Thank you - while not directly an answer to my question, it directly
addresses the root of my question, pointing me where I'll need to go to
dig deeper. It also tells me what we didn't want to hear, that there's
a very good possibility that we simply won't be able to ensure that the
911 call cente
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 09:16 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:20:12AM -0400, Joel Newkirk wrote:
> > How can we achieve this, short of 'reciting' the unit number aloud at
> > the beginning of the placed call?
>
> Hmm, could you just put the
OK, got a question on 911.
Looking into setting up a couple asterisk servers at a country club,
with VOIP phones in each of 100 short-term residential rental units.
Approx 100 extensions, approx 24 outside lines.
Since everything is geographically at one location, reaching 911
correctly shouldn't
Gavin Hamill wrote:
Hi :)
When I send an incoming call to a queue, I'm doing this:
exten => 6608140,1,SetCallerID(CCUK)
exten => 6608140,2,SetCIDName(CCUK)
exten => 6608140,3,Queue(ccuk,r)
I want the phone to say 'CCUK' - the queue name is more important to know than
the incoming Caller ID :)
Unf
Gareth Blades wrote:
Reading http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-SPA-841 I have configured Asterisk
with the following dialplan to ring using 'Simple-1' but it is not
working.
exten => 6150,1,SetVar(ALERT_INFO=Simple-1)
exten => 6150,2,Dial(SIP/6152,4,t)
In the 'distinctive ring' section on that page is
Michael Sanders wrote:
Hi,
Ive got a linux firewall with Private/Public ip address on two nics.I
need clients to connect via SIP from the private network to a public
Asterisk PBX.Ive tried the the configs from the wiki and have not come
right.
Has anyone managed to get this working and if s
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
I would like to define some numbers which would be available at each
phone as short cut. However, it would be nice to use that on a group of
phone numbers instead of really everyone.
What are you using?
bye
Ronald
Just push different SIP clients into different contexts wh
Jesse Guardiani wrote:
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 01:39:09 -0400, Karl J. Vesterling wrote:
H.323 will not traverse NAT.
Sorry... I know, I was a big proponent of it when H.323 was the only
"standard" VoIP protocol out there. Probably because when it came out NAT
wasn't even thought of.
The proble
