Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 pass-through 488 handling problem

2009-06-10 Thread Peter Eisch
> Klaus Darilion wrote: >> Steve Underwood schrieb: >> >>> >>> There seems to be a common misconception about 488. It represents an >>> irrevocable failure of the call. Once a 488 is sent the call is >>> essentially dead. A number of systems are able to continue beyond a 488, >>> and allow

Re: [asterisk-users] Connecting a PSTN gateway to Asterisk using PRI

2008-05-16 Thread Peter Eisch
Using a T1/E1 ISDN interface it's somewhat trivial. In zapata's conf: group=0,11 context=from-pbx-custom switchtype = national signalling = pri_net pridialplan=national prilocaldialplan=national channel => 1-23 group= context=default Note the pri_net for signalling. I have several PRI spans ru

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending caller name out PRI?

2008-05-03 Thread Peter Eisch
On 5/1/08 4:17 PM, "Peter A Eisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to delay (or resend) the name much like the carrier does? > This would then be closer to what the carrier does (as in how I need to > have a Wait(1) before using ${CALLERID(name)}). This assumes that it's a > timing is

Re: [asterisk-users] AsteriskNOW and IE

2008-04-03 Thread Peter Eisch
It might be worth pointing out too that you can't use Firefox 2.x on OS X. I had to solely use Ff on Win2k to do anything at all with the GUI. I hadn't tried linux. YMMV. peter ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com

Re: [asterisk-users] setting callerid across servers

2008-03-11 Thread Peter Eisch
On 3/11/08 2:53 PM, "Niles Ingalls" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 11, 2008, at 3:25 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > >> I have a situation when a T1/PRI line comes into box 1 >> then uses SIP over to box 2 and all my phones are on box 2. >> if the person is not at their desk on ring no answer I