Re: [asterisk-users] Cut off + sign in telephonenumber

2012-03-21 Thread Jonas Kellens
${FILTER(0-9,${cid})} works. Thanks. Jonas. On 03/20/2012 06:02 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: Since you never know when you will actually use one of these, I tried it this way in 10.1.3 exten = 1238,1,answer exten = 1238,n,Set(cid=+9600) exten = 1238,n,saynumber(${cid2) exten =

Re: [asterisk-users] All circuits are busy now on outgoing trunk call

2012-03-21 Thread James Mutuku
I am still getting the same error On 3/21/12, white hat whitehat...@gmail.com wrote: Just a guess here, but it looks like you are dialing a 10 digit phone number but the dial pattern in your outbound route does not handle that. Try using a different dial pattern in your outbound route such

Re: [asterisk-users] All circuits are busy now on outgoing trunk call

2012-03-21 Thread James Mutuku
my sip traces are below Using SIP RTP TOS bits 184 == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 Audio is at 192.168.9.250 port 17722 Adding codec 0x4 (ulaw) to SDP Adding codec 0x8 (alaw) to SDP Adding codec 0x2 (gsm) to SDP Adding non-codec 0x1 (telephone-event) to SDP Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to

Re: [asterisk-users] All circuits are busy now on outgoing trunk call

2012-03-21 Thread Michael L. Young
[0K --- SIP read from UDP:192.168.9.251:5060 --- SIP/2.0 404 Not Found Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.9.250:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK111ef687 To: sip:0722490994@192.168.9.251;tag=1332328154302b4aa3-f15d-4eb7-beee-97782e7cbd06 From: pbxserver sip:Unknown@192.168.9.250;tag=as66c75bd7

Re: [asterisk-users] All circuits are busy now on outgoing trunk call

2012-03-21 Thread James Mutuku
I am setting up asterisk-fxo gw. 404 Not Found (User not found) means the user is not found, but I don't need to have extensions or authentication on the fxo gw On 3/21/12, Michael L. Young myo...@acsacc.com wrote: [0K --- SIP read from UDP:192.168.9.251:5060 --- SIP/2.0 404 Not Found Via:

[asterisk-users] fallback to default extension

2012-03-21 Thread Paolo Supino
Hi I was asked by our development departement to setup asterisk in a manner that if someone calls an extension in the department that was was only configured, but a handset was never attached to it to fall back to a default extension. For example: Someone calls extension 2408, but there's no

Re: [asterisk-users] fallback to default extension

2012-03-21 Thread Andrew Latham
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Paolo Supino paolo.sup...@gmail.com wrote: Hi  I was asked by our development departement to setup asterisk in a manner that if someone calls an extension in the department that was was only configured, but a handset was never attached to it to fall back to a

Re: [asterisk-users] fallback to default extension

2012-03-21 Thread Bryant Zimmerman
Paolo You can use exten - i This will catch any invalid extensions that are sent into a context. You could than route the flow as you see fit. Thanks Bryant From: Paolo Supino paolo.sup...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 8:24 AM To:

Re: [asterisk-users] fallback to default extension

2012-03-21 Thread Phil Frost
On Mar 21, 2012, at 08:36 , Andrew Latham wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Paolo Supino paolo.sup...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I was asked by our development departement to setup asterisk in a manner that if someone calls an extension in the department that was was only configured, but a

[asterisk-users] 8-span TE820 card and interrupts

2012-03-21 Thread Tony Mountifield
Over the years I have experienced a few interrupt issues when using some of the Digium E1/T1 cards with Zaptel drivers, and usually resolved them by disabling USB devices in the motherboard BIOS settings. Now more and more systems are coming without PS/2 connections, so USB is needed for the

Re: [asterisk-users] 8-span TE820 card and interrupts

2012-03-21 Thread Andrew Latham
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Tony Mountifield t...@softins.co.uk wrote: Over the years I have experienced a few interrupt issues when using some of the Digium E1/T1 cards with Zaptel drivers, and usually resolved them by disabling USB devices in the motherboard BIOS settings. Now more and

Re: [asterisk-users] All circuits are busy now on outgoing trunk call

2012-03-21 Thread SamyGo
404 NOT FOUND means that they were unable to find any destination/route/rule/prefix match corresponding to your dialled number. See your FXO gateway configuration Web-UI for outbound patterns OR verify that the FXO has its outbound line configured and working properly. On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at

Re: [asterisk-users] All circuits are busy now on outgoing trunk call

2012-03-21 Thread James Mutuku
Hi, I have configured a route on the fxo to send all incoming sip traffic to the fxo ports. I will try set the specific digits and see. On 3/21/12, SamyGo govoi...@gmail.com wrote: 404 NOT FOUND means that they were unable to find any destination/route/rule/prefix match corresponding to your

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8, busylevel and CCBS

2012-03-21 Thread Sergio Serrano
My question is so complex and I try to explain well. We have a customer that he wants limits incoming calls to his extensions to only one. That's not complicated with GROUPCOUNT, DEVICE_STATE or SIPPEER with curcalls option.But the problem is when you want implement CCBS service. If we have

Re: [asterisk-users] fallback to default extension

2012-03-21 Thread Eric Wieling
Extension i only works for IVRs and other things like Background and WaitExten, it does not work to match incoming calls to an invalid extension. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Bryant

Re: [asterisk-users] fallback to default extension

2012-03-21 Thread Rennes Neps
Hey, I would also recommend to use SIPPEER and with that verify the status of said peer. Based on that status, make the dialling decision. If you want more help, contact me directly. Rennes Neps Elion Ettevõtted AS tel: +372 6402183 mob: +372 56490388 rennes.n...@elion.ee -Original

