On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 06:50:54PM -0300, Doug Meredith wrote:
> Dinesh Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >too much divergence and we have two pieces of software competing for each
> >other.
>
> My guess is that if they succeed, they will diverge significantly.
We will have two pieces of soft
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 01:51:41PM -0400, Paul wrote:
> Mike M wrote:
> >
> Mike, the context was regarding security by obscurity. It has nothing to
> do with stealing a product to sell to others. The only reverse
> engineering I ever did had nothing at all to do w
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 10:43:28PM -0400, Paul wrote:
> Steve Underwood wrote:
> >>
> >It's not harder. It's just different. A number of things have similar
> >requirements. The ISDN4Linux folk have certain versions of their
> >software approved by the telecoms bodies in Europe. They need to tie
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 09:20:07AM -0400, Paul wrote:
>
> I find that amusing. I have a lot of experience with disassembly. I have
> even reverse-engineered machine language code that ran on custom
> processors which means you have to reverse-engineer the instruction set
> as part of the task.
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:45:53PM -0400, Paul wrote:
> Doug Meredith wrote:
> Also consider that there are situations where 100% open source is never
> allowed. Check out visa/mastercard processor certification for a good
> example. Digium dual licensing availability means I could actually stand
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 10:51:45AM -0400, Brian C. Fertig wrote:
> Can they do this? Is this legal?
Google "fork open source".
--
Mike
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.di
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 02:45:47PM -0700, Michael D Schelin wrote:
> BUT,
> let me tell you about how bad the southern CA. radio site owners are
> becoming. We had a 4 day outage at a very large site where one of my
> radios is located. None of them care anymore about backup power. This
> happen
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:02:56AM -0700, Derek Whitten wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 08:44, Mike M wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 04:43:26PM -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
> > >
> > > Mark Phillips wrote:
> > >
> > > The suggestion that I have
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 04:43:26PM -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
>
> Mark Phillips wrote:
>
> The suggestion that I have is for various areas to have dedicated civil
> emergency com units with strategic reserves of fuel (3-4 weeks worth),
> battery backups, etc. These units would have links (fib
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:18:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Oops !
> Sorry ! It seems that I have forgotten to replace my french characters as
> "?" by the correct sequence "é" as exemple.
> I have just modify this page and you can probably read it now (but it is in
> french only for now,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 09:08:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Asterisk is "on the air" :
> http://www.hamwlan.net
> http://192.168.1.1/HamWlan.htm (see the second drawing)
>
> 73 !
> F6HQZ,
> Francois BERGERET,
> France.
Excellent.
So you have SIP/IAX clients connecting to a r
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:31:06AM -0400, Mark Phillips wrote:
>
> Generators require fuel which is always in short supply and batteries
> die out quickly.
Fuel and batteries and power efficient systems need planning and
management. Don't overlook solar panels as an energy source. They
need t
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 01:46:57PM +0100, Peter Bowyer wrote:
> On 09/09/05, Mike M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 07:28:34PM +, Mike Hemstock wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 15:27, Mike M wrote:
> > > >
> > > &g
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 07:28:34PM +, Mike Hemstock wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 September 2005 15:27, Mike M wrote:
> >
> > Imagine what a network of systems composed of Asterisk, ham radio, wifi,
> > generators, batteries, and a reserve of fuel could have done for the
> &
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:07:36AM -0700, Karl S. Katzke wrote:
> Just don't do what one of my friends did, and fed-ex his backup CDs to
> his mom in Biloxi ... who kept them in a box on a shelf out back in the
> shed.
>
> After the storm, they found precisely half of one... embedded in the
> s
The disaster in the Gulf coast and the less than optimal initial
response suggests to me that citizens must shoulder more responsibility
for emergency management. Communications loss must have played a large
role in the failures that occurred. I can't help but wonder if there
are fewer ham radio
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:04:41AM -0400, JR Richardson wrote:
> If anyone has any trade secrets on successfully recovering waterlogged
> electronic equipment, please let me know.
Glad that you're safe. We're still waiting to hear about some of our
people.
Notes of encouragement:
1) DMS-10s ha
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:24:02AM -0500, Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
> Nguyen Trung Tin wrote:
> >
> >I'm using sangoma card A-101. tested successful with E10 (ACATEL)
> >Exchange, connection with E1, CAS, (using unicall-0.0.3pre4).
> >
> >my system run success, incoming call and call out are good
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 12:15:06AM -0700, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com
wrote:
>
> In short you might investigate a phone company service blocker for
> premium service numbers and try your best to block what you can but it
> would be impossible for someone without SS7 network access to see wh
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a quickie - if I want to implement an * solution purely for voice (well,
> and physical fax machines / dialup modems..) on EuroISDN E1s, is there any
> benefit to the A104u over the A104c?
>
> I'm just trying to decid
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 07:31:30AM +1000, Rod Bacon wrote:
> Thankyou for an excellent post.
I hope it helps. I put up SS7 circuits and I'm starting to put up PRI
circuits so I recognized what you were describing. If you think of it,
post your progress or success.
--
Mike
__
Comments throughout.
--
Mike
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 08:23:55PM -0400, Carlos Alperin wrote:
> That has nothing to do with the fact that you 're going to check what is
> going on on that line.
>
> You're going to check BER (Bit Error Rate) to see if you have line problems.
FCS is indication o
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 06:22:57PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> Hi Alessandro,
>
> > But all ports are green!
> >
> > p1 -green
> >
> > p2 - green
> > p3 - green
> > p4 - green
>
> I think he means the daughter card color, not the LED on the card slot.
> What color are the actual daughter cards?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 02:58:54PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
>
> Mike M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Think "opposite". Green modules are fxs and should be handled with the
> > fxo signaling. Red modules are fxo and should be handled with fxs
> > signaling.
&g
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 05:19:47PM -0300, Alessandro wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I got current stable release in CVS repository, and I think that Ok.
> See below:
>
> /var/log/messages
> Jun 22 17:04:35 darthvaden kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device 02:09.0
> Jun 22 17:04:35 darthvaden kernel: PCI: S
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 01:03:33PM -0300, Alessandro wrote:
> Mike,
> It's got 4 modules. What color are the modules in positions 1, 2, 3, 4
>
> on the TDM400P card? Don't be confused by the 0-3 numbering, just add
> 1.
>
> The colors in positions 3 and 4 are green, 1 and 2 light is off.
Y
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:50:42AM -0500, Don Brearley wrote:
> I've been planning to replace my aging CENTREX switch with a new PBX and am
> seriously
> considering Asterisk as my solution.
You have a CENTREX switch? I'm confused.
Do you have a PBX?
Do you pay for Centrex services from your p
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:41:18AM -0300, Alessandro wrote:
>
> Does somebody know why no load modules to FXS? I used zaptel-1.0.7
> version driver.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.0.7]# modprobe wctdm
Here's a clue:
> ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 3: Invalid argument (22)
> Did you forge
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:09:52PM -0300, Alessandro wrote:
>
> Does Somebody know why no load modules to FXS? I used zaptel-1.0.7
> version.
What color are the modules?
Post your /etc/zaptel.conf
--
Mike
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-User
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 10:47:59AM -0300, Edgardo Lust wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a pentium 4 with Intel motherboard and one TDM400P (2 fxs, 2fxo)
>
> modprobe zaptel is Ok
> but
> When I execute modprobe wctdm never load the module, I can wait for 1
> year but never response me (error or OK). I need
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 07:09:46AM -0600, Rich Adamson wrote:
>
> > I am struggling to get my TDM04B working. Just to rule out a hardware
> > problem how can I check
> that the hardware works? How can I then
> > check that the drivers are loaded correctly?
> >
>
> 1. from the linux command
Hi,
What does an't locate module sound-service-0-3 mean in the context
below?
I don't use curl as far as I know. Should I "noload" it in
modules.conf?
[app_curl.so]Jun 19 08:41:25 b2 kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United
States / North America)
Jun 19 08:41:34 b2 kernel: Intel 810 + AC97 Au
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 03:06:52PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 08:19:58AM -0400, Mike M wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 02:03:59PM +0200, Michiel van Baak wrote:
> > > On 13:22, Sat 11 Jun 05, Serge Schumacher wrote:
> > > > What plat
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 06:10:53AM -0400, Michael Di Martino wrote:
>
> However i still get the same error. Please help we cannot connect call
> form my norstar to asterisk w/ it dropping in 10 seconds.
>
> Jun 12 10:51:51 NOTICE[213005]: PRI got event: 5 on Primary D-channel of
> span 2
> Jun 12
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 10:58:13AM -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> On Saturday 11 June 2005 10:36, Mike M wrote:
> > You're running from an upgraded Slink? That's the beauty of Debian.
>
> What distro *doesn't* let you do this? I've been doing it this
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 02:30:31PM +0200, Michiel van Baak wrote:
>
> I will have a look at it later this week since my
> workstation is now replaced by a laptop so I have some
> testing hardware :)
You're running from an upgraded Slink? That's the beauty of Debian.
