Hello list,
I'm using asterisk 1.4.30 and realtime sip.
I notice that the field "musiconhold" is not working as when putting
someone on hold, the default musiconhold class is always used.
musiconhold.conf :
[default]
mode=files
directory=/var/lib/asterisk/moh
random=yes
;
[106002]
mode=fi
Hello list,
when putting the class 'default' in comment, then this happens :
[Aug 13 12:36:34] WARNING[21172]: res_musiconhold.c:666 get_mohbyname:
Music on Hold class 'default' not found
[Aug 13 12:36:34] -- Started music on hold, class '106002', on
SIP/test2-0001
[Aug 13 12:36:34] WA
Asterisk can convert from wav but it still needs to be in the correct
format. See
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Convert+WAV+audio+files+for+use+in+Asterisk
Jonas Kellens wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> when putting the class 'default' in comment, then this happens :
>
> [Aug 13 12:36:3
1. the converting is not working
[r...@asterisk testing]# file 01Long.wav
01Long.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, 20294 channels
1414676809 Hz
[r...@asterisk testing]# asterisk -rx "file convert
/var/lib/asterisk/testing/01Long.wav /var/lib/asterisk/testing/01Long.alaw"
Unable to
They mean PhonePayPlus (formerly ICSTIS). www.phonepayplus.org.uk
I am not aware of them certifying particular phone systems. Rather, they
impose certain requirements and obligations on the service provider
depending on the nature of the service being provided and the number range
it is provided o
The wav file is not in the correct format. Also the number of channels
and sampling frequency it is reporting is complete nonsense. This is
what it should display:-
RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 8000 Hz
Jonas Kellens wrote:
>
> 1. the converting is not worki
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Faris Raouf wrote:
> They mean PhonePayPlus (formerly ICSTIS). www.phonepayplus.org.uk
> I am not aware of them certifying particular phone systems. Rather, they
> impose certain requirements and obligations on the service provider
> depending on the natur
Hi.
I've been working with Asterisk for a few month now with great results.
I'm very happy with this product. I hope I can be of help in the future of
this project.
Right now I'm having some problems installing it in a new server.
I wont bore you with details because finally the solution to my pro
Albert Bonomo wrote:
> Hi.
> I've been working with Asterisk for a few month now with great results.
> I'm very happy with this product. I hope I can be of help in the
> future of this project.
> Right now I'm having some problems installing it in a new server.
>
> I wont bore you with details b
On 13 Aug 2010, at 14:08, Albert Bonomo wrote:
> How come nowhere in the internet, nor in Digium.com docs, blogs, or whatever,
> anybody mention that yum install is available ? Why nobody ever make a small
> note telling that asterisk is available from repositories to install, and
> that is so e
I am looking to build a small PBX for an office that has 3 incoming analog
lines and less than 10 extensions.
For the Asterisk server I am going to use a small form factor PC with no-PCI
slots so the FXO interface needs to be either FXO->SIP or USB. Can anyone
make suggestions?
I am look
We use the Sangoma PRI/E1 cards and they work perfectly. If I wanted a
USB based analogue solution I would go straight for the U100.
Eric Merkel (Mail Lists) wrote:
>
>
> I am looking to build a small PBX for an office that has 3 incoming
> analog lines and less than 10 extensions.
>
>
>
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Eric Merkel (Mail Lists)
wrote:
>
>
> I am looking to build a small PBX for an office that has 3 incoming analog
> lines and less than 10 extensions.
For that small of an installation you might prefer an asterisk
appliance. You can review the archives, or ask for
Hi, I'm trying to install Asterisk with yum.
I have followed the instructions on http://www.asterisk.org/downloads/yum
I discovered that the repositories that describe there, don't exist.
So thar running yum install asterisk16 won't install al all.
Some guy from Fedora mailing list suggested me to
it would be far easier to just use the source...
but...
yum search asterisk
might get you on your way, although i can't see anything that looks like
samples in there.
On 13 August 2010 19:08, Albert Bonomo wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to install Asterisk with yum.
> I have followed the instruction
Albert Bonomo wrote:
>
> How come nowhere in the internet, nor in Digium.com docs, blogs, or
> whatever,
> anybody mention that yum install is available ? Why nobody ever make a
> small
Because Digium didn't make them, the Fedora community did.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
"Those who would g
Albert Bonomo wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to install Asterisk with yum.
> I have followed the instructions on http://www.asterisk.org/downloads/yum
When you use pre-packaged software, then you limit yourself to waiting
for help from those that are familiar with your package management.
Doug
--
Be
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Doug Lytle
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] install asterisk
For another testimony; I tried Fedora and Debian about 9 months ago before
settling on CENTOS to get Lumenvox to work. CENTOS wo
Well, I did tried using the source but couldn't make it work.
some problem with dependencies and kernel version.
It is really difficult to put all the stuff in order to make a source work.
