See if you find this tutorial on IAX peering useful:
http://astrecipes.net/index.php?n=204
Thanks
l.
2009/12/15 Landy Landy
> Hello List.
>
> I have a question regarding connecting two asterisk servers. I'm trying to
> learn how asterisk comunicates from server to server. I already have a
> ser
> Cyprus VoIP wrote:
>
>> This is the reINVITE SDP received from the SIP Proxy:
>> ---
>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>> Content-Length: 353
>>
>> v=0
>> o=root 30427 30428 IN IP4 194.98.xxx.xxx
>> s=session
>> c=IN IP4 194.98.xxx.xxx
>> t=0 0
>> m=image 17548 udptl t38
>> a=T38FaxVersio
Hi everyone,
I'm having a trouble while developing monitoring tool for queues. I'm
using C# Sharp & I follow the instruction on
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+manager+Example%3A+C+Sharp.
My question is how can I get information about how many people are there
waiting on queue with
Alex Samad wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 08:59:34PM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
>
>> Gavin Spurgeon writes:
>>
>>
>>> iSip (£2.39)
>>> http://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/isip-push-service-formerly-sipphone/id298202722?mt=8
>>>
>> I have been very impressed by the audio quality from i
> Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2009, 1:26 AM
> trust both the side giving IP address
> in the sip.conf
I did this in the iax.conf file
[client]
type=friend
username=asterisk2
authuser=asterisk2
fromuser=asterisk2
secret=sss
auth=md5
context=from_client
host=172.16.0.11
trunk=yes
qualify=yes
Did you check the jitter settings on asterisk & the phones as well?
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinf
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 08:59:34PM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> Gavin Spurgeon writes:
>
> > iSip (£2.39)
> > http://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/isip-push-service-formerly-sipphone/id298202722?mt=8
>
> I have been very impressed by the audio quality from iSip, at least from
> the "other end" so to
> I'll check it out, but Grandstream HT503 doesn't have a good introduction on
> voip-wiki web-page:
> http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/HT-503
>
> --
> Joseph
>
> On 12/11/09 19:37, jonas kellens wrote:
>>Grandstream HT503
Noy a really big problem to configure, but in my case the FXO port alway
Shouldn't you have 'nat=yes' in your peer context [sipconnect.sipgate.de]
and not in [general]?
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists
I'm trying to get two server communicate with each other and call from one to
the other but, I'm having a lot of problems.
I tried to create a iax trunk between the two:
At the server:
[client]
type=friend
username=asterisk2
authuser=asterisk2
fromuser=asterisk2
secret=sss
auth=md5
context=fr
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 11:49 -0600, Bob Smither wrote:
> This has to be easy, but I have spent a fair amount of time looking for
> a solution to no avail. I am trying to get multiple phones to ring when
> a call comes into an Asterisk box from a particular phone number. What
> happens is that onl
Hi,
I think you need to remove the line echocanceller in system.conf
You could also try to use fxotune, it'a really improving things.
You also need to put echocancel=yes in chan_dahdi.conf
Matthieu NICAISE
Responsable technique
GSM : 06 72 19 09 55
techni...@thinkrosystem.com
---
O.K., I restored the Allow=ulaw in the sip_general_additional.conf file,
then I found the individual extension settings in the
sip_additional.conf file and I added
disallow=all
allow=g729
to each of the extensions at the remote site. Then I did a SIP RELOAD.
So we'll see how that goes.
Thanks
If I installed a Digium echo cancellation module on my TE121 card, do I need to
remove the echocanceller line under the system.conf? How should I have it?
This is my system.conf:
bchan=1-23
dchan=24
echocanceller=mg2,1-23
Thank you!
Hin
From: hin lee
To: no
At 12:45 PM 12/15/2009, you wrote:
>The PRI doesn't seem to cause any problem for the majority of the users
>(at the home site) it's just the 8 users at the remote site who are
>complaining of quality issues.
So out of curiosity, if you were to limit the phone usage for an hour
at the remote sit
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:37:59PM +, listu...@spamomania.co.uk wrote:
> Some recent issues I had with hardware seem to come back to not
> understanding two very similarly named files:
>
> /etc/asterisk/dahdi-channels.conf
> /etc/asterisk/chan_dahdi.conf
>
> I've modified the chan_dahdi.conf
I don't know how FreePBX works, but with vanilla Asterisk you would do
something like this with your sip.conf:
[general]
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
allow=g729
[localA]
callerid=Local phone A <100>
username=localA
secret=blahblah1
[localB]
callerid=Local phone B <101>
username=localB
secret=blah1bl
O.K., so for now (as a test) I just commented out the "allow=ULAW" line
in the SIP.conf (actually it's sip_general_additional.conf on this
FreePBX box) and that does seem to be forcing all traffic to G.729.
I think ultimately I'd like to let the local users use ULAW because it
seems to sound bette
O.K., I think I'm catching on. I only have a single SIP.CONF file that
ALL of the extensions are using so I'm gathering that I need to set up a
separate SIP.CONF file (or perhaps just an included file) for the 8
users at the remote office which ONLY Allows the G.729.
So now I'm figuring out how t
That's a bit misleading. Yes calls that travel over a PRI will be using
ulaw, but only over the PRI leg of the call. The SIP leg can still be
using G.729 with asterisk transcoding between the two legs.
Ben, You haven't shown us the contents of your sip.conf file for the
peers you are working on
- "Ben Schorr" wrote:
> I thought I already did that - which is how they now get some (but
> not
> yet all) of their calls on G.729.
>
Allowing G.729 in your configurations (disallow=all, allow=g729) enables those
endpoints to use that codec *THROUGH* the Asterisk system to other endpoin
Yes, the routers are another issue we're dealing with. We've configured
them to prioritize traffic to/from our Asterisk server but I'm not
convinced that setting is really working as expected. So we're working
with the vendor on that.
The effective bandwidth is 6Mb/sec down x 1.4Mb/sec up (so ba
And tell Asterisk that G.729 is the only codec for that number as well!
Cary Fitch
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.
Watch the calls on the console. Try both ways. Document what you see and
your codec settings on both the phone, and sip.conf.
You may have to tell the phone that the only codec it can use is G.729,
don't just make that "first choice". Make it the only choice.
Cary Fitch
-Original Message---
Do your routers allow giving these users maximum priority? What is the
effective bandwidth on the VPN connection?
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:47
I thought I already did that - which is how they now get some (but not
yet all) of their calls on G.729.
Ben M. Schorr
Chief Executive Officer
__
Roland Schorr & Tower
www.rolandschorr.com
b...@rolandschorr.com
> -Original Message-
> From: as
Well, I know I still have a LOT to learn about Asterisk but...how will
they get their incoming phone calls from their DIDs (which the TelCo
sends to their PRI) if I move the remote office onto a SIP provider?
The PRI doesn't seem to cause any problem for the majority of the users
(at the home site
- "Ben Schorr" wrote:
> Oh, dear. So my users with "less-than-ideal" bandwidth are stuck
> with
> drop-outs and poor sound quality because they can't use the reduced
> bandwidth codec for those calls? :-(
>
> They've been complaining that they often end up on a call where one
> or
> both pa
Why not restrict these 8 users to a SIP provider like (but not)
bandwidth.com? By eliminating the PRI element, you should completely
resolve the problem.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ben Scho
Oh, dear. So my users with "less-than-ideal" bandwidth are stuck with
drop-outs and poor sound quality because they can't use the reduced
bandwidth codec for those calls? :-(
They've been complaining that they often end up on a call where one or
both parties are "cutting in and out". Unfortunat
IMO you can only use the G.729 on a SIP call. If the call falls onto the
PRI framework, ulaw will be forced.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:11 PM
T
Sorry, I think I may have misspoke...
What I'm hoping for is that all of the connections between my phones (or
at least a particular group of them) and my Asterisk server will use
G.729. Currently it seems like it usually is, but not always, and I
haven't figured out the pattern.
All of our call
Gavin Spurgeon writes:
> iSip (£2.39)
> http://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/isip-push-service-formerly-sipphone/id298202722?mt=8
I have been very impressed by the audio quality from iSip, at least from
the "other end" so to speak. It shares the basic flaw of not being able
to run in the background wi
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Ben Schorr wrote:
> O.K., interestingly enough when I call our extensions from my mobile
> phone it still seems to be using ULAW, but when they dial out it seems
> to be using G.729 now.
>
> Is there something in Dahdi that I need to configure so that inbound
> calls (from th
hbk writes:
> Where to look for forgotten DTMF detection settings?
Try relaxdtmf=no. sip show settings to check that it worked.
/Benny
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSC
O.K., interestingly enough when I call our extensions from my mobile
phone it still seems to be using ULAW, but when they dial out it seems
to be using G.729 now.
Is there something in Dahdi that I need to configure so that inbound
calls (from the PRI on a Digium TE205) use G.729 to get to the pho
O.K., thanks, I'm catching on (slowly). Waiting for the next call to
see if the SIP.CONF change did the trick.
Ben M. Schorr
Chief Executive Officer
__
Roland Schorr & Tower
www.rolandschorr.com
b...@rolandschorr.com
> -Original Message-
> Fro
You should only need a reboot for DAHDI changes (not always then...)
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:08 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Comm
Ahhh...yes, I think that may have been it. I moved G.729 to the top of
that list (just below disallow) and now I have a "restart when
convenient" pending. Is that sufficient or do I have to actually reboot
the server for the change to take effect?
Best wishes and aloha,
Ben M. Schorr
Chief Exe
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Ben Schorr wrote:
> Ahhh...yes, I think that may have been it. I moved G.729 to the top of
> that list (just below disallow) and now I have a "restart when
> convenient" pending. Is that sufficient or do I have to actually reboot
> the server for the change to take effect?
Hi!
Since we upgraded to 1.6.1.11, asterisk is only outputing monitored files
-in and -out.
It is not mixing them in the end.
queues.conf has monitor-type=MixMonitor...
Would somebody help me debug why it doesn't mix the sounds??
Thanks
___
-- Bandwid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Schorr wrote:
> I’ve got G.729 loaded in the modules on the Asterisk server and on the
> Polycom phones I’ve set G.729 to be the first preference of codec, but
> still when I go SIP SHOW CHANNELS during active calls it still shows
> “(ULAW)” (G.71
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Ben Schorr wrote:
> Asterisk 1.4 - FreePBX - Polycom 330 and 501 phones.
>
>
>
> I've got G.729 loaded in the modules on the Asterisk server and on the
> Polycom phones I've set G.729 to be the first preference of codec, but
> still when I go SIP SHOW CHANNELS during active c
Asterisk 1.4 - FreePBX - Polycom 330 and 501 phones.
I've got G.729 loaded in the modules on the Asterisk server and on the
Polycom phones I've set G.729 to be the first preference of codec, but
still when I go SIP SHOW CHANNELS during active calls it still shows
"(ULAW)" (G.711) as the codec i
How about:
exten => 977,1,ExecIf($[${CALLERID(num)} =
733025975]?Set(CALLERID(num)=0317998975))
exten => 977,n,ExecIf($[${CALLERID(num)} = 1234]?Set(CALLERID(num)=317998977))
exten => 977,n,ExecIf($[${CALLERID(num)} = 5678]?Set(CALLERID(num)=317998978))
[..]
exten => 977,n,Dial(SIP/0317998977)
O
Because we already have a reduntant way to tell if the member is in a call,
we turned on ringinuse. It seems to work.
The member is still show as (In use).
Would anybody help?
Thanks.
2009/12/15 Tiago Geada
> Hello list.
>
> We just upgraded to 1.6.1.11.
>
> We are using real time informatio
Because we already have a reduntant way to tell if the member is in a call,
we turned on ringinuse. It seems to work.
The member is still show as (In use).
Would anybody help?
Thanks.
2009/12/15 Tiago Geada
> Hello list.
>
> We just upgraded to 1.6.1.11.
>
> We are using real time informatio
girgis Rasmy wrote:
> Does anyone know a sip client that can be installed on Nokia /Symbian
> that register to asterisk directly , i installed Fring ,seems that the
> register goes to an intermediate server on Internet that forward it to
> my asterisk server .
What Nokia phone do you have? I h
Cyprus VoIP wrote:
> This is the reINVITE SDP received from the SIP Proxy:
> ---
> Content-Type: application/sdp
> Content-Length: 353
>
> v=0
> o=root 30427 30428 IN IP4 194.98.xxx.xxx
> s=session
> c=IN IP4 194.98.xxx.xxx
> t=0 0
> m=image 17548 udptl t38
> a=T38FaxVersion:0
> a=T38MaxB
On 15 Dec 2009, at 15:39, Olivier wrote:
> Steve
>
> With SPC tool, yow would still need to input correct parameter name
> to get appropriate config file.
Hi,
Generate the sample with it. It has built in help. There are numerous
instruction guides online. You can use a tool such as Google to
2009/12/15 Steve Howes
>
> On 15 Dec 2009, at 13:08, Olivier wrote:
> > I could successfully set this value using :
> > myid
> >
> > But, I'm still fighting to set parameters from PSTN Line tab. I
> > tried many combinations with tags like :
> > or
>
> Have you looked at the SPC tool to generat
Hello list.
We just upgraded to 1.6.1.11.
We are using real time information stored on mysql databases. That is all
running fine.
Now, since we upgraded, some member don't get calls from queues.
In CLI: "queue show" shows something like:
611 (Local/6...@agents) with penalty 20 (realtime) (*In us
2009/12/15 Olivier
>
>
> 2009/12/15 Steve Howes
>
>
>> On 15 Dec 2009, at 10:42, Olivier wrote:
>> > Unfortunately, it seems macro expansion doesn't occur in Line1 tab :
>> > when I type $A or $(A) or ${A} or $GPP_A or $UID1 in User ID field
>> > (in Line1 tab), asterisk receives a REGISTER mess
Forkcdr may be the thing you need. As I understand it, it does a "snapshot"
cdr record and continues with the call.
