[asterisk-users] ISDN BRITE support?

2007-04-10 Thread Jeff Gustafson
Hi all, I found some message in the Digium list archives that discussed ISDN BRITE support. There was also some discussion on 4:1 bitrate conversion. I did some searching on the source code and didn't see any reference to BRITE or bitrate conversion. Does the current code

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium cards, so disappointing !

2006-04-14 Thread Jeff Gustafson
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 08:19 -0500, Rich Adamson wrote: I believe the TDM2400 has the capability of doing on-card fxo-fxs data flows (without hitting the pci bus), but that function has not yet been implemented. Its basically required to support faxes in an analog environment. When it is

Faxing and PCI (was Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium cards, so disappointing !)

2006-04-14 Thread Jeff Gustafson
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 13:49 -0300, Joshua Colp wrote: Some people have problems, some people don't. There is no way you can be prepared for every situation out there. We try our best. I was looking at using a Dell server for running Asterisk and noticed that Dell has started using

Re: Faxing and PCI (was Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium cards, so disappointing !)

2006-04-14 Thread Jeff Gustafson
on their server class machines. ...Jeff Aaron On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Jeff Gustafson wrote: On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 13:49 -0300, Joshua Colp wrote: Some people have problems, some people don't. There is no way you can be prepared for every situation out

Re: Faxing and PCI (was Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium cards, so disappointing !)

2006-04-14 Thread Jeff Gustafson
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 15:10 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Jeff Gustafson wrote: I was looking at using a Dell server for running Asterisk and noticed that Dell has started using PCI-X on a lot of their new systems. Does this newer bus standard help the situation with faxing

Re: Faxing and PCI (was Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium cards, so disappointing !)

2006-04-14 Thread Jeff Gustafson
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 15:35 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Jeff Gustafson wrote: My fault. I meant to say PCI-e, which is a newer bus that Dell is shipping on their server class machines. Right. That is not supported by any Digium products yet, but it still won't help the FAXing

RE: [Asterisk-Users] 100 analog phones?? HOWTO?

2004-05-25 Thread Jeff Gustafson
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 19:33, Paul Mahler wrote: I have had good experiences with Adit. Their customer service and documentation are excellent. Sounds good. So they have chassis that can handle = 100 analog phones? I looked at something called the Adit 600. But I wasn't sure I could

RE: [Asterisk-Users] 100 analog phones?? HOWTO?

2004-05-25 Thread Jeff Gustafson
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 14:06, Steven Critchfield wrote: Most devices you will be using will be in some multiple of 24 as that is the number of channels in a T1. An Adit 600 will allow you up to 48 channels as it is capable of handling 2 T1s on the back and 6 x 8port cards. So your 100 phones is

RE: [Asterisk-Users] dreaded Caller*ID failed checksum

2004-04-09 Thread Jeff Gustafson
: 2000.103 cache size : 256 KB Also, is yours the true Digium card or is yours a One real, 3 clones. Customers get real cards, my poor testing lab gets clones. ...Jeff Thanks! Jeremy -Original Message- From: Jeff Gustafson

[Asterisk-Users] dreaded Caller*ID failed checksum

2004-04-08 Thread Jeff Gustafson
Caller*ID used to work as some point, but I can't seem to get it going these days. The card is a x101p. I've tried going up and down the rxgain scale. Can the txgain effect it at all? When I plug in a phone into the line with a splitter it can decode caller id with no problems.

RE: [Asterisk-Users] dreaded Caller*ID failed checksum

2004-04-08 Thread Jeff Gustafson
. If that turns out to be the case, I may be forced to go ahead and get an actual Digium card sooner than I anticipated in order to prove the theory. Regards, Jeremy -Original Message- From: Jeff Gustafson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 12:06 AM To: [EMAIL

[Asterisk-Users] Adtran 850 questions

2004-04-07 Thread Jeff Gustafson
I just wanted to ask about using Adtran boxes to support analog lines into an Asterisk box. Right now x101p's are just too sensitive to RF noise inside the PC. Going with an external chassis looks like a good, albeit expensive option. It looks like I can use the Digium T1 card into an

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Buzzing on TDM400P FXS?

