Re: [asterisk-users] BT IP Exchange interconnect

> > Thanks. > We have, asterisk 100% + Kamailio... 9 months of work (maybe less now) :) -- Regards, Senad Jordanovic, CEO Bicom Systems Ltd, +1 619-760-7770 +44 20 3399 8877 se...@bicomsystems.com www.bicomsystems.com ___ -- Bandwidth and Colo

Re: [asterisk-users] Russia Calls Skype/VoIP Security Threat

0090724?feedType=RSS&feedName=technologyNews&rpc=22&sp=true >> >> ___ >> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- >> >> asterisk-users mailing list >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >> http://lists.digium.

Re: [asterisk-users] Announcement: Howler-optimised G.729A Solution for Asterisk

Jay Fenton wrote: > [ Optimised G.729A 'Howlet' for Asterisk & FreSWITCH ] > > Howler Technologies are proud to announce today the launch of > their fully indemnified and highly optimised G.729A solution > for Asterisk, including a unique floating license model. Why would someone buy it instead o

Re: [asterisk-users] Current state of Asterisk and Virtualization?

Gavin Henry wrote: > Hi all, > > In a pure VoIP env, what is the current state of do's and don't s of > virtualizing * in order to provide multiple separate instances, say > for hosting lots of Asterisk-gui/FreePBX/a-n-other gui? > > I've read lots of threads going back to 2007 and I'm in the gen

Re: [asterisk-users] multiple asterisks in a server

Danny Nicholas wrote: > It is possible but not easy. Virtualization isn't necessarily the answer > because of sharing the physical device(s) - If you're a SIP-only > environment, then that wouldn't be a problem, but most * installs (IMO) use > some flavor of Zap/DAHDI which has to be addressed/loc

Re: [asterisk-users] fax / t38 gateway

Olivier wrote: > > > 2008/10/24 Brendan Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Do you have any recommendations for good ones, or, non-buggy ones? Some of or resellers are using 2102 apparently with no issues :) Senad www.bicomsystems.com _

Re: [asterisk-users] Softphone Framework or Libraries

Ricardo Melendez wrote: > Hi to all, I have a project for Customer Relationship Management > interfaced with asterisk, I need send the CallerID to my application > (via http or tcp/ip), When the phone rings I need to launch a pop-up > windows to the Call Center Agent to display customer info,

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.0 CDR billsec and duration not working from h extension

Eric Chamberlain wrote: > Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong? Why doesn't CDR(duration) > or CDR(billsec) return the correct values? > > cdr.conf > > endbeforehexten=yes > > > extensions.conf > > [macro-Dial] > ; ${ARG1} - Dial String > > exten => s,1,Dial(${ARG1},,M(post-dial)) >

Re: [asterisk-users] Short question: CPU hardware requirements for Asterisk

Steve Edwards wrote: > On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Alejandro Cabrera Obed wrote: > >> Dear all, just a short question: >> >> What is the best CPU hardware requirements (CPU, memory, hard drive) to >> install Asterisk with SIP/RTP protocol for 100-150 users, and routing >> the RTP traffic by itself (no di

Re: [asterisk-users] Callcenter monitoring tool

voip crazy wrote: > Hello all, > > Anyone expecialized with call center monitoring and reporting solution > based on asterisk. > A client of us, want to install a call center reporting solution for > an asterisk server but I do not know which could be the best tool for > that. > I need a tool for

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk end-user GUI?

Ken D'Ambrosio wrote: > I badly want to roll out Asterisk at my job. Unfortunately, my boss is > dazzled by shiny objects. We had a vendor in today who showed us their > system which, honestly, didn't suck -- but boy, is it going to be > expensive! One major component of the eye candy was an end

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco vs Asterisk

Patrick wrote: > Al Baker wrote: >> Quote >> >> "Yet amazingly (if this is, indeed, a source of amazement for you), CCM >> and other Cisco software can be just as buggy as anything OSS, if not >> worse. " >> >> This is simply NOT TRUE and shows a complete lack of understanding of modern >> softw

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco vs Asterisk

T G wrote: > I'm a CCIE and CCVP. I have worked in the Cisco TSBU on both CCM and > Telepresence systems I have two IP patents for the VoiP Lite protocols > and have been designing and building OSS IPBXs for companies including > Google going back to 2001. > > I'm not mentioning any of that to

Re: [asterisk-users] [asterisk-biz] New faxing protocol. Good/Bad ?

