Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk uses 3 seconds to send ACK after OK

2013-03-19 Thread Pan B. Christensen
Taking a look at the DEBUG statements that are associated with the thread processing the SIP response: [Mar 15 13:16:05] DEBUG[27947] netsock2.c: Splitting 'FQDNz:5060' into... [Mar 15 13:16:05] DEBUG[27947] netsock2.c: ...host 'FQDNz' and port '5060'. [Mar 15 13:16:08] DEBUG[27947] netsock2.c: S

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk uses 3 seconds to send ACK after OK

2013-03-18 Thread Pan B. Christensen
Taking a look at the DEBUG statements that are associated with the thread processing the SIP response: [Mar 15 13:16:05] DEBUG[27947] netsock2.c: Splitting 'FQDNz:5060' into... [Mar 15 13:16:05] DEBUG[27947] netsock2.c: ...host 'FQDNz' and port '5060'. [Mar 15 13:16:08] DEBUG[27947] netsock2.c: S

[asterisk-users] Asterisk uses 3 seconds to send ACK after OK

2013-03-15 Thread Pan B. Christensen
Hello! We recently upgraded one of our customers from 1.4.44 to 1.8.15-cert1. We have several other customers running both versions. The customer in question does not use us as their provider as they’re located in a different country. When they make outgoing calls, there is a 3 second delay bet

Re: [asterisk-users] BLF and call-limit in 1.8

2012-12-10 Thread Pan B. Christensen
I finally found the real culprit. The call-limit DB field was mapped to both call-limit and callcounter in the view asterisk uses. The latter is what caused the strange behaviour. Removed both and everything works as expected now. -Pan - Original Message - From: "Pan B. Christ

Re: [asterisk-users] BLF and call-limit in 1.8

2012-12-10 Thread Pan B. Christensen
- From: "Pan B. Christensen" To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] BLF and call-limit in 1.8 Thanks for your reply. I just tested creating a peer in sip.conf and that wo

Re: [asterisk-users] BLF and call-limit in 1.8

2012-12-10 Thread Pan B. Christensen
- Original Message - From: "Matthew Jordan" To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2012 12:43 AM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] BLF and call-limit in 1.8 Thanks for your reply. I just tested creating a peer in sip.conf and that wor

Re: [asterisk-users] BLF and call-limit in 1.8

2012-12-07 Thread Pan B. Christensen
e the ability to the phone to set up more calls. counteronpeer is the same as limitonpeer, just a new name. /O From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Pan B. Christensen Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 9:50 AM

[asterisk-users] BLF and call-limit in 1.8

2012-12-06 Thread Pan B. Christensen
Hello We have recently upgraded our internal PBX from 1.4 to 1.8. This made the BLF lamps on our Polycom phones stop working. After a lot of googling and a lot of testing, I have been unable to find a solution. I did try to change the call-limit value from 4 to 1, and this actually made BLF wo

Re: [asterisk-users] Auto dialing Polycoms and other SIP phones

2011-05-05 Thread Pan B. Christensen
Hello Mike, It is possible for Polycom phones to auto-answer an incoming call with speakerphone. I don’t have the details available right now, but it requires changing the phone’s configuration and sending a custom sip header with the INVITE. Great care should be taken when implementing this, a

[asterisk-users] Compiling extra modules

2011-05-04 Thread Pan B. Christensen
Hello, I have been hired to fix a large and complicated installation using several Kamailio and Asterisk servers. I found that I require some extra modules on some of the Asterisk servers. I was hoping to be able to compile only the modules needed and copy them to where they should be. Asteri

Re: [asterisk-users] Do I need a sip proxy?

2011-01-18 Thread Pan B. Christensen
alternatives would be as well. With kind regards, Pan B. Christensen Senior technician Ibidium AS http://www.ibidium.no/ - Original Message - From: Bruce B To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 4:37 PM Subject: Re: [asteri

Re: [asterisk-users] Call queues on load-balanced asterisks

2011-01-13 Thread Pan B. Christensen
rcial product? With kind regards, Pan B. Christensen Ibidium AS http://www.ibidium.no - Original Message - From: "Thomas Liu" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 5:14 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Call queues on load-balanced asterisks Hi Pan & Dhaval, We have implemen

Re: [asterisk-users] Do I need a sip proxy?

2011-01-11 Thread Pan B. Christensen
Hello Bruce, Your understanding of NAT is correct, and your setup should work. I’m not familiar with Pfsense, but I suspected that your problem was due to a SIP ALG. Pfsense seems to have a SIP ALG and other special handling of VoIP traffic. Hence, you are not using plain NAT. Pfsense is probab

Re: [asterisk-users] Call queues on load-balanced asterisks

2011-01-11 Thread Pan B. Christensen
ue name should be same for all > server and asterisk can call same agent. > > you didnot mentioned that which purpose youwere use queue other wise i can > give answer in better way. > > regards > Dhaval > > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Pan B. Christensen wrote: > &

[asterisk-users] Call queues on load-balanced asterisks

2011-01-07 Thread Pan B. Christensen
Hello, I have been asked to implement the following design: Load-balanced Kamailio servers handling registrations and routing. Load-balanced asterisk feature servers handling voicemail and other things Kamailio cannot do. Plus several load-balanced gateways, but they are not relevant to my qu