Re: [asterisk-users] Logging different verbosity levels

2022-05-23 Thread Kevin Harwell
So this turned out more complicated than I originally thought! My expectation: Verbosity gets logged using an "at least" check against the current system's verbose level, which if passed subsequently gets checked against the logging channel's verbose level. Thus only verbose messages with a level

Re: [asterisk-users] [External] [External] Geolocation/E911

2022-05-23 Thread Dan Cropp
Thank you Joshua. From: asterisk-users On Behalf Of Joshua C. Colp Sent: Monday, May 23, 2022 3:58 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [External] [asterisk-users] [External] Geolocation/E911 On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 5:52 PM Dan Cropp mailto:d...@amtelc

Re: [asterisk-users] [External] Geolocation/E911

2022-05-23 Thread Dan Cropp
Thank you Joshua. I will read both links you provided. As mentioned in another response. If what our customer requires doesn’t fit well with Asterisk development, we believe we can do this work with Kamailio front ending the calls. Something customer is already requiring us to do for high av

Re: [asterisk-users] [External] Geolocation/E911

2022-05-23 Thread Joshua C. Colp
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 5:52 PM Dan Cropp wrote: > We have a customer who wants to perform both directions. > > > > For inbound calls, they have indicated their switch will provide > Geolocation/E911 information using two different ways. Sounds like it > depends on the equipment before the SIP p

Re: [asterisk-users] [External] Geolocation/E911

2022-05-23 Thread Dan Cropp
We have a customer who wants to perform both directions. For inbound calls, they have indicated their switch will provide Geolocation/E911 information using two different ways. Sounds like it depends on the equipment before the SIP proxy. It will either be in SIP headers (which we retrieve thro

Re: [asterisk-users] Geolocation/E911

2022-05-23 Thread Joshua C. Colp
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 5:18 PM Sebastian Nielsen wrote: > What are you talking about exactly? > > > > What I have understand, E911 geo information is sent “out of band” when > 911 is called. > > > > So the question is, is you operating a 911 call centre – then you should > have this information

Re: [asterisk-users] Geolocation/E911

2022-05-23 Thread Joshua C. Colp
Whoops, review is at https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/18360 On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 5:21 PM Joshua C. Colp wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 4:59 PM Dan Cropp wrote: > >> Out of curiosity, is there any documentation on what is planned for the >> Geolocation/E911? >> > > There is a review

Re: [asterisk-users] Geolocation/E911

2022-05-23 Thread Joshua C. Colp
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 4:59 PM Dan Cropp wrote: > Out of curiosity, is there any documentation on what is planned for the > Geolocation/E911? > There is a review up on Gerrit[1] with the documentation in markdown. There's also a branch in Gerrit with the work. We are planning to do interop test

[asterisk-users] Geolocation/E911

2022-05-23 Thread Dan Cropp
Out of curiosity, is there any documentation on what is planned for the Geolocation/E911? Is the plan for Asterisk to expose the SIP body and leave it to dial plan, ARI, AMI to process the data? For example, mime pidf+xml section? Or is there a different approach being worked on (or planned to

Re: [asterisk-users] Logging different verbosity levels

2022-05-23 Thread Antony Stone
Hi. Does no-one else know either? I thought this was a simple question, and it was just me being unable to find the appropriate documentation to explain how these logging levels work. Please, can anyone help? On Friday 20 May 2022 at 15:33:45, Antony Stone wrote: > Hi. > > I'm trying to use