Re: [asterisk-users] Which SIP phone comply with COLP feature

2012-03-21 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Am 20.03.12 10:15, schrieb Olivier: Hi, I would like to test the following COLP use case : Alice and Bob are both using a SIP phone registered on a Asterisk 10 server. Alice dials Bob's extension. While Bob's phone is ringing, Asterisk updates Alice phone screen with Bob's name, so that

Re: [asterisk-users] 8-span TE820 card and interrupts

2012-03-21 Thread Shaun Ruffell
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:45:37PM +, Tony Mountifield wrote: Over the years I have experienced a few interrupt issues when using some of the Digium E1/T1 cards with Zaptel drivers, and usually resolved them by disabling USB devices in the motherboard BIOS settings. Now more and more

Re: [asterisk-users] 8-span TE820 card and interrupts

2012-03-21 Thread Steve Edwards
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Shaun Ruffell wrote: 240 channels in meetme comming from an 8-span digital card? I would have to measure it...but my guess is a pretty beefy system. In this configuration, more speed on less cores would serve you better than more cores. Would that advice apply if the

Re: [asterisk-users] 8-span TE820 card and interrupts

2012-03-21 Thread Shaun Ruffell
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 08:23:48AM -0700, Steve Edwards wrote: On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Shaun Ruffell wrote: 240 channels in meetme comming from an 8-span digital card? I would have to measure it...but my guess is a pretty beefy system. In this configuration, more speed on less cores would serve

[asterisk-users] Bridging an Answered call in Asterisk with another call

2012-03-21 Thread Jayesh Nambiar
Hello All, I need to know a way of connecting an Answered call in Asterisk to another call which was triggered by an AMI. I have a scenario as follows: 1) User dials 123 from a touch screen Polycom phone. 2) Call comes to Asterisk and Asterisk answers the call and asks for PIN number. 3) Once the

Re: [asterisk-users] 8-span TE820 card and interrupts

2012-03-21 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article 20120321151844.ga11...@digium.com, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:45:37PM +, Tony Mountifield wrote: Over the years I have experienced a few interrupt issues when using some of the Digium E1/T1 cards with Zaptel drivers, and usually

Re: [asterisk-users] 8-span TE820 card and interrupts

2012-03-21 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 03/21/2012 11:17 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: 240 channels in meetme comming from an 8-span digital card? I would have to measure it...but my guess is a pretty beefy system. In this configuration, more speed on less cores would serve you better than more cores. Yes, I wondered about that,

Re: [asterisk-users] Which SIP phone comply with COLP feature

2012-03-21 Thread Olivier
2012/3/21, Stefan Schmidt s...@sil.at: Am 20.03.12 10:15, schrieb Olivier: Hi, I would like to test the following COLP use case : Alice and Bob are both using a SIP phone registered on a Asterisk 10 server. Alice dials Bob's extension. While Bob's phone is ringing, Asterisk updates Alice

[asterisk-users] Asterisk generating backtrace

2012-03-21 Thread Jonas Kellens
Hello, when generating backtrace I get following output : /[root@sip ~]# gdb -se asterisk -ex bt full -ex thread apply all bt --batch -c core.sip-2012-03-21T10\:57\:29+0100 /root/backtrace.txt asterisk: No such file or directory./ /warning: no loadable sections found in added symbol-file

Re: [asterisk-users] fallback to default extension

2012-03-21 Thread Paolo Supino
H Andrew Your solution is the simplest I received and so I tried implementing it only to discover that it doesn't work as expected... TIA Paolo On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Andrew Latham lath...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Paolo Supino paolo.sup...@gmail.com

Re: [asterisk-users] fallback to default extension

2012-03-21 Thread Andrew Latham
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Paolo Supino paolo.sup...@gmail.com wrote: H Andrew Your solution is the simplest I received and so I tried implementing it only to discover that it doesn't work as expected... TIA Paolo snip Check your Dial() options... Verify your options to you

Re: [asterisk-users] fallback to default extension

2012-03-21 Thread Paolo Supino
Hi I've pretty much have it setup properly with the following: exten = _24XX,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN},30) exten = _24XX,n,GotoIf($${DIALSTATUS}=CHANUNAVAIL?noconn:conn) exten = _24XX,n(noconn),Dial(SIP/2400) exten = _24XX,n(conn),hangup() The only problem is that if 2400 rejects the call asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] fallback to default extension

2012-03-21 Thread Bryant Zimmerman
From: Paolo Supino paolo.sup...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:40 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] fallback to default extension Hi I've pretty

Re: [asterisk-users] fallback to default extension

2012-03-21 Thread Bryant Zimmerman
Minor Correction Hi I've pretty much have it setup properly with the following: exten = _24XX,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN},30) exten = _24XX,n,GotoIf($${DIALSTATUS}=CHANUNAVAIL?noconn:conn) exten = _24XX,n(noconn),GotoIf($[${EXTEN}=2400]?conn:force) exten = _24XX,n(force),Dial(SIP/2400) exten =

Re: [asterisk-users] Bridging an Answered call in Asterisk with another call

2012-03-21 Thread Satish Barot
Make your user wait in a *Meetme* and then call your destination number through AMI and once he answers, place him in the same *Meetme*. e.g. Assuming your destination is SIP extension, have something like... Action: Originate Channel: SIP/{your_destination_here} Application: MeetMe Data:

Re: [asterisk-users] Bridging an Answered call in Asterisk with another call

2012-03-21 Thread Jayesh Nambiar
Thank you Satish. I was also thinking on similar lines. I was just wondering if there was any mechanism with which we can bridge a new call with the existing running call if the Call-ID of the call is known !! I can definitely use the confbridge application for the same right; as I am working on