List,
I'm trying to obtain the Call ID, From tag and To tag of the SIP calls from
Asterisk, to store them on a CDR and be able to conciliate with another CDR
system ( opensips )
I have been able to obtain the SIP Call ID CDR(sip_callid)=${SIPCALLID}
I was wondering if there's any way to obtain t
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 09:07 +0100, Ishfaq Malik wrote:
> Are you suggesting that there are no bugs in 1.4 or 1.6?
I presume that you are aware of the fact that it is impossible to prove
the absence of "bugs" in any piece of software
You might not have detected them yet.
Furthermore behaviour t
Why not setup a default catch-all route that goes to either your main line (to
drive sales) or a pre-recorded message (the number you dialed is
disconnected...etc), and then setup more specific pattern matches for assigned
numbers? I've done this before for clients that have large blocks of did
(reposted with correct subject line, I think messing up the subject
line last time prevented my question from being read. Cheers :)
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Jesse Thompson wrote:
>> Letting a carrier use you as a carrier seems like quite a bad idea
>> generally..
>
> I think I would agre
Paul Belanger writes:
> Sounds like asterisk was not told to generate a coredump, add the
> following, then you can generate a backtrace[1]:
>
> asterisk.conf
> [options]
> dumpcore = yes
The challenge with Asterisk and core dumps is that the Asterisk user
often does not have permissions to writ
I don't know the statistics involved, but not allowing the compiler to optimize
would almost assuredly have some negative effect on performance
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2011, at 10:16 AM, satish patel wrote:
> But anyway let me set coredump=yes in asterisk.conf
>
> Do you think its a go
But anyway let me set coredump=yes in asterisk.conf
Do you think its a good idea to compile with "DON'T OPTIMIZED" option in
production ? does it impact on performance ?
-S
CC: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
From: sherwood.mcgo...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 10:13:31 -0500
To: asterisk-
No, it just means that the coredump will not have information that is as useful
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2011, at 10:02 AM, satish patel wrote:
> Sherwood,
>
> I was wrong here
> >>But unfortunately i compiled with "DON'T OPTIMIZED" option do you think it
> >>will generate dumpcore in t
Sherwood,
I was wrong here
>>But unfortunately i compiled with "DON'T OPTIMIZED" option do you
think it will generate dumpcore in that case ?
I have just cross check and we have option OPTIMIZED. That mean don't create
coredump right ?
-S
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:53:01 -0500
From: s
On 06/03/2011 09:52 AM, Eric Wieling wrote:
What version of Asterisk does Switchvox use?
Switchvox 4.x and 5.0 are based on Asterisk Business Edition C.3, which
was originally Asterisk 1.4 but contains a great deal of functionality
from later open source Asterisk releases as well.
--
Kevin
On 6/3/2011 9:49 AM, satish patel wrote:
But unfortunately i compiled with "DON'T OPTIMIZED" option do you
think it will generate dumpcore in that case ?
Yes, it will create a coredump. Telling the compiler to not optimize
(IIRC) leaves more debugging info in the binary for dumps
--
__
> -Original Message-
> From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
> Kevin P. Fleming
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 11:51 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] benefits of asterisk 1.8
>
But unfortunately i compiled with "DON'T OPTIMIZED" option do you think it will
generate dumpcore in that case ?
> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 10:44:20 -0400
> From: pabelan...@digium.com
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] benefits of asterisk 1.8
>
> On 11-06-03 0
On 11-06-03 07:30 AM, Satish Patel wrote:
Yesterday my 1.8 got crashed and I have nothing in log or anywhere which
I can show you or submit bug. Kinda funny :(
Sounds like asterisk was not told to generate a coredump, add the
following, then you can generate a backtrace[1]:
asterisk.conf
[opt
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Nikhil wrote:
I am using 1.4 asterisk and asterisk GUI. If I do moh upload its is not
working .help me on this
Not unless you provide some details.