Dovid Bender wrote: > > Hi List, > I was thinking the other day that even with T.38 there are still some > issues with faxing. I was thinking of a protocol that instead of just > sending down the fax tones an ATA or "VOIP fax machine" would get the > entire fax convert it into some sort of imag

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk virtualization on VMWARESX infrastructure

IP? Senad > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Senad > Jordanovic > Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 3:37 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk virtual

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk virtualization on VMWARE SX infrastructure

Michiel van Baak wrote: > On 14:42, Sat 17 May 08, Steve Totaro wrote: >> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:18 PM, nik600 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> what about asterisk virtualization on VMWARE XS infrastructure? >>> >>> The system installed will manage a call center with 50 operator, >>> qu

Re: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time?

Bill Andersen wrote: > Senad Jordanovic wrote: >> However, I will say that it is not asterisk but people/company >> deploying it. Generally speaking after deployment, and as long >> users are "using" the system normally, no reboot is required. > > I'm t

Re: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time?

> > 130 physical extensions including 24x7 inbound call centre > > Debian on Dell server > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uptime > 13:15:31 up 192 days, 23:49, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 here is one more running multi tenant Hosted PBXes: saul ~ # uptime 18:59:11 up 263 days, 23:50,

Re: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time?

John Novack wrote: > > Bill Andersen wrote: >> This is not a troll. I've used my real email because I want this >> taken seriously. I'm not trying to make anyone mad, I just want >> some real discussion on this issue. Please bare with me... >> >> I'm a USER of Asterisk. We purchased 3 commerci

Re: [asterisk-users] Druid Open Source Edition

Steve Totaro wrote: > No pitch here. It is you making the sales pitch. > > This is the "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > list which you and Dean repeatedly use for commercial purposes. I have stayed away and declared will not continue on this subject any further as oth

Re: [asterisk-users] Druid Open Source Edition

Outback Dingo wrote: > this I definatley concur Sure no problem. I have no problem with that. Steve do you want to continue of the pitch? Senad ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list T

Re: [asterisk-users] Druid Open Source Edition

>> While we are on subject of Druid... Look at Druids trunks administration >> fields, you will find remarkable similarities in trunks administration >> with PBXware... (this is the last time I bothered to look) >> >> I wonder why? :) >> >> >> >> Senad > > > Yes, but this Druid is "Opensour

Re: [asterisk-users] Druid Open Source Edition

Steve Totaro wrote: > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Senad Jordanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Steve Totaro wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Senad Jordanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> Joshua Wilson wrote: >&g

Re: [asterisk-users] Druid Open Source Edition

Steve Totaro wrote: > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Senad Jordanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Joshua Wilson wrote: >> > It is the same whether you are using trixbox, switchbox, pbxware or any >> > other system roughly. You have to use their system. Some

Re: [asterisk-users] Druid Open Source Edition

Joshua Wilson wrote: > It is the same whether you are using trixbox, switchbox, pbxware or any > other system roughly. You have to use their system. Sometimes, this is > the only way to make sure everything they support is installed and > integrated properly without problems. > Hi Joshua, PBX

Re: [asterisk-users] Microsoft Office Communications Server

Razza wrote: > On 11/03/2008, *Senad Jordanovic* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > I would suggest to you learning how to use text emails and quoting first > then you may have some responses that may be your worth while. > > C

Re: [asterisk-users] Microsoft Office Communications Server

Milton Calnek wrote: > > Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >> TV sets and such are simple enough. But when the device gets more >> sofficticated then, yes: reboot tends to become a first reaction. > > You say "first reaction" like there's some other choice with Windows. > >> Right. Asterisk never crashes. As

Re: [asterisk-users] Microsoft Office Communications Server

sktop user requirements let alone crucial every day in/out business > communications tool like a phone system. > > At the end, if you do not answer a call some else will!!! > > > Senad Jordanovic > www.bicomsystems.com <http://www.bicomsystems.com> > > What utter

Re: [asterisk-users] Microsoft Office Communications Server

ill DEMAND a service for your car/TV,shoes or you may return it or whatever. So.. Imagine how much your business will be affected with a phone SYSTEM based on a such operating system, one which can not even meet basic desktop user requirements let alone crucia

Re: [asterisk-users] I need the least expensive way to do this

John Novack wrote: > You get what you pay for, if you are lucky > > Go with a used hybrid PBX, best bet is a Panasonic that suppots both > POTS phones and prop phones. It will outlast ANY micro-computer based > desktop hardware. > Perfect for a church or very small office or retail business. Yo

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk as a softswith for a small ISP

Sigma Networks wrote: > you should take a look at Thirdlane's MultiTenant Edition management > solution to partition Asterisk easily. > > http://www.thirdlane.com/solutions/service-providers > > Feel free to contact me offline. Well... If you need hardware all complete solution we have vSWIT

Re: [asterisk-users] Looking for PSTN provider with unlimited inbound/outbound plan

Steve Finkelstein wrote: > Hi Senad, > > Did you happen to find out if it was indeed anywhere in the US48? > > Thanks! > > - sf Hi Steve, Yes it is. Contact me of the list if you need to. Regards, Senad > > On 1/2/08, *Senad Jordanovic* < [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [asterisk-users] Looking for PSTN provider with unlimited inbound/outbound plan

Dovid B wrote: > Senad, > You can get unlimited as in FREE to any where in US48 or just local ? As far I know it is anywhere to US48. I will find out and get back to you. Senad > > - Original Message - > From: "Senad Jordanovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [asterisk-users] Looking for PSTN provider with unlimited inbound/outbound plan

Justin Case wrote: > Tell me when to stop laughing. Multiple channels and unlimited minutes ? > No sane person will give that to you. > Yap I agree... but but for about $900 per month one could get T1 (24 channels) unlimited in/out as far I seen last time our providers rates. Senad > On De

Re: [asterisk-users] Call Center Setup on asterisk

Godson Gera wrote: > Contact me off list ;-) > > On Dec 12, 2007 5:39 PM, satish patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Dear all > > I need call center setup on asterisk so i need do > doucment and book .is it available on net S

Re: [asterisk-users] Mystery phone!

's. Here is original manufacturer: http://www.tecomproduct.com/IP2008.htm Enjoy!!! Senad Jordanovic (Central European Time) Bicom Systems Ltd +1 619-760- ex 7001 +44 20 7043 3480 ex 7001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.bicomsystems.com ___ --Bandwid

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Virtual Appliances

Zaheer Master wrote: > Hi All, > Does anyone know of a good virtual appliance for Asterisk under VMware? > I am very interested in the "JEOS" concept for reducing the attack surface > of a machine, so I think an appliance might be a good way to do this. BTW, > I'll be using this with direct SIP Tr

Re: [asterisk-users] CALEA enforcement guidelines according to Comcast

Kristian Kielhofner wrote: > Sounds like Comcast's manual for CALEA compliance was leaked. Pretty > interesting read if you are curious: > > http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/ > > Direct link (PDF): > > http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/docs/handbook.pdf > nice one Kris :) Senad __

Re: [asterisk-users] "Click to Talk" Web Applications with Asterisk

zoachien wrote: > Google for mexuar. > > Zoa Or look at one that works with MS Windows, Linux or Apple http://www.bicomsystems.com/products/C/P/319/382/ Senad ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-user

Re: [asterisk-users] Multitenant or Multiple virtual machines

Edgar Guadamuz wrote: > A question. are the clients going to be able to manage the PBX? Yes... > or are you going to give them the PBX service without access to each > server? > Up to you... Senad ___ Sign up now for AstriCon 2007! Septembe

Re: [asterisk-users] Multitenant or Multiple virtual machines

Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:38:40PM +0100, Senad Jordanovic wrote: >> Any opinions/comments/recommendations? Before anyone recommends just >>> buying the virtual PBX service from someone else, we _really_ want >>> to do this in-house :) >> &

Re: [asterisk-users] Multitenant or Multiple virtual machines

Any opinions/comments/recommendations? Before anyone recommends just > buying the virtual PBX service from someone else, we _really_ want to > do this in-house :) I am all for using VPS (virtual private servers) instead of the "classic" multitenant. Here are some reasons: - a VPS provides a Li

Re: [asterisk-users] GUI for Asterisk realtime

>> >> > Thanks. I had googled as well and found basically the same links. We > are building a DUNDi/Realtime cluster and need gui management. > > Mike.. http://www.bicomsystems.com/products/ Senad ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by ht

Re: [asterisk-users] GUI for Asterisk realtime

Mike Clark wrote: > Are there any nice GUIs out there for Asterisk Realtime? Google > doesn't yield much. I spent a day trying to get VoiceOne to work > without much success. > > Thanks, > > Mike Clark Are you looking for open source or commercial? Senad __

[asterisk-users] Outcall 1.40 released

the taskbar - Added all DLL dependencies into the setup Available at: http://outcall.sourceforge.net/ Regards, Senad Jordanovic www.bicomsystems.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 (212) 400 7921 +44 (20) 7043 3488 Regards, Senad Jordanovic www.bicomsystems.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 (212)

Re: [asterisk-users] Blip every 30 seconds?

Joe acquisto wrote: > Telephone "conversations" that are being recorded, are supposed to > "beep" periodically, to alert/remind the recorded person that the > conversation is being recorded. > > Perhaps that is what you are hearing? > > joe a. > On 8/2/2007 at 8:47 AM, Matt <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [asterisk-users] Hi ability solution

Steve Totaro wrote: > Senad Jordanovic wrote: >>> Any High availiability solution for asterisk? >>> VoipCrazy >>> >> >> >> http://www.bicomsystems.com/files/projects/serverware/SERVERware.pdf >> > Is this free? > > Benefit

Re: [asterisk-users] Hi ability solution

>Any High availiability solution for asterisk? >VoipCrazy http://www.bicomsystems.com/files/projects/serverware/SERVERware.pdf ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or upda

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk GUI

Troy Ayers wrote: > I would have been convinced if you had not top-posted! heh > > > Rob Schall wrote: >> Tom, >> >> I disagree with your argument for a number of reasons. Each of these >> reasons should be more than enough to convince you I'm correct and >> you should do it my way and only my

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk GUI

> > For example, a user could post a message to the list asking "I'm new > to Linux and Asterisk. Should edit my dialplan by hand, use FreePBX, > or buy a commercial solution?" Imagine the response as you tried to > convince them to buy PBXWare, FreePBX users try to convince them that > the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk GUI

Tom Rymes wrote: > On Jun 16, 2007, at 4:37 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 08:55:24PM +0100, Senad Jordanovic wrote: >>> Brett Crapser wrote: >>>> On Saturday 16 June 2007 02:24 am, Senad Jordanovic wrote: >>>>

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk GUI

Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 08:55:24PM +0100, Senad Jordanovic wrote: >> Brett Crapser wrote: >>> On Saturday 16 June 2007 02:24 am, Senad Jordanovic wrote: >>>> Paul Hales wrote: >>>>> GUI bad! CLI good! >>>>> >&

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk GUI

Brett Crapser wrote: > On Saturday 16 June 2007 02:24 am, Senad Jordanovic wrote: >> Paul Hales wrote: >>> GUI bad! CLI good! >>> >>> PaulH >> >> Really...? >> >> So explain why every major PBX manufacturer has GUI of some

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk GUI

Paul Hales wrote: > GUI bad! CLI good! > > PaulH Really...? So explain why every major PBX manufacturer has GUI of some sort? Surely they would have had CLI only if GUI is "bad"!!! Senad www.bicomsystems.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provi

RE: [asterisk-users] Call Center Application

bilal ghayyad wrote: > Hi list; > > I am looking for an application that can be used with call center, in > this application we can integrate the telephony part of the call > center (like CTI Client ad so on), any one can advise for a good > application to be used with Asterisk Call Center? >

RE: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Business Edition Question

_ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 April 2007 08:15 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Business Edition Question Hi all, Thanks for the posts. We i think i should

RE: [asterisk-users] Softphone that supports central provisioning?

Andrew Furey wrote: > On 24/04/07, Senad Jordanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >>>> Dear Senad, >>>> >>>> The setup program for your soft phone can be downloaded from here: >>>> http://malwareserver.com

Re: [asterisk-users] Softphone that supports central provisioning?

Stephen Bosch wrote: > Hi, Tzafrir: > > Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >> Dear Senad, >> >> The setup program for your soft phone can be downloaded from here: >> http://malwareserver.com/malware.exe";>http://LINK >> >> During the setup you will be asked for configuration file. Please use >> attached file.

RE: [asterisk-users] Softphone that supports central provisioning?

Stephen Bosch wrote: > Hi, Tzafrir: > > Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >> Dear Senad, >> >> The setup program for your soft phone can be downloaded from here: >> http://malwareserver.com/malware.exe";>http://LINK >> >> During the setup you will be asked for configuration file. Please use >> attached file.

RE: [asterisk-users] Softphone that supports central provisioning?

Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 08:59:27AM +0100, Senad Jordanovic wrote: > >> What about creating a configuration file on server for each soft >> phone extension automatically and then importing that file into the >> soft phone? >> >> In an

RE: [asterisk-users] Softphone that supports central provisioning?

Philipp Kempgen wrote: > Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:48:20AM -0400, James FitzGibbon wrote: >>> Has anyone found a softphone that supports pulling it's >>> configuration from a central server via TFTP/FTP/HTTP, much like >>> hard desk phones use? >> >> Why would you want

RE: [asterisk-users] outCALL- the open source Asterisk integrationapplicaiton for Microsoft Outlook

To download a copy of OutCall, please visit > http://outcall.sf.net/ .Documentation is available at > www.bicomsystems.com/docs/outcall/ . I forgot to include in my original post: Please use http://sf.net for any further communications in regards to outCALL Thanks Senad _

[asterisk-users] outCALL- the open source Asterisk integration applicaiton for Microsoft Outlook

ation licensed under BSD license in order to further stimulate development and use of Asterisk "said Senad Jordanovic, the systems architect at Bicom Systems Ltd. "We released OutCALL as open source in the wish that the application would to be of good use to everyone and to be enjoy

RE: [asterisk-users] Re: Two or More Bri Cards

Hi Senad, Could you elaborate ? Which type BRI cards did you mix ? Which driver and channel ? -- Hi HFC based chip based one port cards and Jugnhaans quadBRI using bristuff drivers. We have spent log time making sure the bristuff drivers are handled correctly for our customers ne

RE: [asterisk-users] Re: Two or More Bri Cards

Edoardo Serra wrote: > I Always had very bad experiences with 2 HFC cards in the same box > > I strongly suggest you to use a dual port card > > Regards > > Edoardo Interesting... I mean one would think that is the case all the time. In another words, that is logical, and I though the same but

RE: [asterisk-users] Need comparison between PBXtra, Trixbox, Thirdlane, Druid, Aheeva etc.

Hi, For a customer, I am looking for a good and reliable Asterisk based system. Five servers will be installed at different locations and will be linked together with each other. This system will work as a call center as well. It has to be a stable and reliable. Customer also needs GUIs for system

RE: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and outlook

> Hi list. > > Has anyone used any commercial or open source application to > integrate Asterisk into MS Outlook 2003 which can be used to place > calls directly to contacts from Outlook? > > And if so how well does it work? Here you go... Enjoy:) http://www.bicomsystems.com/products/C/P/31

RE: [asterisk-users] Management GUI

Hi Scott... http://www.bicomsystems.com/products/ Senad From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Pinhorne Sent: 08 December 2006 11:00 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Management GUI Hi All Ca

RE: [asterisk-users] A question on ISDN cards... (in the UK)

> Would anyone like to recommend a good and reasonable quality ISDN > card for use in the UK, as after a lot of good results with TDM400P > cards with several systems installed now, I need to look at a few > ISDN BRI (old business highway about to move to ISDN2) and possibly a > single-line PRI (I

RE: [asterisk-users] OutCall Release

Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 03:41:08PM +0100, Stephen Wingfield wrote: >> LONDON, UK (14th November 2006) - Bicom Systems announced today it >> has released its first freeware software to the "Asterisk >> Community", OutCall. Tzarif, Thanks for your contribution in clarificati

RE: [asterisk-users] Desktop integration

Tim Panton wrote: > On 13 Nov 2006, at 13:15, Ondrej Valousek wrote: > >> Hi Dean, >> >> I will check that site - thanks for the hint. >> The biggest problem I see with authentication and I do not think >> mexuar could help me here (and I am definitely going to pay $2000 for >> it :-) But it is a

RE: [asterisk-users] Reception Console

Viktor Tatianin wrote: > Hello Paul > > Yes, I very interesting Hi We have MS Windows based operator consol/ panel available :) http://www.bicomsystems.com/products/C/P/319/154_2571/# Senad ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -

RE: [asterisk-users] Multiple asterisk same GUI

Michiel van Baak wrote: > On 15:52, Thu 28 Sep 06, Sharon Lim wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> Im wondering, is it possible to have single GUI on same DB but write >> to different asterisk server? Means assuming you have 3 asterisk >> server with same configurations. Therefore with the same DB but it >>

RE: [asterisk-users] High Availability with PRI failover

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi > > After a month or so using Asterisk we've had or first downtime period > due to a faulty RAM chip on the server, so we're starting to think > about the possible high-availability solutions. Hi If you can afford it, below will give you total fault tolerant solutio

RE: [asterisk-users] RE VoipNow 1.2.0 Beta

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yes it is an addon of Plesk, thats stating the obvious. But while > your complaining about people writing stuff to use what are you > doing. If your not a developer don't critisize the developers. I > see nothing more than you displaying that you are the Vice President

RE: [asterisk-users] VoipNow 1.2.0 Beta

>>> Another reason not to do business in the USA! >> >> Any good suggestions on where to buy rack space in a country that is >> not honoring stupid US patent law and has great and secure Internet >> connections? >> >> Tom >> > > Ehrm... Russia, China... > > You could also try several European coun

RE: [asterisk-users] VoipNow 1.2.0 Beta

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Tom Vile wrote: >> Did you look on the site? >> >> http://www.4psa.com/products/voipnow/demo.php > > > Does above means that the license for voipnow need to be paid to > packet 8 as well? > > http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060613/sftu062.html > > > > Senad Hate replying on

RE: [asterisk-users] DNS lookups failing for SIP register

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Joshua Colp wrote: >>> Putting an entry in /etc/hosts, or using an IP address in the >>> register line, works. >> >> That's really really weird, it should use the system to lookup the >> hostname... did restarting Asterisk not help? > > Joshua, > > That was exactly my rea

RE: [asterisk-users] VoipNow 1.2.0 Beta

Tom Vile wrote: > Did you look on the site? > > http://www.4psa.com/products/voipnow/demo.php Does above means that the license for voipnow need to be paid to packet 8 as well? http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060613/sftu062.html Senad ___ --Bandwid

RE: [asterisk-users] Server redundancy

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 14:34 -0400, Mike Lynchfield wrote: >> #3b.. we need multiple listening addies.. since asterisk can only >> listen to one ip its sucks for now That was case for asterisk 1.x ___ --Bandwidth and Colocatio

RE: [asterisk-users] Fonality vs TrixBox UI

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 09:35:18PM +0100, Senad Jordanovic wrote: >> >>> This is all based on information from several (>8) months >>> ago. Things could have changed. >> >> That is exactly my understanding of Fonality produc

RE: [asterisk-users] Fonality vs TrixBox UI

> This is all based on information from several (>8) months > ago. Things could have changed. That is exactly my understanding of Fonality product as it stands. PBXware on the other hand offers: DELIVERY METHOD in CD, tarball, appliance or hosted (VPS) formats. An appliance for wide range of i

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TE420P/TE415P?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > - C F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I like the TC400P card, how many T1s will that take? or is it just a >> Daughter card on the TE4xx ? How many channels can it transcode? > > Neither. It's a separate device, entirely unrelated to any TDM cards > (which means it can

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone see this?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:57:02AM +0100, Senad Jordanovic wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Dunno if anyone else has seen this yet: >>> >> http://www.scmagazine.com/us/news/article/563800/vulnerabilities+put+asteris >> k+tele

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone see this?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dunno if anyone else has seen this yet: > http://www.scmagazine.com/us/news/article/563800/vulnerabilities+put+asteris k+telephone+systems+risk/ we do not run asterisk (or any other critical services including PBXware) as root on the host as normal process. we are using

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Turning AAAH into a call-center

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I believe there are quite different levels for the Asterisk market, so > most people who run call centers wont feel confident in downloading a > couple of ISOs from the internet and setting things up themselves. > l. Absolutely correct. I could not agree more. Senad

RE: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk management interface

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 2006/5/8, Senad Jordanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Why would you need to create your own? >> >> Many reasons: >> >> 1. not relying on already busy open source developers > > Free projects are getting better that closed

RE: [Asterisk-Users] *.conf utilities for Asterisk

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering if anyone has any recommendations for *.conf > generators for Asterisk. Creating *.conf files manually for Asterisk > requires too much effort for what I do other than minor tweaking. I > run Asterisk as a network appliance (Astlinux on CF) s

RE: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk management interface

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Those are reasons for WANTING to create your own, he specifically > said "I HAVE to make my own" and I wanted to know why he HAS TO > create his own when there are fantastics products already available. > There is a huge difference in saying "I would like to create my own

RE: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk management interface

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://www.freepbx.org > > Why would you need to create your own? Many reasons: 1. not relying on already busy open source developers 2. creating something that you can possibly offer as your own commercial offering 3. have it designed exactly they way you want it from

RE: [Asterisk-Users] billing realtime

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Senad > > i looking for same thing, that is consider absolutetimeout as a > timer, everytime is near t zero, 3 secs for example, renew it, > reacalculate real credit, and start again until some of the parties > hangup. > > The problem is how to iterate in a

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: billing realtime

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Senad Jordanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The way we solved this is: >> >> 1/ Each account has incoming/outgoing channels >> 2/ Once call is started then the total balance is divided

RE: [Asterisk-Users] billing realtime

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed April 26 2006 16:31, Jon Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> JP Carballo wrote: >>> Yes, certainly, through deadagi. >>> I just have one question though, why reinvent the wheel? >>> There are prepaid systems that work with asterisk. >> >> I have yet to find a prep

[Asterisk-Users] Digium cards for sale

Hi, We got following surplus for sale: TE210P $700 TE410P $1100 TE411P $1950 Bundle (All 3 cards) please make an offer :) Cards not used except for development testing. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk management interface

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Looks very nice.. Is it GPL, GNU? PBXware interface is not GPL/GNU currently. Some time in the future we may release is it under GPL/GNU license :)... ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk management interface

Anton Krall wrote: > For most of my everyday needs I ended up coding my own small one in > MySQL and PHP, does the job I need but its far from complete.. to me, > AMP is still the king :) > > Hi everyone, > i am face with an asterisk use management interface, at the pressent, > i am using AMP (ast

RE: [Asterisk-Users] call-limit kills hints

> The outgoinglimit never worked, so we haven't had that part working > for a long time. It's been disabled in the code since 1.0 I think. Sure... I was just informed that was the case :)... hence why we never used it but implemented an alternative method instead! Thanks for your reply! ___

RE: [Asterisk-Users] call-limit kills hints

> Since the device status system relies on it, I rewrote the > incominglimit and outgoinglimit into the combined call-limit. > The keywords "incominglimit" and "outgoinglimit" will be removed, but > call-limit will stay. > > /O Olle/// What happens when it not a simple phone/ATA but a providers

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendations on web interface for IT staff

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am proposing an Asterisk system of many servers to service multiple > departments in a number of locatations to a large client. They have an > IT department but their Linux skills are weak and they are likely to > face a high churn rate in staff so it would not be wise

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Meetme and Sipura SPA-941 - bad jitter/distortion

> > I'd greatly appreciate any help or thoughts! try: RTP Packet size on "SIP" tab ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/list

  1   2   3   4   5   >