2004-04-05 Thread Jeff Gustafson
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 17:29, Jonathan Biggs wrote: Had a similar problem What kind of phone are you using on that line? My case, the line was sharing a Palm modem on it. Electrical noise from the power strip was causing the problem. I'm having a similar problem. The difference

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicetronix Openswitch 12

2004-03-17 Thread Jeff Gustafson
Voicetronix is actively working to improve the vpb driver in Asterisk. Right now the code they sent me is for the Asterisk CVS code. Right now the Asterisk CVS code seems to be totally hosed for incoming audio over an analog line even with a x101p. I'm hoping that things will clean up

[Asterisk-Users] voicetronix openswitch -- bad echo

2004-03-09 Thread Jeff Gustafson
Hi all, I'm having a terrible time with a voicetronix Openswitch/8 board. I don't mind having to patch up the driver a bit, but I don't understand why there is such a *drastic* echo. For example, if I call my cell phone from a Cisco SIP phone, I heard my self on the cell phone and on the

[Asterisk-Users] adtran?

2004-03-09 Thread Jeff Gustafson
I'm trying to setup an 8 line PBX with asterisk. I'm not having good luck with the Voicetronix Openswitch board. I was wondering if I went with a channel bank like an Adtran 750 if I would have echo problems. This is the main problem that my boss complains about. I've tested the x101p,

[Asterisk-Users] 3 second echo

2004-03-09 Thread Jeff Gustafson
Sorry to put out 3 messages in one day with similar questions, but this echo stuff is driving me crazy. The Openswitch card gave me a 3 second echo today. That's really long! It seems it's only that bad when I dial into Asterisk to an extension versus dialing out. I've adjusted gain

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco LDAP directory

2004-03-02 Thread Jeff Gustafson
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 22:09, Andreas Anderson wrote: Hi, does anyone has an LDAP based directory for the Cisco 7900 Series? I found some directorys based on sql, but an ldap directory would allow syncronisation with evolution, mozilla, multisync (Palm, OPIE, Mobile phones etc...) Greez

[Asterisk-Users] ztmonitor and the x101p

2004-02-23 Thread Jeff Gustafson
I have a x101p and I can't seem to get ztmonitor to work on it. I've tried it on 2 different machines. One with a SBLive! card and the other with a AMD-768 [Opus] Audio (rev 03) chip. Neither machine give me a graph in ztmonitor 1 -v mode. If I run ztmonitor without the -v I get:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] ztmonitor and the x101p

2004-02-23 Thread Jeff Gustafson
Ah! I just checked out the latest ztmonitor out of cvs and it works just fine. ...Jeff On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 12:51, Jeff Gustafson wrote: I have a x101p and I can't seem to get ztmonitor to work on it. I've tried it on 2 different machines. One

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Solved! x101p beeps/sceeching

2004-02-13 Thread Jeff Gustafson
It turned out that a Gb/E card was too close to the modem causing activity on the card to bleed over to the modem. ...Jeff On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 16:11, Jeff Gustafson wrote: I'm experiencing periodic beeps or screeching when I'm on a call via

[Asterisk-Users] x101p beeps/sceeching

2004-02-12 Thread Jeff Gustafson
I'm experiencing periodic beeps or screeching when I'm on a call via the x101p card to/from PSTN. Echo cancellation seems to be working fine. The beeps seem to happen with echo cancellation on or off. Is there a setting I can tweak for this? The problem does not occur if I'm

[Asterisk-Users] progress on DTMF

2004-02-04 Thread Jeff Gustafson
I tried out today's release of Asterisk. I am now able to consistently decode inband DTMF over SIP. The problem is that Asterisk only decodes the first code. So extensions consisting over more than one digit do not work. So, for example, in the demo extensions, extension 2 and 3 work