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Giedrius Augys
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 6:08 AM
To:
On 15 Dec 2009, at 13:08, Olivier wrote:
> I could successfully set this value using :
> myid
>
> But, I'm still fighting to set parameters from PSTN Line tab. I
> tried many combinations with tags like :
> or
Have you looked at the SPC tool to generate this? The Cisco website
will let you
In that case, you're going to have to talk to your provider.
They SHOULD be able to easily send the DID with the call...
-Dave
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of John Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 5:17 AM
To: Ast
Hello,
We upgraded the Asterisk to 1.6.1.11. Now, there's no RTP reINVITE, but
the datagram handling of Asterisk is strange. Basically, it "takes a
commission" from both ends, and ends up overflowing:
Reminder, we're dealing in this example with a passthrough, where we
have an ATA device conne
2009/12/15 Steve Howes
>
> On 15 Dec 2009, at 10:42, Olivier wrote:
> > Unfortunately, it seems macro expansion doesn't occur in Line1 tab :
> > when I type $A or $(A) or ${A} or $GPP_A or $UID1 in User ID field
> > (in Line1 tab), asterisk receives a REGISTER message like :
> > handle_request_re
Thanks that's exactly what I was looking for! I had seen a patch for it but
did not notice this was in the main trunk.
l.
2009/12/14 Stephen Davies
> What you are missing is the new state-interface parameter to
> AddQueueMember.
>
> You can't use functions in a hint exten.
>
> Steve
>
--
Low
I am actually deploying on a 1.6.1.6 but it does not seem to work - maybe I
am using a wrong syntax?.
pbx-ch*CLI> core show version
Asterisk 1.6.1.6 built by root @ pbx-ch on a i686 running Linux on
2009-09-11 16:54:55 UTC
I see this works:
exten => 100,hint,SIP/${EXTENSION}
pbx-ch*CLI> core sh
Some recent issues I had with hardware seem to come back to not
understanding two very similarly named files:
/etc/asterisk/dahdi-channels.conf
/etc/asterisk/chan_dahdi.conf
I've modified the chan_dahdi.conf to work now, but it would appear all I
needed to do was include dahdi-channels.conf in ch
Hello,
I'm using Asterisk 1.6.X version and I'm creating IVR. My question : is it
possible create CDR record , before client is exiting from contexts ? My
test dialplan is:
context Sales {
_X. => {
Ringing();
Wait(4);
Answer();
Playback(tt-monkeys);
goto Techs|${EXTEN}|1;
}
}
contex
On 15 Dec 2009, at 10:42, Olivier wrote:
> Unfortunately, it seems macro expansion doesn't occur in Line1 tab :
> when I type $A or $(A) or ${A} or $GPP_A or $UID1 in User ID field
> (in Line1 tab), asterisk receives a REGISTER message like :
> handle_request_register: Registration from '${A} {
Hello,
I could successfully played with General Purpose Parameters (GPP_A, GPP_B)
and a TFTP server : whenever I change a GPP value in a configuration file,
my SPA3102 automatically updates the corresponding value its web server
shows.
My config file is :
myid
myid
I though I could us
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:14:16PM +1100, Alex Samad wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 08:33:56AM +0100, hbk wrote:
[snip]
> My only concern with it - it's not just a voip client, its many other
> things as well. not sure if I want to be a fring user as well as all the
> other memberships I have :
I thought so- the fact the server has 20 different registry entries to 20
different account all at the same ITSP shouldn't matter?
Can't see any DDI info in the SIP headers unfortunately :(
John
2009/12/14 meetmecall
> The easiest solution to deal with this is to have one context with
> differ
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 08:33:56AM +0100, hbk wrote:
> IAXDIAL is free on app store works great on WiFi even true NATs but seem
> blocked for GPRS.
ta
>
> HB
>
[snip]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Well I have a 3gs - will tell you how that goes.
installed (non cracked), but I am on wifi now, easy to con
I'm having a strange problem with a sip client and 2 asterisk servers
connected together with a sip trunk. Here's a rough layout
sip_client -- Asterisk A -[sip trunk] -- Asterisk B
when the sip client tries to dial an extension on Asterisk B, Asterisk
A sends the invite to B using "si
On 1.6.1
Check out 'core show function QUEUE_MEMBER'
Don't have a 1.6.0 box anymore to check.
Alec
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mike Clark
Sent: Tuesday, 15 December 2009 12:59 p.m.
To: Ast
Hello
I want to know that how apps/enter.h data can be generated...
I want to do same for conf-muted / conf-unmuted but not getting idea how
data is generated for muted/unmuted same like apps/enter.h
Help me out...
--
Regards,
Chandrakant Solanki
__
70 matches
Mail list logo