2010/8/13 Geraint Lee
> it would be far easier to just use the source...
>
> but...
>
> yum search asteris
Zypper did the trick for me, but that was on SUSE/CENTOS.
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Albert Bonomo
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 1:56 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subjec
On 08/12/2010 09:08 AM, unsero...@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> using Asterisk 1.8 beta3 installed from scratch I am not able to
> stop/start/restart Asterisk deamon with
>>
>> /etc/init.d/asterisk stop|start|restart
>>
>> It just happens nothing, no warnings, errors etc.
>
> Next step: st
Albert Bonomo wrote:
>
> Well, I did tried using the source but couldn't make it work.
> some problem with dependencies and kernel version.
> It is really difficult to put all the stuff in order to make a source
> work.
Albert,
It's really not that difficult if your system is in decent shape.
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> PhonepayPlus are the 'regulator' for premium phone services in the UK
> (well they're independent but work with Ofcom the regulator).
>
> It depends on what services you're offering, but the rules are pretty
> stringent to stop fraudulent use of PRS nu
Does anyone have any feelings one way or the other about running Asterisk on
AMD vs running Asterisk on Intel?
Thanks,
Lyle J. McKarns
---
Networking/Linux Engineering Team
n|m Nexus Management
4 Industrial Parkway
Suite 101
Brunswick, Maine 04011
Tel (USA
Matthew,
You are right. I should fix my system first. It's a mess. I wasn't aware of
that until I started to work with it.
I know that asterisk is not so difficult to install form sources. I did it
once with no problem at all.
But I don't know why, this time my system is messed up. I sent the probl
Greetings:
We have been running a CVS HEAD version of asterisk from Mar 10, 2005
on ix86 (PIII-600) Linux 2.4.27 with ixj (chan_phone) hardware. In a
hope of getting better 'chan_skinny' support (to attempt using a Cisco
7920 IP phone) I built asterisk 1.2.40 on this box. Initial tests
verify tha
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:20:15PM -0400, Lyle McKarns wrote:
> Does anyone have any feelings one way or the other about running
> Asterisk on AMD vs running Asterisk on Intel?
Yes, a AMD Phenon will way out-perform an Intel Atom.
Now, could you please be more specific?
--
Tzafri
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:08:37AM -0300, Albert Bonomo wrote:
> Here is my question.
> My first install experience was quit a headache. I downloaded the sources
> from Digium,
> make them and after that make install them. Before that, I had to install
> all the dependencies
> bison, ncurses, zlib
2010/8/13 Lyle McKarns :
> Does anyone have any feelings one way or the other about running Asterisk on
> AMD vs running Asterisk on Intel?
Only political feelings. I want to support AMD so there's at least
some token competition for Intel.
Both companies make nice 6-core processors with a lot of
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 03:13:53PM -0500, Infra wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> We have been running a CVS HEAD version of asterisk from Mar 10, 2005
> on ix86 (PIII-600) Linux 2.4.27
Wow!
> with ixj (chan_phone) hardware. In a
> hope of getting better 'chan_skinny' support (to attempt using a Cisco
>
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Lyle McKarns wrote:
> Does anyone have any feelings one way or the other about running
> Asterisk on AMD vs running Asterisk on Intel?
I'm running lots of installations on an AMD Geode...
Gordon
--
_
-- B
Mostly I was wondering if there are any reasons I cannot
1) Use and AMD board and
2) Run a mixed Intel/AMD enviroment
Thanks,
Lyle J. McKarns
---
Networking/Linux Engineering Team
n|m Nexus Management
4 Industrial Parkway
Suite 101
Brunswick, Maine 04011
Tzafrir, I wasn't following one document. I read a lot and made my own
tutorial
following many tutorials found on the way.
The version I was installed was 1.4
I have the sources so I tried to use the same version.
So I followed the same procedure that worked for mi last time.
Mi problem is not wi
At 15:48 8/13/2010, Lyle McKarns wrote:
>Mostly I was wondering if there are any reasons I cannot
>1) Use and AMD board and
>2) Run a mixed Intel/AMD enviroment
>
>Thanks,
>Lyle J. McKarns
All our Asterisk boxes are AMD. If AMD were to
disappear, Intel would not have their feet to
the compe
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:52:20PM -0300, Albert Bonomo wrote:
> Tzafrir, I wasn't following one document. I read a lot and made my own
> tutorial
> following many tutorials found on the way.
>
> The version I was installed was 1.4
> I have the sources so I tried to use the same version.
> So I fo
On 13/08/10 14:08, Albert Bonomo wrote:
> This time, the server was up with Fedora 13. No problem.
> Well not so fast. Yes problem !!! I can not install it !!!
Fedora is *not* a server operating system and not one I would choose to
run asterisk on.
I would recommend using either CentOS or a Debi
36 matches
Mail list logo
