John Todd wrote:
[cross-posted to -biz and -users since it could fall into either
category]
Interesting new product that has been introduced that I think some
would be interested in here (at least, those users in the United
States and perhaps Canada): CNAM delivery via IP lookup.
The problem:
anyone have any ideas how I could fix this, this is sort of
important, if it's just me because of my NAT causing it, would doing so
part forwarding and disable NAT support on asterisk and the Sipura fix
this problem?
I'll welcome any input,
Nathan Goodwin
Diamonleaf Communications LLC
So it's a problem with my NAT, that's what I thought.. Ok, I got
another question, with SIP nantive brideing happening, do the CDRs
asterisk keeps still good enough for billing, or are they only good for
the short time asterisk is in the media stream?
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Nathan Goodwin
I love belster, I added a route for the 518 area code, (that covers most
of upstate NY), only thing I wish I could do is get rid of the message
that says how many credits I have left.
I would rather it just report congested is the call can't go though
(doto lack of credits), that way I could
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bellster - cool :-)
Agreed - the announcement is not needed - although it's kind of neat -
perhaps it could be something that was optional/configurable from the
bellster web page?
Nathan Goodwin wrote:
I love belster
you.
Nathan Goodwin
Diamondleaf LLC
Miguel Cavazos wrote:
Hi guys, I have one E1 with 30 channels in Mexico City, I guess that
if i can fill this 30 channels with REAL traffic for 2 or 3 days I can
find new bugs on chan_unicall or I can see how stable it can be. Im
using R2/MFC with chan_unicall
goal. If you can
send alot of traffic while we are doing test i would thank you for that.
Till now we have only got 4 channels at most busy and we need to see
if it will handle a full E1 to test then with 2,3 and 4 E1's
On 13/01/2005, at 12:49 PM, Nathan Goodwin wrote:
I tried to contact you off
After searching the archives, I came acrross a few people mentioning
this, but I never saw anything about what became of it.
Has anyone tried to make a virtual modem that could be directly handled
by astrisk, I saw a while ago that someone was going to try and make one
using the same DSP
