Re: [asterisk-users] having trouble to register cisco 7975 with pjsip

2015-02-24 Thread Joshua Colp
Nick Awesome wrote: Hay guys, got trouble with registration with cisco 7975 The "force_rport" option is incompatible with Cisco, it needs to be explicitly set to no in the endpoint. Cheers, -- Joshua Colp Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806

Re: [asterisk-users] having trouble to register cisco 7975 with pjsip

2015-02-24 Thread Nick Awesome
Ok after I added tcp transport and disable force_rport phone get registered, but still have issues with calls, when I call from cisco from, it work except hangup. when I call to cisco phone asterisk return congested debug of call <--- Transmitting SIP request (952 bytes) to TCP:192.168.1.61:51

Re: [asterisk-users] having trouble to register cisco 7975 with pjsip

2015-02-24 Thread Joshua Colp
Nick Awesome wrote: Ok after I added tcp transport and disable force_rport phone get registered, but still have issues with calls, when I call from cisco from, it work except hangup. when I call to cisco phone asterisk return congested If you use UDP with force_rport=no it'll work. If you use

Re: [asterisk-users] having trouble to register cisco 7975 with pjsip

2015-02-24 Thread Nick Awesome
Oh god it works ! to switch cisco to upd I used config: 2 with udp it works well, thanks for your help :) > On 24 Feb 2015, at 17:02, Joshua Colp wrote: > > If you use UDP with force_rport=no it'll work. > If you use TCP then set rewrite_contact=yes so it'll reuse the established > TCP connec

Re: [asterisk-users] Dynamic Music on Hold

2015-02-24 Thread Yaron Nachum
Thanks Carlos, I have created the table and changed the extconfig to : musiconhold => mysql,asterisk,musiconhold It works fine. Yaron On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Carlos Chavez wrote: > On 2/23/15 3:03 AM, Yaron Nachum wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> I am trying to activate Music On Hold us

Re: [asterisk-users] [OT] switches

2015-02-24 Thread Thufir
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:05:56 -0700, Harry McGregor wrote: > For a very basic setup it would work, but I would suggest POE at a > minimum, and vlan support if possible. > > Gigabit uplinks, 10/100 for the poe ports > > http://www.amazon.com/NETGEAR-ProSAFE-M4100-D10-POE-Ethernet-Managed/dp/ B00AU

Re: [asterisk-users] [OT] switches

2015-02-24 Thread Harry McGregor
On 02/24/2015 09:30 PM, Thufir wrote: On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:05:56 -0700, Harry McGregor wrote: For a very basic setup it would work, but I would suggest POE at a minimum, and vlan support if possible. Gigabit uplinks, 10/100 for the poe ports http://www.amazon.com/NETGEAR-ProSAFE-M4100-D10-