Before walking down this path, take a moment to think critically: How far
away is the AoR from the attendant station? Does there need to be local
rescue/fire service access to the communications? How reliable does the
link need to be? Will power always be available when the AoR pone is
required
I to Originate channels using AMI. When the other end indicates the channel is
ringing, I need to do some system notification work.
Everything works great when the ITSP sends a 180 Ringing response. Through AMI
events I see the channel state changed and can do the necessary work.
However, whe
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 04:21:07PM -0400, Eric Wieling wrote:
> If cable can be pulled , you have a couple of options.
>
> Long Reach Ethernet from Cisco is rated for 5,000 feet. Multi-mode fiber
> with fiber/ethernet media converters on each end would work and electrically
> isolate the two
If cable can be pulled , you have a couple of options.
Long Reach Ethernet from Cisco is rated for 5,000 feet. Multi-mode fiber
with fiber/ethernet media converters on each end would work and
electrically isolate the two ends of the cable. Both are way overkill
from a capacity standpoint, but
Forget RS485 at that distance (your throughput will be too low). I would
suggest you pull a fiber and just create an LAN connection on the end.
I’m sure you would have had fun getting some of the old IP over Serial drivers
working J
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016, Jerry Geis wrote:
"AOR" or Area of refuge
I have one of those. I call it my 'man cave.'
--
Thanks in advance,
-
Steve Edwards sedwa...@sedwards.com Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST
htt
Unless there is already RS485 in place, forcing the use of that type of bus,
this sounds to me like something that would be more easily achieved using one
of those 2-wire SIP doorphones that puts standard analog audio over a copper
pair between the handset and the base.
I don't have any specif
Hi All,
The reason for the question was simply that the customer desired some
solution
called an "AOR" or Area of refuge - I think it was. Basically a call
button, microphone and speaker to hear back
with the kicker being "a long distance" the solution has to run. RS485 is
like 4000 feet.
There
It caught my interest for the same reason! It's such an obscure query.
My guess was that the desire was to run it over an existing shared RS485 bus,
which means the maximum data rate available would be even less because it would
be shared with other devices.
The only way I could imagine a solu
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Jonathan H wrote:
> All I need is PJSIP, ulaw, alaw, wav, astdb and all the dialplan functions.
>
> I don't need any other DB layer, I have no hardware, and I was wondering
> what the smallest build possible was.
>
> I experimented, but everything relied on other th
This one caught my interest too...more out of curiosity! Keep in mind that
RS485 max speed drops to 100kbps after a relatively short distance. And,
100kbps is RAW speed. If you encapsulated your audio stream in that you'd
lose another 10%.
So why are you doing this? If you are running a 100m c
Why RS485? Whats wrong with a simple 3-wire connection (monospeaker, monomic,
ground) where you short monomic to ground on button press?
Then you could use a simple usb device + device server to convert fron
"smartphone headset" to usb then to network.
On the server, you use a SIP phone client,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is there any devices or pair of devices that do audio over RS485
> and then convert to SIP for us in asterisk?
> Of course a speaker and push button at the other end.
>
> Is there anything like that out there?
Ok, I'll bite. How do
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 11:00:10PM +, Jonathan H wrote:
> All I need is PJSIP, ulaw, alaw, wav, astdb and all the dialplan functions.
>
> I don't need any other DB layer, I have no hardware, and I was wondering
> what the smallest build possible was.
>
> I experimented, but everything relied
Hello
any one have some input on this ?
I've already tried changing the membername to : testacc77000/@1
Is completely ignored.
I've already tried changing the interface to : testacc77000/@1
Is completely ignored.
Or is it just not possible to group queue members ??
Thanks.
J.
On 27-10-
15 matches
Mail list logo