have you seen astmanproxy? best regards
On Sep 23, 2014, at 10:05, jg <webaccounts...@jgoettgens.de> wrote: > Hi! > > Maybe I have overlooked something, but I am sort of facing the following > problem. I always used the AMI interface to allow (older) client programs on > Windows to use their TAPI client code in order to communicate with Asterisk > servers. The functionality is basically minimal as only incoming calls need > to get detected and there are occasional outgoing ones. > > For the outgoing calls, a regular AMI connection is fine, but having a lot of > machines (> 20) maintaining separate TCP connection, just to listen to some > events seems to be too much effort. Does a (read-only) multicast for relevant > events make any sense (except for data protection issues)? > > I am considering writing a small proxy that does exactly that with > correspondig changes for my Telephony Service Provider (TSP). Would it make > any sense to implement this as an option for the Asterisk program? Basically, > Actions and Action responses via TCP and Events via multicast? > > jg > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: > http://www.asterisk.org/hello > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
