Check out the X Boy/Girl friend feature.
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+config+extensions.conf
Around the middle of the page.
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Oravits
Reply-to: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Here's my take on the attack... Sigh...
http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/11/sip-brute-force-attacks-escalate-over-halloween-weekend/
Stu
- --
Open up the window Let some air into this room I think I'm almost
chokin' From the smell of stale
a large number of systems blacklisted. If
someone was to spoof 1000s of addresses that cause operators to
black-list those addresses, they could knock quite a few systems off the
map. This could cause legitimate operators to get blocked, or, discredit
the current method used to detect and block SIP b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
We are also seeing an increase in attacks. And yes, there is a benefit
to blocking them. They tend to go away if you have them restricted,
where if you let them go at it, they will sit on your host for sometimes
hours.
Stu
On 10/30/2010 12:43 PM,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Randy R wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Fred Posner
> wrote:
>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Gordon Henderson wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Frank Bulk wrote:
>>>
Please take note of their posting:
https://aws.amazon.com/s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Randy R wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
>>> I a related question, if the IP addresses were spoofed, how could a
>>> response be directed back? Don't the register attempts, because they
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Randy R wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Tzafrir Cohen
> wrote:
>> It seems that at least Slashdot is responsive:
>>
>> http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/04/17/2059256/SIP-Attacks-From-Amazon-EC2-Going-Unaddressed
>
> Yes, there's a lot of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
We reported abuse Saturday morning... As of yet, no change in traffic.
I have sent requests upstream to filter all UDP/5060 traffic from EC-2
range to stop the DDOS that we are under, but have only gotten 2 of our
4 providers to comply.
At this poi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Take a look at Read()
Stu
David Klaverstyn wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> What function or application do I use to get people to type digits into
> the phone and store the value into a variable? The application
> WaitExten is not what I want that will ju
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Not sure where to report this...
http://www.asterisk.org/downloads
Right hand download box, Asterisk 1.4.17 points to 1.4.1
Just a heads up.
Stu
- --
And all I can do is keep on telling you, I want you, I need you,
But there aint no way Im ever go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey all,
I'm having problems with calls dropping after 15 - 20 seconds from a
particular provider. The are using a NexTone gateway. Here are the details:
Successful call:
INVITE cseq 1 From NexTone
100 Trying cseq 1 Fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Looks like there is a requirement for a later Zaptel the the 1.4.0
release for the zap_chan driver to build...
Stu
- --
Randomly Generated Fortune Tag:
They spell it "da Vinci" and pronounce it "da Vinchy". Foreigners
always spell better than they p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Are you using Answer() before VoiceMailMain()?
Stu
Timothy McKee wrote:
> I've been running the 8/1/2004 Head release up until a little over a
> week ago. I was forced to due to a card failure to upgrade to 1.2.16
> without any advance preparation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This might sound strange, but is there anyway for Asterisk to set extra
sip headers based on a sip phone returning a 302 in a dialplan?
Example:
PSTN => Asterisk => SIP-Phone, SIP-Phone returns 302 Redirect, Asterisk
sets X-Something: Some_Value & X-
ields in the parking lot call to tell me
the origin of the call... I see the same problem with a call transfers...
What am I missing here?
Any help would be great!
Stuart Sheldon
- --
Randomly Generated Fortune Tag:
Q: Why is it that the more accuracy you demand from an interpol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would look at ventilation if I were you. Drive failures at the rate
you are talking about can usually be traced back to thermal failures.
Just a thought
Stu
Dushyanth wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Iam having a peculiar problem with my asterisk installa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I can confirm the same problem, it looks like the oct612x directory tree
is missing from the tarball
Stu
Bill Maidment wrote:
> Hi
> I've just tried to compile the zaptel-1.2.9 release and I get the
> following error:
>
> HOSTCC /usr/local/src/zap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maybe I missed something, but which side provides the clock? Have you
tried reversing the clock source? Sure looks like timing errors to me.
Stu Sheldon
Sterling Moses wrote:
> Greetings list,
>
> I have been beating around a problem for a while no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey all,
I have a x86 Pentium D asterisk system with two Digium 400's in it. I am
establishing a IAX2 Connection to another Asterisk system running on a
Solaris server.
When a call is placed between the two systems, everything seems fine for
a variab
19 matches
Mail list logo
