[asterisk-users] sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?

2015-02-20 Thread thufir
What's the difference between user "123" and "devries"? Based on the output here, they seem the same..? tleilax*CLI> tleilax*CLI> sip show users Username Secret Accountcode Def.Context ACL Forcerport 201password 201

Re: [asterisk-users] Timer_fd, pthreads, or DAHDI timer for timing under 1.8.11.0?

2015-02-20 Thread Joshua Colp
Stefan Viljoen wrote: Hi guys I have some questions regarding the above 1. Why are there different options for timing? Some systems don't have timerfd, some systems don't have DAHDI. The goal is to have at least some sort of timing module for every system. 2. What are the differences bet

Re: [asterisk-users] sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?

2015-02-20 Thread Andres
On 2/20/15 6:15 AM, thufir wrote: What's the difference between user "123" and "devries"? Based on the output here, they seem the same..? tleilax*CLI> tleilax*CLI> sip show users Username Secret Accountcode Def.Context ACL Forcerport 201

Re: [asterisk-users] Res_fax - FAXOPT(faxdetect)

2015-02-20 Thread Administrator TOOTAI
Le 18/02/2015 18:52, Eric Wieling a écrit : I solved the issue by not answering the call as I assume others have done. The only solution we found is to set faxdetect=no in the sip.conf of the peer definition. The Set(FAXOPT(detect)=[yes|no]) command in the dialplan is not taken in account.

Re: [asterisk-users] sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?

2015-02-20 Thread thufir
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:46:13 -0500, Andres wrote: > A "sip set debug on" will give you more info on why you are getting the > 404. It probably has to do something with your context/dialplan. on tleilax: tleilax*CLI> tleilax*CLI> sip set debug on SIP Debugging enabled tleilax*CLI> on doge:

[asterisk-users] [OT] switches

2015-02-20 Thread thufir
Pardon, this might be off-topic. I'm reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_switch For a setup of ~5 agents, would I be wrong in thinking that a generic 16 port unmanaged switch would fit the bill? The first model to come up for me in an Amazon search is: http://support.netgear.com/pro

Re: [asterisk-users] [OT] switches

2015-02-20 Thread Harry McGregor
Hi, For a very basic setup it would work, but I would suggest POE at a minimum, and vlan support if possible. Gigabit uplinks, 10/100 for the poe ports http://www.amazon.com/NETGEAR-ProSAFE-M4100-D10-POE-Ethernet-Managed/dp/B00AUEYX0Y/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1424462577&sr=8-3&keywords=netgear+

Re: [asterisk-users] sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?

2015-02-20 Thread Andres
On 2/20/15 2:29 PM, thufir wrote: On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:46:13 -0500, Andres wrote: A "sip set debug on" will give you more info on why you are getting the 404. It probably has to do something with your context/dialplan. on tleilax: tleilax*CLI> tleilax*CLI> sip set debug on SIP Debugging

Re: [asterisk-users] sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?

2015-02-20 Thread thufir
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:07:35 -0500, Andres wrote: > This is showing nothing so I don't think your test message even made it > here. I think it looped in the 'doge' server. I was wondering the same thing :) in tleilax, I looked in /var/log/asterisk/messages and see: [Feb 20 15:13:19] VERBOSE[

Re: [asterisk-users] sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?

2015-02-20 Thread Andres
On 2/20/15 3:20 PM, thufir wrote: On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:07:35 -0500, Andres wrote: This is showing nothing so I don't think your test message even made it here. I think it looped in the 'doge' server. I was wondering the same thing :) in tleilax, I looked in /var/log/asterisk/messages and

Re: [asterisk-users] sipsak 200 for a user, but 404 for a different user...why?

2015-02-20 Thread thufir
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:11:53 -0500, Andres wrote: > I don't think so. But you should also see the SIP messages on the > console (sip set debug on) without having to look at the log file. Maybe > something in your logger.conf is messed up. that worked :) tleilax*CLI> tleilax*CLI> [Feb 20 21:0

Re: [asterisk-users] LAN sip-to-sip

2015-02-20 Thread thufir
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:12:04 -0500, John Novack wrote: > My switch is not managed, and the router ports on the LAN side are all > unmanaged, just a huge Ethernet "wirenut" > You SHOULD be able to communicate between devices on the LAN without any > firewall issue. I think I might be doing this

[asterisk-users] connecting with Ekiga; diagnostic tools

2015-02-20 Thread thufir
I think I'm able to connect with Ekiga, at least it reports "registered". Curiously, when I exit Ekiga and switch to SFLphone, it isn't able to connect with the exact same parameters; it just says "trying" and never resolves. I'm not able to test outside connectivity because of too many hops: