Hi. Our rules:
Le 08/09/2021 à 22:43, Marek Greško a écrit :
Hello,
I did converted from iptables by automatical script and then rewritten
myself, because not everything was rewritten successfully.
Relevant parts:
table ip filter {
ct helper sip {
type "sip" protocol udp
l3proto
> On 9/09/2021, at 8:46 AM, Marek Greško wrote:
>
> Sorry did convert, not did converted :)
>
> 2021-09-08 22:43 GMT+02:00, Marek Greško :
>> Hello,
>>
>> I did converted from iptables by automatical script and then rewritten
>> myself, because not everything was rewritten successfully.
>>
Sorry did convert, not did converted :)
2021-09-08 22:43 GMT+02:00, Marek Greško :
> Hello,
>
> I did converted from iptables by automatical script and then rewritten
> myself, because not everything was rewritten successfully.
>
> Relevant parts:
>
> table ip filter {
> ct helper sip {
>
Hello,
I did converted from iptables by automatical script and then rewritten
myself, because not everything was rewritten successfully.
Relevant parts:
table ip filter {
ct helper sip {
type "sip" protocol udp
l3proto ip
}
chain PREROUTING {
type filter hook prerouting
> On 9/09/2021, at 6:23 AM, Marek Greško wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I confirm temporarily allowing all the udp communication from the nat
> ip address solved the problem, so the problem lies in the nftables.
> This is probably not the right forum to continue. Or is it? Does
> anybody have wide
Hello,
I confirm temporarily allowing all the udp communication from the nat
ip address solved the problem, so the problem lies in the nftables.
This is probably not the right forum to continue. Or is it? Does
anybody have wide experience with nftables and sip?
Thanks
Marek
2021-09-07 10:40
Hi all
I'm experiencing issues while trying to restrict ExtenSpy to a single user's
channels.
I'm trying this:
same => n,ExtenSpy(${EXTEN:3},bde(${EXTEN:3}))
and this too
same => n,ExtenSpy(${EXTEN:3},bde(SIP/${EXTEN:3}))
Being EXTEN:3 == "ext20012104" in this scenario
And in the logs
