Re: [asterisk-users] Dailing any number PSTN or MObile number

2009-08-23 Thread ABBAS SHAKEEL
Sorry that was sent by mistake i pressed ctrl+s unintentionally The question is . I have configured Asterisk with TDM400P i can recieve calls every thing goes fine... But one is unclear to me. If i want to intiate a call to a PSTN number or any mobile number as we normally do with

Re: [asterisk-users] Dailing any number PSTN or MObile number

2009-08-23 Thread Matt Riddell
On 24/08/09 6:31 PM, ABBAS SHAKEEL wrote: > > Sorry that was sent by mistake > > > > The question is . I have configured Asterisk with TDM400P i can > recieve calls every thing goes fine... > > But one is unclear to me. > > If i want to intiate a call to a PSTN number or any mobile num

Re: [asterisk-users] Dailing any number PSTN or MObile number

2009-08-23 Thread ABBAS SHAKEEL
Sorry that was sent by mistake The question is . I have configured Asterisk with TDM400P i can recieve calls every thing goes fine... But one is unclear to me. If i want to intiate a call to a PSTN number or any mobile number as we normally do with our phones How can i do tha

Re: [asterisk-users] Dailing any number PSTN or MObile number

2009-08-23 Thread Matt Riddell
On 24/08/09 6:27 PM, ABBAS SHAKEEL wrote: > Hello > > I have a :) hmmm might need a little more info -- Cheers, Matt Riddell Director ___ http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News) http://www.venturevoip.com/st.php (SmoothTorque Predi

[asterisk-users] Dailing any number PSTN or MObile number

2009-08-23 Thread ABBAS SHAKEEL
Hello I have a -- Best Regards Shakeel Abbas ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE o

Re: [asterisk-users] * 1.4 -> 1.6, zaptel -> dahdi

2009-08-23 Thread Matt Riddell
On 24/08/09 4:15 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 13:47 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > >> extensions.conf is fully supported in Asterisk 1.6.x; there have been >> some syntax changes (which are covered in the UPGRADE files) > > I was able to overcome a few more hurdles and make this

Re: [asterisk-users] disconnection silent channels

2009-08-23 Thread ABBAS SHAKEEL
Hello If silent means the channels that are hangup then you can do this " You may need to enable busydetect in chan_dahdi.conf or zapata.conf. However, if you do enable it, I would recommend you also tune it with the busycount and busypattern options so you don't get false positives (asterisk hang

[asterisk-users] disconnection silent channels

2009-08-23 Thread Pezhman Lali
Dear,is any way to find silent channels , and disconnect them after 30 secs? best ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-

Re: [asterisk-users] * 1.4 -> 1.6, zaptel -> dahdi

2009-08-23 Thread Greg Woods
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 13:47 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > extensions.conf is fully supported in Asterisk 1.6.x; there have been > some syntax changes (which are covered in the UPGRADE files) I was able to overcome a few more hurdles and make this work. Little annoyances such as (after some G

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4.26.1, 1.6.0.13, 1.6.1.4

2009-08-23 Thread David Backeberg
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 7:34 PM, David A. Bandel wrote: > Folks, > > I've scoured the website and googled, but can't find a definitive answer: > What's the difference? > > OK, the site says 1.4.26.1 is latest stable. > Site also says 1.6.2.0-beta4 is latest beta. > > So what are the others? Have y

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4.26.1, 1.6.0.13, 1.6.1.4

2009-08-23 Thread Matt Riddell
On 24/08/09 11:34 AM, David A. Bandel wrote: > Folks, > > I've scoured the website and googled, but can't find a definitive answer: > What's the difference? http://www.asterisk.org/node/48602 Excerpt: Recently I have been seeing more and more questions about how Asterisk is being released now,

[asterisk-users] 1.4.26.1, 1.6.0.13, 1.6.1.4

2009-08-23 Thread David A. Bandel
Folks, I've scoured the website and googled, but can't find a definitive answer: What's the difference? OK, the site says 1.4.26.1 is latest stable. Site also says 1.6.2.0-beta4 is latest beta. So what are the others? TIA, David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition.