[asterisk-users] peer IP address in CDR

2010-06-29 Thread Remco Bressers
Hi, The subject says it all. Is it possible to put the IP address of the peer in the CDR records? Using AGI maybe? -- Kind regards, Signet bv Remco Bressers T 040 - 707 4 907 F 040 - 707 4 909 E rbress...@signet.nl

Re: [asterisk-users] peer IP address in CDR

2010-06-29 Thread Remco Bressers
: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Met vriendelijke groet, Signet bv Remco Bressers T 040 - 707 4 907 F 040 - 707 4 909 E rbress...@signet.nl altijd online? www.signet.nl -- _ -- Bandwidth

Re: [asterisk-users] peer IP address in CDR

2010-06-29 Thread Remco Bressers
...@skycomuk.com mailto:list-aster...@skycomuk.com wrote: Remco Bressers wrote: Hi, Sorry, but i forgot to notice that i am already using the 'userfield' column so that's not a possibility. Is there any way i can add the IP address to a custom MySQL field in CDR

Re: [asterisk-users] peer IP address in CDR

2010-06-29 Thread Remco Bressers
mailto:list-aster...@skycomuk.com wrote: Remco Bressers wr... -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Pr... -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 license key registration

2010-06-25 Thread Remco Bressers
? How about contacting Digium about this? -- Met vriendelijke groet, Signet bv Remco Bressers T 040 - 707 4 907 F 040 - 707 4 909 E rbress...@signet.nl -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com

[asterisk-users] UDPTL T38 via NAT

2010-06-22 Thread Remco Bressers
=all allow=alaw allow=ulaw qualify=yes nat=no Can anybody tell me how to change this behaviour? Fax isn't working ofcourse. -- Kind regards, Signet bv Remco Bressers T 040 - 707 4 907 F 040 - 707 4 909 E rbress...@signet.nl

Re: [asterisk-users] UDPTL T38 via NAT

2010-06-22 Thread Remco Bressers
On 06/22/2010 02:51 PM, Johann Steinwendtner wrote: On 2010-06-22 12:36, Remco Bressers wrote: Dear list, I've got the following setup : [FAX-ATA]--[PBX LAN]--[Firewall]--[PBX WAN]-[upstream SIP] On the PBX's we run Asterisk 1.4.33 with t38pt_udptl=yes in [general]. The FAX ATA

Re: [asterisk-users] UDPTL T38 via NAT

2010-06-22 Thread Remco Bressers
On 06/22/2010 04:35 PM, Johann Steinwendtner wrote: On 2010-06-22 15:16, Remco Bressers wrote: On 06/22/2010 02:51 PM, Johann Steinwendtner wrote: On 2010-06-22 12:36, Remco Bressers wrote: Dear list, I've got the following setup : [FAX-ATA]--[PBX LAN]--[Firewall]--[PBX WAN]-[upstream

Re: [asterisk-users] UDPTL T38 via NAT

2010-06-22 Thread Remco Bressers
On 06/22/2010 04:38 PM, marek cervenka wrote: On 06/22/2010 02:51 PM, Johann Steinwendtner wrote: On 2010-06-22 12:36, Remco Bressers wrote: Dear list, I've got the following setup : [FAX-ATA]--[PBX LAN]--[Firewall]--[PBX WAN]-[upstream SIP] On the PBX's we run Asterisk 1.4.33

Re: [asterisk-users] Changing storm-prevention behaviour in logger.conf

2010-04-19 Thread Remco Bressers
According to https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=14905 there is a storm prevention mechanism in newer Asterisks. If i look in my logfile, i see : [2010-04-17 15:12:01] NOTICE[1190] chan_sip.c: Registration from ' sip:x...@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx' failed for 'xx.xx.xx.xx' - Wrong password

Re: [asterisk-users] Changing storm-prevention behaviour in logger.conf

2010-04-18 Thread Remco Bressers
On Apr 18, 2010, at 12:40 AM, Barry Miller wrote: On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:14:23PM +0200, Remco Bressers wrote: Dear List, According to https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=14905 there is a storm prevention mechanism in newer Asterisks. If i look in my logfile, i see : [2010-04-17

[asterisk-users] Changing storm-prevention behaviour in logger.conf

2010-04-17 Thread Remco Bressers
cannot use fail2ban anymore. Is there any option to disable this behaviour, or even better, add it to logger.conf so anybody can decide what to do? I just want all logging and it seems impossible now. Maybe a patch on the source? Regards, Remco Bressers Signet B.V