Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_misdn crashes : init_stack: success but entitylist not empty

2005-11-25 Thread Yoann Le Bihan
2005/11/25, Jose Limeres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yoann, > I am going through a similar problem you reported in a past posting: > > Nov 24 17:49:31 ERROR[9326] chan_misdn.c: Unable to initialize mISDN > Nov 24 17:49:31 WARNING[9326] loader.c: chan_misdn.so: load_module > failed, returning -1 > Nov 24

Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_misdn crashes : init_stack: success but entitylist not empty

2005-11-25 Thread Yoann Le Bihan
All right, thanks a lot for your answers ! :) I also contacted beronet support (as they develop chan_misdn)... this bug is known and should be fixed within a few weeks... Alleluiiia ;)) I'm compiling with gcc32... hope it runs ! :-) Cheers, YLB. 2005/11/25, Kib Eki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_misdn crashes : init_stack: success but entitylist not empty

2005-11-24 Thread Yoann Le Bihan
: cb_log called with > out-of-range port number! (0) > Nov 24 17:49:31 WARNING[9326] loader.c: Loading module chan_misdn.so failed! > > How did you solve it? > Thanks, jose > > On 25/11/05, Yoann Le Bihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > >

[Asterisk-Users] chan_misdn crashes : init_stack: success but entitylist not empty

2005-11-24 Thread Yoann Le Bihan
Hi, Asterisk 1.2 on FC4, all is right, I'm happy. But when I try to load chan_misdn after a successful install, I get it : # asterisk -vvvgc [...] [chan_features.so] => (Feature Proxy Channel) == Registered channel type 'Feature' (Feature Proxy Channel Driver) [chan_misdn.so] => (Channel driv

[Asterisk-Users] asterisk can't load chan_misdn (FC4)

2005-11-15 Thread Yoann Le Bihan
Hi ! :) I just installed Asterisk, Zaptel and mISDN on a linux box based on a Fedora Core 4. When I start asterisk, it says : Nov 16 06:10:02 ERROR[27460]: chan_misdn.c:3388 load_module: Unable to initialize mISDN Nov 16 06:10:02 WARNING[27460]: loader.c:345 ast_load_resource: chan_misdn.so: load

[Asterisk-Users] Re: MOH failures (bad quality with interruptions)

2005-09-20 Thread Yoann Le Bihan
rruptions of my MusicOnHold : simply apply the hack described at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+mpg123+faking+it I used Option 1 and converted wav files to raw files using sox. My MOH is now running perfectly ;)) Yeeppee... Cheers, YLB. 2005/9/21, Yoann Le Bihan <[EMAIL

[Asterisk-Users] MOH failures (bad quality with interruptions)

2005-09-20 Thread Yoann Le Bihan
Hi ! :) Does someone have an idea of the reason why my MusicOnHold (with clean mp3 downloaded from http://aussievoip.com.au/wiki-MOH) is always having interruptions and micro-cuts ? No high load of the system, no swap, no hard disk r/w, mpg123 seems running well... nothing ! Except a little messa

[Asterisk-Users] MSNs don't work for me... :(

2005-09-19 Thread Yoann Le Bihan
Hi, My * server is running FreeBSD. The wonderful isdn4bsd with chan_capi port by hselaski works great, everything is perfect in a perfect world... but ! These [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSNs don't work at all ! My extensions.conf is very simple for my 5 MSNs (0353, 0416, 0618, 0619 and 0620) : [rnis-in]

[Asterisk-Users] Micro-cuts in MusicOnHold

2005-09-13 Thread Yoann Le Bihan
Hi ! :) I'm having trouble with my MusicOnHold... I'm using standard files (fpm-*.mp3), which are provided in * package (so I assume they're not variable bitrate encoded... anyway, I tried re-encoding them and no changes). The music is played, but with micro-cuts every 2/3 seconds... it's happenin

Re: [Asterisk-Users] DECT gateways

2005-08-17 Thread Yoann Le Bihan
2005/8/17, Michiel van Baak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Is there any other solution like this out there that works > with asterisk ? Why don't you use WiFi VoIP phones like ZyXEL 2000W (which is not such expensive compared with Cisco ones...) ? Best regards, YLB. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Iaxy Distinctive Ring

2005-08-17 Thread Yoann Le Bihan
2005/8/17, Andrès Tello Abrego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > A iaxy, is a CPE device that provides VOIP capabilities to normal phones, > using the iax protocol... > > So is a little hardware, for telephony usages, which doesn't have a lot of > features, and is't so cheap... Oooh... right... it's like a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Iaxy Distinctive Ring

2005-08-17 Thread Yoann Le Bihan
2005/8/17, Andrès Tello Abrego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I will answer you, the same somebody told me at IIRC. > > A watch has more processor power than a Iaxy... Uuuuh... well, I feel stupid but... what is the meaning of "laxy" ? 'cause... a watch... ;o))) sorry for my ignorance... Best regards,