Isn't this channel specific? Why is this being added? It does not work
with SIP. It does not appear to be architecturally generic.
This gets added, but yet a channel specific enhancement for SIP that would
be beneficial for endusers does not get added. Again, Asterisk is good at
transferring
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Watkins, Bradley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being able to pass variables around between systems is by *definition*
channel-specific, since the channel driver is the module responsible for
speaking a given protocol. Besdies, SIP already has (and has had for
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Philipp Kempgen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5014
The response on that issue from Russell is the kind of response that
really ticks me off. No, no, no, we don't want any real features that users
want, we want basic, boring
Wow! That is a good question. I can't believe no one has ever asked that
before.
Seriously, before letting someone join this mailing list, it should ask them
a simple question:
When you don't know the answer to something, do you:
a) blindly ask hundreds of people with no regard to whether it
On Jan 2, 2008 12:23 AM, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
is there any howto how do i configure a asterisk/trixbox for mail2fax?
The fax must be send over sipgate or other SIP peers. (i dont have
any normal telephones connected).
Do people even read the mail list anymore, or do
On Dec 2, 2007 3:42 PM, Carlos Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking the softswitch in digium website, anyone test the softswitch?
Nope. No one has tested it or used it. Try the one at cisco.com.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
On 6/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just upgraded my 7970G to the SIP firmware. What I'd like to do is have
the 8 line buttons be able to make outbound calls using the same account
(for practical purposes, same caller-ID). Since the phone is going to have a
single public
Why? Because of their excellent customer support in taking care of a
problem? At the price of the Grandstreams compared to others, I can deal
with a couple of bad apples. I can buy two Grandstream's for the price of a
phone with similar features. I can deal with a lot of bad apples at that
On 4/2/07, Corporate IT Solutions - Michael Dunne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So subjectively what would be the best Hardphone for a small/medium
business with multiple line support, BLF, etc.
Does _anyone_ read the archives anymore? This is like a weekly question or
something.
On 3/21/07, Chris Nighswonger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just successfully configured a Cisco 30VIP to work with my
Asterisk server. I have seven of these phones new and would like to
deploy them. I am wondering if anyone has this phone deployed with
Asterisk and can suggest configuration
On 3/21/07, Richard Klingler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As chan_sccp is pretty much dead, doesn't compile on FBSD anyway
and isn't supported on * 1.4.x I tried going with chan_skinny...
chan_sccp is far from dead and it works with 1.4. more fud being spread...
On 3/21/07, Jeremiah Millay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
chan_zap won't compile in asterisk 1.4.2 when used with zaptel 1.4.0.
The changelog has this entry:
And you missed all the other discussions about it not working? Or, are you
just special and wanted your own thread?
On 3/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
P.S The program that I am using is open source, of course
(www.phpsurveyor.org)!
What part of the survey is running Asterisk?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
On 3/22/07, Diarmaid O'Loughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will be out of the office starting 22-03-2007 and will not return until
16-04-2007.
Congratulations!
I will be on holidays until the 16th of April. I will have no access to
e-mail during this time. If this is a matter relating to
On 3/15/07, OCOSA List Acct. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
and if you all depend on James' site so much then you need to donate
some time or contact him about getting a mirror. The so called new site
Google didn't go down, and if you had bothered searching the archives of
this list you
On 1/9/07, Al Bochter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So do you think Digum and Sipro is now one in the same code with G729 in
mind?
If saying this will make this go away, then yes. They both use the same
code. The patented code is the same.
___
On 1/8/07, Al Bochter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
So tell me what this FREE open source G729 is
I am told that you can use these Codecs with your Asterisk !
http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/ipp-codecs-g729-g723.1/
You can do it Freely !!
Al, I don't know if you're stupid, or you
On 1/8/07, Al Bochter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. I only know what I have told by others so I do need this input
I have been told that Digum G729 is a big pain the the butt to get
working with Asterisk
and it is very hard on the CPU
Keep in mind I have never used any Ver. of G 729
I
On 12/31/06, Adam Jacob Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's still 2006 here
-Adam
Well, Adam, I guess it is all about you. What does the rest of the world
look like as it revolves around you?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
On 12/24/06, Al Bochter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you would deal with a criminal ?
Bret McDanel was *Convicted Of Cybercrimes*
And did you finish reading wherever you got that information? No, because
it didn't suit your allegations.
Try finishing it: Prosecution voluntarily moved to
Geez Al, let it go. We've heard your rants for what seems like years now
(even though it's only been weeks). No one cares anymore.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options
21 matches
Mail list logo
