Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI FXO calls and the 's' extension. No, Jackie-O doesn't work here--it's just an example. Sheesh!

2010-07-02 Thread Steve Edwards
>> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:19:08PM -0500, Karl Fife wrote: >>> Calls that come in on DAHDI FXO ports are routed to [context], >>> extension 's' >>> >>> INSTEAD, I would like to route specific ports to specific extensions, >>> For example: >>> >>> I want DAHDI/1-1 to go to 1234 >>> I want DAHD

[asterisk-users] [asterisk-user] gsmtolin_framein: Invalid GSM data

2010-07-02 Thread Chandrakant Solanki
Hi I have created meetme with 3 user. When i going to mute user it gives following error.. *Asterisk Version : 1.6.2.6* -- Playing 'conf-muted.gsm' (language 'en') [Jul 2 22:46:51] WARNING[10823]: codec_gsm.c:103 gsmtolin_framein: Invalid GSM data (1) [Jul 2 22:46:51] WARNING[10823]: tran

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI FXO calls and the 's' extension. No, Jackie-O doesn't work here--it's just an example. Sheesh!

2010-07-02 Thread Karl Fife
Original Message - From: "Barry Miller" To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 11:53 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI FXO calls and the 's' extension. No,Jackie-O doesn't work here--it's just an example. Sheesh! > On Thu, Ju

Re: [asterisk-users] Update the LCD with the callee's name after dialing

2010-07-02 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:26 PM, wrote: > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Ryan Wagoner > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Sent: Thu, Jul 1, 2010 6:19 pm > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Update the LCD with the callee's name after > dialing > > On Thu, Jul

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk and cisco 2800

2010-07-02 Thread Neeraj Chand
Hi Giorgio, Why don't you terminate calls on the cisco router via SIP? -- Message: 11 Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:54:31 +0200 From: Giorgio Incantalupo Subject: [asterisk-users] asterisk and cisco 2800 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion

Re: [asterisk-users] Warning spamming for any unsynchronized ISDN port with dahdi-2.3.0.1

2010-07-02 Thread Scott Stingel
On 6/30/2010 3:56 PM, Alex Villací­s Lasso wrote: > whenever an ISDN port is in RED alarm (unsynchronized), we get a stream of > warnings in /var/log/asterisk/full that look like this: > > [Jun 30 17:38:41] WARNING[9637] chan_dahdi.c: No D-channels available! > Using Primary channel 78 as D-chan

Re: [asterisk-users] What TERMINAL software do you use for MS Windows platform and WHY?

2010-07-02 Thread Kyle Kienapfel
I use a release of putty called putty tray available at http://haanstra.eu/putty/ for its URL clickability This is what ubuntu does, for some reason not for screen sessions export PROMPT_COMMAND='echo -ne "\033]0;${us...@${hostname}: ${PWD/$HOME/~}\007"' One of the distros sets it so that it says

Re: [asterisk-users] Using AMI Originate to call 2 outside numbers and connect them

2010-07-02 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 01:33:25AM +0300, eyal goltzman wrote: > Hello, > > Can I use AMI Originate to call 2 outside numbers (SIP) and connect them? > How? Originate one channel to the application Dial to dial to the other channel? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabb

[asterisk-users] Using AMI Originate to call 2 outside numbers and connect them

2010-07-02 Thread eyal goltzman
Hello, Can I use AMI Originate to call 2 outside numbers (SIP) and connect them? How? Thanks Eyal -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webina

Re: [asterisk-users] iptables/ blocking brute-force attacks, and so on...

2010-07-02 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
On 07/02/2010 10:10 AM, Gordon Henderson wrote: > > I've just posted this to another list where we were talking about the same > old issues we've been plagues with recently - I'd already posted some > iptables rules, but added more to it for this... > > This script probably isn't compatable with an

Re: [asterisk-users] iptables/ blocking brute-force attacks, and so on...

2010-07-02 Thread Steve Edwards
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Gordon Henderson wrote: > The file is at http://unicorn.drogon.net/firewall2 Lots of cool stuff in here. It's going to take a bit to understand it all :) -- Thanks in advance, - Steve Edwards sedwa

Re: [asterisk-users] Non-native codecs - MELPe?

2010-07-02 Thread Jeff Brower
Kyle- C5441 is a year 2000 DSP chip. If you're considering the hardware/TI DSP chip path, C64x or C64x+ series is higher performance (higher channel capacity) and more relevant in terms of available suppliers, forum tech support, TI support, etc. -Jeff Kyle Kienapfel wrote: > > For those cod

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk header files for Debian Lenny 1.6.1.20

2010-07-02 Thread unserossi
> but i can't find header-files or dev-files there. > include folder -- It's that easy? Ok, so stupid question from me. But thanks for your help. = -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk header files for Debian Lenny 1.6.1.20

2010-07-02 Thread Paul Belanger
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:51 PM, wrote: > but i can't find header-files or dev-files there. > include folder -- Paul Belanger | dCAP Polybeacon | Consultant Jabber: paul.belan...@polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) blog.polybeacon.com -- ___

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk header files for Debian Lenny 1.6.1.20

2010-07-02 Thread Danny Nicholas
_ From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of unsero...@aol.com Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 12:52 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk header files for Debian Lenny 1.6.1.20 >

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk header files for Debian Lenny 1.6.1.20

2010-07-02 Thread unserossi
> This are the header files for 1.4, not for 1.6. > Then how did you install asterisk 1.6? -- from here http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asterisk/asterisk-1.6.1-current.tar.gz but i can't find header-files or dev-files there. --

Re: [asterisk-users] iptables/ blocking brute-force attacks, and so on...