Re: [Asterisk-Users] progress on DTMF

2004-02-04 Thread Jeff Gustafson
=alaw Still, only the first digit is decoded. Anything past the first code are not decoded. ...Jeff On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 17:38, Jeff Gustafson wrote: I tried out today's release of Asterisk. I am now able to consistently decode inband DTMF over SIP

Re: AW: [Asterisk-Users] I got it (was: Cisco 7940 with asterisk)

2004-01-23 Thread Jeff Gustafson
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 00:33, Martin Bene wrote: Hi Siggi/Jan, The Error Verifying Config Info Message doesn't have anything to do with the real problem. I also get that message, possibly because I don't keep a device specific config file (SEP000D65707B78.cnf.xml) or DISTINCTIVERINGLIST.XML on

[Asterisk-Users] voiceglo.com and dtmf

2004-01-22 Thread Jeff Gustafson
Hello all, I've been trying to get a simple PBX up and running with asterisk. I decided to sign up with Voiceglo so I could have a PSTN gateway. The problem is that I can't seem to get Asterisk to handle dtmf decoding reliably. I tried inband and the rfc decoding. inband tried to work

Re: [Asterisk-Users] I got it (was: Cisco 7940 with asterisk)

2004-01-21 Thread Jeff Gustafson
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 06:04, Jan Czmok wrote: Jeff Gustafson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi again, I found chan_skinny and that seems to work pretty good. the SCCP one filled out all the buttons really nice, but skinny seems to be working. How do I fill out the second line

Re: [Asterisk-Users] I got it (was: Cisco 7940 with asterisk)

2004-01-21 Thread Jeff Gustafson
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 06:04, Jan Czmok wrote: Define a second section, however, you also might want to take a peek at chan_sccp. We are currently reworking the complete chan_sccp to support all functions known by the Skinny Protocol. Yes, EVEN the 7920 is working with it now :-)

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7940 with asterisk

2004-01-21 Thread Jeff Gustafson
://10.0.0.112:8086/ciscodirectory?accent=true/directo ryURL idleURL/idleURL informationURL/informationURL messagesURL/messagesURL proxyServerURL/proxyServerURL servicesURL/servicesURL /device -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff

Re: [Asterisk-Users] I got it (was: Cisco 7940 with asterisk)

2004-01-21 Thread Jeff Gustafson
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 13:17, Jan Czmok wrote: Jeff Gustafson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 06:04, Jan Czmok wrote: Define a second section, however, you also might want to take a peek at chan_sccp. We are currently reworking the complete chan_sccp to support all

Re: [Asterisk-Users] I got it (was: Cisco 7940 with asterisk)

2004-01-21 Thread Jeff Gustafson
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 14:05, Jan Czmok wrote: Kewl, I was apparently trying to use older chan_sccp code which didn't work. Okay... just tried your new code. The phones keep resetting: Error Verifying Config Info then Registering you should use the CURRENT code,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] I got it (was: Cisco 7940 with asterisk)

2004-01-21 Thread Jeff Gustafson
Maybe it's not the new chan_sccp code that's the problem. When I put in the SEP000785532D5F.cnf.xml on the tftp server, the phone never gets to a usable screen. Instead it just tries to tftp files over and over. Th one file, P00305000300.bin, I don't have. As far as I know I can't get

[Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7940 with asterisk

2004-01-20 Thread Jeff Gustafson
Hi all, I've been playing around with a cisco 7940 phone. It seems to like talking to Asterisk with the chan_sccp plugin. The only problem is that it tries to call out to a SEPX.cnf.xml file to verify it's configuration. I've found docs for SEP*.cnf files, but not .xml ones.

[Asterisk-Users] I got it (was: Cisco 7940 with asterisk)

2004-01-20 Thread Jeff Gustafson
Hi again, I found chan_skinny and that seems to work pretty good. the SCCP one filled out all the buttons really nice, but skinny seems to be working. How do I fill out the second line button on the phone with skinny.conf? Thanks much! ...Jeff