as expected. Calls from SIP phone to SIP phone internally do let the caller hear a

Re: [asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition

2007-08-11 Thread Dean Collins
Hi Nitesh - yep great place to start. Regards, Dean Collins Cognation Pty Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-212-203-4357 Ph +61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nitesh Divecha Sent: Saturday, 11

Re: [asterisk-users] indications.c: Can't generate that much data!

2007-08-11 Thread Steve Totaro
Dermot Bradley wrote: Linux 2.6.20, asterisk 1.2.23, mISDN 1_1_5, Digium B410P BRI card. When calls come in via ISDN the destination phone does ring but the caller hears no ringing tone, once the SIP phone is answered everything works as expected. Calls from SIP phone to SIP phone internally

[asterisk-users] BLF for Queue

2007-08-11 Thread Todd H
Hi - I guess it's not possible to use Asterisk BLF function for queues... Can someone confirm that? I'm looking for that type of function with calling queues. I have Grandstream gp2000 phones. thanks Todd ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation

Re: [asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition

2007-08-11 Thread Nitesh Divecha
Thanks Dean... will update you on the progress... Cheers, Nitesh Dean Collins wrote: Hi Nitesh - yep great place to start. Regards, Dean Collins Cognation Pty Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-212-203-4357 Ph +61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: [asterisk-users] Ordering BRI From ATT

2007-08-11 Thread Trevor G. Hammonds
Bill, I am not aware of any commercial Asterisk-compatible cards that support North American BRIs right out of the box. The best I have been able to come up with was a card sold on eBay, where the seller promises to supply a patch that needs to be applied to Asterisk (based on BRIstuff) so that

Re: [asterisk-users] indications.c: Can't generate that much data!

2007-08-11 Thread Dermot Bradley
Steve Totaro wrote: Do you have the r option in the line that dials the extension coming from the PSTN? The dial command is visible in the 1st log line I sent and includes a r option: Aug 10 17:43:44 VERBOSE[1810] logger.c: -- Executing Dial(mISDN/1-1, SIP/1000|15|tr) in new stack

Re: [asterisk-users] indications.c: Can't generate that much data!

2007-08-11 Thread Steve Totaro
Dermot Bradley wrote: Steve Totaro wrote: Do you have the r option in the line that dials the extension coming from the PSTN? The dial command is visible in the 1st log line I sent and includes a r option: Aug 10 17:43:44 VERBOSE[1810] logger.c: -- Executing Dial(mISDN/1-1,

Re: [asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition http://www.cognation.net/asterisk/Tellme/index.htm

2007-08-11 Thread Dean Collins
Basically I tried to pitch the concept of an ASP based speech recognition SIP service to Tellme back in 2005 as a JV in that they provided the software and ports and I (eg investors) provided the servers and bandwidth. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/tellme In 2006 they came out with a JV

Re: [asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition http://www.cognation.net/asterisk/Tellme/index.htm

2007-08-11 Thread Steve Totaro
Yes, I have followed your history with this idea/project with great interest. I am well aware of what went down. What I want to know is what specifically you meant by, however there are limitations but for 90% of applications will work great. What limitations? What 10% of applications will

Re: [asterisk-users] indications.c: Can't generate that much data!

2007-08-11 Thread Dermot Bradley
Steve Totaro wrote: OK... Have you tried removing the r switch? Ok, removing it now gives a ring tone. The logs show: Aug 11 18:30:30 VERBOSE[13406] logger.c: -- Executing Dial(mISDN/1-1,SIP/1000|15|t) in new stack Aug 11 18:30:30 DEBUG[13406] chan_sip.c: Setting NAT on RTP to 524288 Aug

Re: [asterisk-users] indications.c: Can't generate that much data!

2007-08-11 Thread Steve Totaro
Dermot Bradley wrote: Steve Totaro wrote: OK... Have you tried removing the r switch? Ok, removing it now gives a ring tone. The logs show: Aug 11 18:30:30 VERBOSE[13406] logger.c: -- Executing Dial(mISDN/1-1,SIP/1000|15|t) in new stack Aug 11 18:30:30 DEBUG[13406]

Re: [asterisk-users] Dialplan loop

2007-08-11 Thread David Bandel
On 8/10/07, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:12:12PM -0500, David Bandel wrote: [snip] ... exten = s,n,Set(loop = $[${loop} + 1]) exten = s,n,Set(loop=$[${loop} + 1]) Thanx Tzafrir. It works now. I guess the documentation I read that said that white

Re: [asterisk-users] Sort of OT: PBX vs CO

2007-08-11 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 01:08:18PM -0600, Anthony Francis wrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:37:37AM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote: And as a CO switch, you *must* switch TDM; VoIP isn't really an option. Really? http://www.pt.com/products/prod_segway_ntwksolution.html You've vastly misread