2010-07-02 Thread Steve Edwards
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Gordon Henderson wrote: > I'll call this activity "slamming". At least in the US, slamming already has a specific telephony meaning. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_slamming -- Thanks in advance, ---

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk header files for Debian Lenny 1.6.1.20

2010-07-02 Thread Paul Belanger
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:38 PM, wrote: > This are the header files for 1.4, not for 1.6. > Then how did you install asterisk 1.6? -- Paul Belanger | dCAP Polybeacon | Consultant Jabber: paul.belan...@polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) blog.polybeacon.com -- __

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk header files for Debian Lenny 1.6.1.20

2010-07-02 Thread unserossi
-Original Message- From: Paul Belanger To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Sent: Fri, Jul 2, 2010 7:35 pm Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk header files for Debian Lenny 1.6.1.20 On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:22 PM, wrote: > Where can i get the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk header files for Debian Lenny 1.6.1.20

2010-07-02 Thread Paul Belanger
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:22 PM, wrote: > Where can i get the header files Asterisk 1.6.1.20 for Debian Lenny? > $ apt-get install asterisk-dev -- Paul Belanger | dCAP Polybeacon | Consultant Jabber: paul.belan...@polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) blog.polybeacon.com --

Re: [asterisk-users] Brute force attacks

2010-07-02 Thread A J Stiles
On Friday 02 Jul 2010, Tim Nelson wrote: > - "A J Stiles" wrote: > > On Friday 02 Jul 2010, Ira wrote: > > > At 11:14 PM 7/1/2010, you wrote: > > > >Same activity from these IPs: > > > >174.129.137.135 > > > > > > Given that my Asterisk box is used for nothing but Asterisk and I > > > know the

[asterisk-users] Asterisk header files for Debian Lenny 1.6.1.20

2010-07-02 Thread unserossi
Hi, one question again from an asterisk newbie. Where can i get the header files Asterisk 1.6.1.20 for Debian Lenny? I need them to install chan_capi for my Diva E1 Server Card. Thanks in advance. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocati

[asterisk-users] iptables/ blocking brute-force attacks, and so on...

2010-07-02 Thread Gordon Henderson
I've just posted this to another list where we were talking about the same old issues we've been plagues with recently - I'd already posted some iptables rules, but added more to it for this... This script probably isn't compatable with anything else, but I don't run anything else. It's also d

Re: [asterisk-users] Brute force attacks

2010-07-02 Thread Tim Nelson
- "A J Stiles" wrote: > On Friday 02 Jul 2010, Ira wrote: > > At 11:14 PM 7/1/2010, you wrote: > > >Same activity from these IPs: > > >174.129.137.135 > > > > Given that my Asterisk box is used for nothing but Asterisk and I > > know the small number of IPs that need to have access is there an

[asterisk-users] asterisk and cisco 2800

2010-07-02 Thread Giorgio Incantalupo
Hi all, I need to connect my Asterisk 1.4.26 with a Sangoma PRI card (configures with signalling=pri_net)) to a Cisco 2800 PBX. After connecting the cables everything seems fine (ifconfig w2g1 is ok, wanpipemonitor gives no errros, the span is up and active, green light on the card) but when I

Re: [asterisk-users] Brute force attacks

2010-07-02 Thread A J Stiles
On Friday 02 Jul 2010, Ira wrote: > At 11:14 PM 7/1/2010, you wrote: > >Same activity from these IPs: > >174.129.137.135 > > Given that my Asterisk box is used for nothing but Asterisk and I > know the small number of IPs that need to have access is there an > easy way to use iptables to block ever

Re: [asterisk-users] Brute force attacks

2010-07-02 Thread Zeeshan Zakaria
Hi Matt, What eaxtly you mean by Fail2ban crapping out? I never had any problem with it, and for me it is not only protecting asterisk, but also multiple websites for wrong logging attempts, spams and SQL injections. Based on your experience I would like to see if I need to be careful with its set

Re: [asterisk-users] Brute force attacks

2010-07-02 Thread Matt Desbiens
I've noticed from time to time, that fail2ban just craps out, so, this might be of interest to the community assuming you use 192.168.100.0/24 on your network iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.100.0/24 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -s carrierip.x.x.x -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1 -j ACCEPT

