Re: [asterisk-users] Question about SIP registration

2010-01-13 Thread Aggio Alberto
Of Robert Lister Sent: martedì 12 gennaio 2010 18.51 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Question about SIP registration On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 18:16 +0100, Aggio Alberto wrote: Then I have configured an account as following: [999] type

[asterisk-users] Question about SIP registration

2010-01-12 Thread Aggio Alberto
Hi guys, I recently faced an issue regarding SIP registration: I have a 2-NIC Linux PC, with eth0 set to address 192.168.1.1 (NATted over public network, with address 89.X.Y.Z) and eth1 set to address 1.1.1.1. In [sip.conf] I set general option bindaddr=0.0.0.0; IP address to

Re: [asterisk-users] No reply to SIP OPTIONS - sip peers becoming randomly UNREACHABLE

2010-01-07 Thread Aggio Alberto
Hi, I have occasionally experienced the same problem too, and I suspect it was caused by some spikes in network traffic (e.g. for an intensive file transfer) that delayed too much SIP OPTION response, so that Asterisk marked these devices as UNREACHABLE; I was able to use the devices too: in

Re: [asterisk-users] Connect two Asterisk Server in IAX ?

2009-11-23 Thread Aggio Alberto
Hi, maybe this link can be useful: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/IAX+encryption In particular, in your configuration I can't see the authentication method, which must be md5, and a username to authenticate with, in either server. But have a further look at the article, maybe you'll be able

Re: [asterisk-users] destroy zombie session

2009-11-17 Thread Aggio Alberto
-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] destroy zombie session What does the zombie call look like in core show channels? From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Aggio Alberto Sent

Re: [asterisk-users] RTP traffic through Asterisk??

2009-11-17 Thread Aggio Alberto
As far as I could try some solutions, the only one that works as you like involved use of Transfer() application, defining as 'tecnology' something like that: SIP/exten@ip_address Where ip_address is the address of the peer you want to transfer the call to. By the way, I found a scenario where

[asterisk-users] destroy zombie session

2009-11-13 Thread Aggio Alberto
Hi all, Some time ago I posted an issue regarding the hangup of active calls from the CLI and someone told me that soft hangup should work. Well, in fact it does work, but only if the channel is known, i.e. it doesn't work for zombie channels. For example, I have this scenario (CLI output of

Re: [asterisk-users] pattern matching DID

2009-11-01 Thread Aggio Alberto
Hi, it's quite straightforward: you can do your dialplan like this (default is the default context answered when inbound calls happen) - remember the underscores! - [default] exten = _1703,1,Goto(place-IVR,s,1) exten = _1567 ,1,Goto(place-other,s,1) [place-IVR] exten =

[asterisk-users] Clear pending SIP channels

2009-10-28 Thread Aggio Alberto
Hi all, I have a question regarding pending (zombie) SIP sessions: on Asterisk CLI, with command 'sip show channels' , I see two channels in use with callID and other infos detailed; also 'sip show inuse' give me same result (in terms of channels usage): PeerUser/ANRCall ID