Re: [asterisk-users] Sort of OT: PBX vs CO

2007-08-11 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 05:20:38PM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote: It might be possible to glue something together with it and OpenSER and a media gateway control protocol like H.248 and a few of these SS7-IP appliances, but it would have all the ragtag qualities of Napoleon's army routed in

Re: [asterisk-users] Sort of OT: PBX vs CO

2007-08-11 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 01:25:32AM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote: If it ever happens, it will certainly take Asterisk's usefulness to a whole, whole new level, at least as a good cheap media gateway. I dunno; my instinct is usually not to use PCI media cards at all; I'd much prefer all

Re: [asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition

2007-08-11 Thread mitcheloc
Dean, Are you aware of any better options for speech recognition? (though I'm sure more expensive) On 8/11/07, Nitesh Divecha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Dean... will update you on the progress... Cheers, Nitesh Dean Collins wrote: Hi Nitesh - yep great place to start.

Re: [asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition

2007-08-11 Thread Dean Collins
Nuance etc. and Steve to answer your questions - lumenvox just doesn't have the engine or phonetic capabilities that some of the the larger systems have. Like I said before - I've been stunned considering how cheap it is how good it is but. if you are looking for a less defined utterance

[asterisk-users] asterisk and telewell isdn hfc problem

2007-08-11 Thread Giedrius Augys
Hi, I have debian etch 4.0 machine (2.6.18) with two TW-ISDN PCI (Hfc) cards. I use bristuff-0.3.0-PRE-1y-e (asterisk-1.2.17,libpri-1.2.4,zaptel-1.2.16). I also have patched zaphfc with zaphfc_0.4.0-test1_florz-13.diff.gz (I load module: insmod /usr/src/bristuff-0.3.0-PRE-1y-e/zaphfc/zaphfc.ko

Re: [asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition

2007-08-11 Thread mitcheloc
Dean, Hmm.. I was hoping something that could be used with Asterisk on the machine locally... Nuance doesn't seem to offer that. On 8/11/07, Dean Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nuance etc. and Steve to answer your questions - lumenvox just doesn't have the engine or phonetic capabilities

Re: [asterisk-users] test the email-list OT

2007-08-11 Thread C F
No you cant. This message is being dropped as well. On 8/10/07, Trevor Peirce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: C F wrote: This is the postmaster at the list and I am notifying you that your message failed. Over the past two days my new posts seem to have silently been dropped. I wonder if I can

Re: [asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition

2007-08-11 Thread Dean Collins
No they have a standalone solution - lol NLVR is a whole separate server (or server farm) in most onsite installations. Regards, Dean Collins Cognation Pty Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-212-203-4357 Ph +61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [asterisk-users] indications.c: Can't generate that much data!

2007-08-11 Thread Luki
I don't see what difference removing the r option has made from an Asterisk perspective - in both cases Asterisk tries to emulate a ringtone but fails for some reason when r is present. According to the the show application dial help having no r present for Dial should NOT generate a ringing

Re: [asterisk-users] test the email-list OT

2007-08-11 Thread Trevor Peirce
C F wrote: No you cant. This message is being dropped as well. Shame. Seriously though I posted a new thread right after I posted that reply. The reply showed up but the new thread still seems to be MIA. No bounce or anything (and I have no filtering on this account). Weird... Maybe I'll

Re: [asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition

2007-08-11 Thread Nitesh Divecha
Dean, Can the LumenVox Speech Recognition engine understand numbers? Sorry to ask stupid questions but kinda curious... as for my application all I want is to the software to understand the numbers and provide me the output. Cheers, Nitesh Dean Collins wrote: No they have a standalone

Re: [asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition

2007-08-11 Thread mitcheloc
Nitesh, They claim to support numbers on their website so I would say yes. On 8/11/07, Nitesh Divecha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dean, Can the LumenVox Speech Recognition engine understand numbers? Sorry to ask stupid questions but kinda curious... as for my application all I want is to the

Re: [asterisk-users] Ordering BRI From ATT

2007-08-11 Thread Stephen Bosch
Trevor G. Hammonds wrote: Bill, I am not aware of any commercial Asterisk-compatible cards that support North American BRIs right out of the box. The best I have been able to come up with was a card sold on eBay, where the seller promises to supply a patch that needs to be applied to

Re: [asterisk-users] test the email-list OT

2007-08-11 Thread C F
OMG, someone thought that it's for real. Wow. On 8/11/07, Trevor Peirce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: C F wrote: No you cant. This message is being dropped as well. Shame. Seriously though I posted a new thread right after I posted that reply. The reply showed up but the new thread still seems

Re: [asterisk-users] test the email-list OT

2007-08-11 Thread Stephen Bosch
C F wrote: OMG, someone thought that it's for real. Wow. I don't think so. Read the sentence carefully: On 8/11/07, Trevor Peirce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: C F wrote: No you cant. This message is being dropped as well. Shame. Seriously though I posted a new thread right after I posted that