You may need to use Sid if y
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 02:03:59PM +0200, Michiel van Baak wrote:
> On 13:22, Sat 11 Jun 05, Serge Schumacher wrote:
> > What platform should you suggest to use asterisk ?
>
> I love the way the Debian updates work.
Me too, but has the installation improved with the latest Sarge release?
The anno
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 06:11:06PM -0600, Michael Welter wrote:
> VOIP Consultant wrote:
> >
> >I have the exact same problem.It would ideal if we could set an
> >astersik box with 2 E1 ports to do an IP-to-SS7 conversion. Anyone has
> >done this before?
> >
> I'm looking a signaling gatewa
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:28:15PM -0400, VOIP Consultant wrote:
>
> I have the exact same problem.It would ideal if we could set an
> astersik box with 2 E1 ports to do an IP-to-SS7 conversion. Anyone has
> done this before?
See http://www.ss7box.com/asterisk.html
>
> C. Savinovich
>
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 02:15:06PM +0100, Paul Redstone wrote:
> Hi
>
> In the end we found it easy to record our own using this section in
> extensions.conf. This also meant that we could add our own company specific
> ones in the same voice (not shown here). Basically you get someone to dial
/usr/lib/asterisk/modules\"
-DASTAGIDIR=\"/var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin\" -DBUSYDETECT_MARTIN
-fomit-frame-pointer -c -o ast_expr2f.o ast_expr2f.c
ast_expr2f.c:1772: warning: no previous prototype for `ast_yyget_column'
ast_expr2f.c:1848: warning: no previous prototype for `ast_yyset_
Hi,
(I seem to be having some trouble getting messages to post on the list so
I may be duplicating an earlier post. Apologies if this is the case.)
I am compiling CVS tip Asterisk on a fresh CentOS 3.4 install. I got
this warning:
make ast_expr.a
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk'
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 10:11:53AM -0500, Jay Milk wrote:
> You don't know how to compile asterisk? So why'd you ask about PRI? If
> you're starting from scratch, google for "Getting Started with Asterisk"
> and click on the first link.
I've compiled asterisk from CVS head on a Debian Sid system
if
you know what to google for)
6) here's how to test and troubleshoot your PRI connection
If such a document doesn't exist then I'll start one because I'm getting
ready to go through the process. If it does exist, then I'd like to
follow it.
--
Mike
>
> > -Origin
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 09:41:13PM -0400, Mike M wrote:
> I can't find documentation for setting up PRI.
>
> A push in the right direction would be most appreciated.
Sorry for replying to my own post.
I found:
1) http://www.digium.com/downloads/hw_article
2) the comments in /etc
I can't find documentation for setting up PRI.
A push in the right direction would be most appreciated.
Thanks
--
Mike
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIB
Hi,
I have not incoming phone number to test, but I think I can call
you. If I have termination to your country I'll call you (please give
me your stationary phone, not mobile).
--
Best regards,
Mikemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Hello,
I'm using satellite link (1024/256) Eutelsat.
With Gnugk and Asterisk. The average roundtrip
to my Gateway (DualTalk) is about 650 ms.
I think that's fine for non business telephony,
just for calling to friends.
--
Best regards,
Mikemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I'm using satellite link (1024/256) Eutelsat.
With Gnugk and Asterisk. The average roundtrip
to my Gateway (DualTalk) is about 650 ms.
I think that's fine for non business telephony,
just for calling to friends.
--
Best regards,
Mikemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
e support page. I was using raw Google and was getting too much
chaff.
Enjoy.
--
Mike M.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 09:46, Andrea Venturi wrote:
> here it is the link, awfully slow:
more like s-s-s-s-s-s-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-w-w-w-w-w-w
--
Mike M.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mail
On Monday 02 June 2003 18:47, Scott Lambert wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:46:51PM -0400, Mike M wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > With some trepidation I've come to inquire about platform requirements
> > for * after having spent a couple of hours searching and browsi
s work for back-to-back experimentation
with PRI in this configuration?:
POTS phone-[ * ]---PRI---[ * ]---POTS phone
I assume that I'll need to get a couple line cards and a couple T1 cards.
Thx,
--
Mike M.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[
thread closely because
that's the kind of application that could benefit from having SS7-IMT.
--
Mike M.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
be sufficient
to begin with also.
> * negotiate termination service fees as high as possible
With your clients?
> * get tons of traffic to my network by offering ??? to customers
For * I think an attraction is VoIP to PSTN bridging and access
55 matches
Mail list logo