Re: [asterisk-users] Brute force attacks

2010-07-02 Thread Ira
At 11:14 PM 7/1/2010, you wrote: >Same activity from these IPs: >174.129.137.135 Given that my Asterisk box is used for nothing but Asterisk and I know the small number of IPs that need to have access is there an easy way to use iptables to block everything but those 6 IPs and provider addresse

Re: [asterisk-users] Voiceprompts i.e. voicemail and conferencing in multiple codecs

2010-07-02 Thread Steve Edwards
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Kenny Watson wrote: > for i in `ls -R /var/lib/asterisk/sounds/uk/*wav`; # do recursive ls and > only list wav files and loop through each one > do # start do loop > CONV=`echo $i|sed 's/.wav/.g729/g'` # set CONV variable as filename with > wav swapped for G729 >

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfer fails

2010-07-02 Thread Jonas Kellens
Danny, thank you for you feedback. I have the following setting in sip.conf : limitonpeer = yes and for every sip peer definition I have : asterisk*CLI> sip show peer test1 * Name : test1 Realtime peer: Yes, cached Secret : MD5Secret: Context : from-TEST Su

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-02 Thread Danny Nicholas
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tilghman Lesher Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 3:55 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issu

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfer fails

2010-07-02 Thread Danny Nicholas
_ From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jonas Kellens Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 4:09 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Transfer fails Hello list, this i

[asterisk-users] Fax T.38 passthrough failing after upgrade

2010-07-02 Thread Elliot Murdock
Hello all! After a recent upgrade of Asterisk 1.4.18 to 1.4.33.1, everything looks ok, except when fax T.38 calls are being passed through the server, the fax transmission fails, giving a "train failure" message when invoking "fax show stats" in the fax server (Asterisk 1.6.0.26). Rxfax and Txfax

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-02 Thread Steve Howes
On 2 Jul 2010, at 13:31, unsero...@aol.com wrote: > I just did not want to spam the list with useless content but just reply to > you as you attacked me. > This was the reason i only replied to you and not to the whole list. > But as i realised now it seems to be usual to spam the whole mailing

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-02 Thread unserossi
I just did not want to spam the list with useless content but just reply to you as you attacked me. This was the reason i only replied to you and not to the whole list. But as i realised now it seems to be usual to spam the whole mailing list with useless information like your mail (or this mail

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-02 Thread Steve Howes
On 2 Jul 2010, at 12:29, John Novack wrote: > regardless, people will post either way, and wasting archive space > complaining about either one is pointless. I was mainly pissed off about him directly replying to people (i.e. me) rather than the list. It was you lot that started the religious

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-02 Thread John Novack
Tilghman Lesher wrote: > On Thursday 01 July 2010 20:45:14 John Novack wrote: > >> John Ervin wrote: >> >>> Where are the rules for posting in this discussion group? Just curious. >>> >>> It's a rule on this list, although it's frequently ignored. >> Further s

[asterisk-users] Difference in dahdi between 1.4.x and trunk?

2010-07-02 Thread Jay R. Worthington
Hi Guy's, i'm having a wheird problem with an asterisk-trunk installation, dahdi via hfc-s sounds extremely distorted, but the same installation (same libpri, same dahdi etc) is ok with asterisk 1.4. I dont see any errors, neighter on the console nor the error logs. Any ideas what was changed? The

Re: [asterisk-users] Voiceprompts i.e. voicemail and conferencing in multiple codecs

2010-07-02 Thread Kenny Watson
- Original Message - From: "Paul Belanger" To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Tuesday, 29 June, 2010 10:22:18 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Voiceprompts i.e. voicemail and conferencing in multiple codecs On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Kenny W

[asterisk-users] Transfer fails

2010-07-02 Thread Jonas Kellens
Hello list, this is the dialplan : exten => s,n,Dial(SIP/test1&SIP/test2,,t) exten => 10,1,Dial(SIP/test1) exten => 20,1,Dial(SIP/test2) So there is an incoming call that rings SIPaccounts test1 and test2. Account test1 answers and wants to transfer the call to test2. Transfer is : #20 Thi

Re: [asterisk-users] GotoIfTime problem

2010-07-02 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Thursday 01 July 2010 21:59:21 Zhang Shukun wrote: > hi, all > > recently, i face a GotoIfTime problem > > GotoIfTime("08:00:00-07:00:00,mon-sun,*,*?95040263008,start") > > as you can see the section is 08:00:00-07:00:00 , which is the begin > time is later than the end time > > what's this

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-02 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Thursday 01 July 2010 20:45:14 John Novack wrote: > John Ervin wrote: > > Where are the rules for posting in this discussion group? Just curious. > > > >> It's a rule on this list, although it's frequently ignored. > > Further searching shows there is NO written rule regarding top bottom or > e

Re: [asterisk-users] RE How to break pri DID to multiple SIP Trunks

2010-07-02 Thread Samantha
David I am using FREEPBX/TRIXBOX Sam From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Dovid Bender Sent: Wednesday, 30 June 2010 8:53 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users