What's not working? Is the file not being uploaded? Is the file not being
uploaded to the correct directory? Is the file in
Hey Guy,
I want to implement Queue base custom ring tone so Agent will get aware of
incoming call for sale or tech etc.. I know its possible with SIPAddHeader
http://www.technicallyamusing.com/?p=44
I am confused here
We already have alertInfo set to "Ring Answer" how should i use both r
On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Satish Barot wrote:
> With due respect to Digium work, are there no issues with Asterisk 1.8?
> https://issues.asterisk.org/view_all_bug_page.php
And the first of those is a real show stopper at least for us. We've got to
have multiple parking lots and that has bee
Yeah I am using a TDM410P, thanks for the answer.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:30 AM, A J Stiles wrote:
> On Thursday 02 Jun 2011, khalid touati wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> > Actually My question is as in the subject, may I use a regular phone line
> > to receive faxes with FFA (Fax For Asterisk), I am us
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, devr devr wrote:
thanks for your reply
This is the details I get
Locality
Alloa, Clackmannanshire
An intersting place... I spent my youth in a small town near there. (Not
that Alloa is a particularly big town to start with!) Central Scotland.
Full of history and places
On 3 Jun 2011, at 11:57, devr devr wrote:
> My query now is willl all voxbone numbers show up as the operator as Voxbone
> SA as above. I wanted to find out who the service provider is on some
> numbers, I suspected the service to be voxbone but the operator shows as
> other companies.
>
> My
Yesterday my 1.8 got crashed and I have nothing in log or anywhere
which I can show you or submit bug. Kinda funny :(
--
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Satish Barot
wrote:
If 1.8 doesn't panic for subset of PBX features for someone, you can
not say it is stable. You s
thanks for your reply
This is the details I get
Locality
Alloa, Clackmannanshire
Charging
B1 National
Operator
Voxbone SA
Locality
Alloa, Clackmannanshire
Charging
B1 National
Operator
Voxbone SA
My query now is willl all voxbone numbers show up as the operator as Voxbone
Voxbone works correctly, no problem, the only problem is that you need
to spend a minimum amount of 500€/month to open an account...
Best regards,
Olivier
Le 3/06/11 11:58, randulo a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:28 AM, devr devr wrote:
I am thinking about using numbers from voxbone. Be
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:28 AM, devr devr wrote:
> I am thinking about using numbers from voxbone. Before I make up my mind if
> this is the right service for me I want to know what kinds of details will
> be found when checking up on a voxbone number.
>
> I am interested in UK numbers. Can anyon
I am thinking about using numbers from voxbone. Before I make up my mind if
this is the right service for me I want to know what kinds of details will be
found when checking up on a voxbone number.
I am interested in UK numbers. Can anyone give an example on an actual voxbone
number in service
I am thinking about using numbers from voxbone. Before I make up my mind if
this is the right service for me I want to know what kinds of details will be
found when checking up on a voxbone number.
I am interested in UK numbers. Can anyone give an example on an actual voxbone
number in servic
If 1.8 doesn't panic for subset of PBX features for someone, you can not say
it is stable. You should also look at other
features and how they work with 1.8.
I didn't say 1.4 or 1.6 have no bugs or issues. When there were 1.4 or 1.6.0
branches, they did have bugs. But since people
started submit
On Thursday 02 Jun 2011, khalid touati wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> Actually My question is as in the subject, may I use a regular phone line
> to receive faxes with FFA (Fax For Asterisk), I am using asterisk 1.6.2.8.
Yes, you can. BUT, you will need some sort of FXO interface (allows the
computer to c
Are you suggesting that there are no bugs in 1.4 or 1.6?
Currently there seems to be a fear of 1.8. We're about to put it into
production and yes, we've had issues with it, mostly due to the fact we
use RealTime, but before you change anything it is always advisable to
test the hell out of it.
To
On 06/01/2011 05:42 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:10:34PM +0200, randall wrote:
>> On 06/01/2011 03:55 PM, randall wrote:
>>> On 06/01/2011 03:41 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 08:06:02AM +0200, randall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After running fi
Hi am
I am using 1.4 asterisk and asterisk GUI. If I do moh upload its is
not working .help me on this
Thanks
Nikhil
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a liv
31 matches
Mail list logo
