Re: [asterisk-users] Fwd: Patton smartnode 463x (BRI) 25ms tail echo cancellation

2009-09-11 Thread Gaëtan Minet
gain is a good practice too. Best Regards Jorge Mendoza Gaëtan Minet wrote: Thanks ! We installed it in the interim and have a lot of calls with far-end echo :(. But it seems the solution could be to reduce the TX gain on our side (these are using polycom phones, and indeed I can see

Re: [asterisk-users] Fwd: Patton smartnode 463x (BRI) 25ms tail echo cancellation

2009-09-09 Thread Gaëtan Minet
. Jorge Mendoza Gaëtan Minet wrote: Hi Is anybody using these ? Gaetan Begin forwarded message: *From: *Gaëtan Minet gminet...@mcit.be mailto:gminet...@mcit.be *Date: *Sat 22 Aug 2009 16:29:42 GMT+02:00 *To: *Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fwd: Patton smartnode 463x (BRI) 25ms tail echo cancellation

2009-09-09 Thread Gaëtan Minet
so far. Jorge Mendoza Gaëtan Minet wrote: Hi Is anybody using these ? Gaetan Begin forwarded message: *From: *Gaëtan Minet gminet...@mcit.be mailto:gminet- m...@mcit.be *Date: *Sat 22 Aug 2009 16:29:42 GMT+02:00 *To: *Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion

[asterisk-users] Fwd: Patton smartnode 463x (BRI) 25ms tail echo cancellation

2009-09-08 Thread Gaëtan Minet
Hi Is anybody using these ? Gaetan Begin forwarded message: From: Gaëtan Minet gminet...@mcit.be Date: Sat 22 Aug 2009 16:29:42 GMT+02:00 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Patton smartnode 463x (BRI) 25ms

[asterisk-users] Patton smartnode 463x (BRI) 25ms tail echo cancellation

2009-08-22 Thread Gaëtan Minet
Hi all We use pci/pci-e BRI cards in our installations. Due to echo problems (that was before Oslec and others), we quickly switched to cards with hardware-based EC. So we use exclusively Digium B410p cards that provide 64ms tail EC. For several reasons we'd like to switch to external BRI

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: reverse DNS error for lists.digium.com

2008-01-14 Thread Gaëtan Minet
Hello Same problem here. That could explain why I'm asked for a subscription confirmation every day due to excessive bounces only for this list. Gaetan ;; Got SERVFAIL reply from 195.238.2.21, trying next server ;; Got SERVFAIL reply from 195.238.2.21, trying next server Server:

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: reverse DNS error for lists.digium.com

2008-01-14 Thread Gaëtan Minet
Hi The authoritative apid.com nameservers still don't reply correctly so I don't think something better will propagate soon. (and there is no ns record for the 3-63.245.207.216.in-addr.arpa subzone in which 17.245.207.216.in-addr.arpa is cname'd) Gaetan On 14/01/2008, at 19:34, Kevin

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote hold on PRI

2008-01-07 Thread Gaëtan Minet
Hi Nobody has an Idea ? Should I try and fill a bug report (or feature request ?) at Digium ? The only solution I personally see is a patch in the source. Regards Gaetan On 04/01/2008, at 23:26, Gaëtan Minet wrote: Hi everybody We have a strange problem with several asterisk servers

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote hold on PRI

2008-01-07 Thread Gaëtan Minet
you Regards, Gaetan On 07/01/2008, at 21:28, Shane Spencer wrote: So, watching the asterisk console with full debug on shows something about Starting Music On Hold for Channel xx/yy-zz? Shane On Jan 7, 2008 11:00 AM, Gaëtan Minet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Nobody has an Idea ? Should I

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4.17 - Breaks park announce?

2008-01-05 Thread Gaëtan Minet
Hello I noticed this in 1.4.11 at least. the saydigit function (used internally by Park(), voicemail(), ) was broken at least in 1.4.11+ and searched files in the wrong directory (but then tries to paly them from the right one). No idea if this is fixed in 1.4.17. Can you hear

[asterisk-users] Remote hold on PRI

2008-01-04 Thread Gaëtan Minet
Hi everybody We have a strange problem with several asterisk servers (Version 1.4.11) using PRI cards (tied to telco here in Belgium). Indeed we noticed that whenever a local user places an outgoing call through the PRI (and telco) to another IPBX (tied to telco using BRI or PRI), if the