RE: [asterisk-users] Digium h/w serial numbers

2007-04-24 Thread jacobso1
Hi, You most probably kept the invoice So contact digium. My experience was that they are human Regards, t. jacobson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trevor Peirce Sent: dimanche 22 avril 2007 19:58 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-C

Re:[asterisk-users] T1 cable for Digium T1/E1 Cards

2007-03-19 Thread jacobso1
cat5 cables are ok if you use straight cables. crossed cables are different as ethernet signals use other pin layout than e1. and beside the 'official' e1 crossed, there seems to be other layouts. this has been discussed here, so browse the archives. (my pc gives me headaches now, otherwise i would

Re:[asterisk-users] Looking for starting point?

2007-02-18 Thread jacobso1
hi, hi, i did wrote (assembler) programs for cp/m! if your experience is more on telephony', i think you will find trixbox easier. in one cd you will have a ready system. if your hardware is fully recognized, great ! do not use a too old machine nor a too new one. mind that the install will erase

Re: [asterisk-users] error dialing a SIP user. chan_sip.c:1994 create_addr: No such host

2007-02-03 Thread jacobso1
hi, i think the problem is here : exten => _321[0123],n,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}),30,to) | replace with exten => _321[0123],n,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN},30,to) note, i removed the parenthesis ')' after the {EXTEN} this should do regards, jacobson --- Scarlet ONE -

Re:[asterisk-users] CDR - uniqueid

2007-02-01 Thread jacobso1
hi, i think, by default, 'uniqueID' is created by the asterisk. if this is correct, you would (eventually) have non-uniqueID's i saw somewhere in the wiki that someone suggested a change (in the code ?) so that 'uniqueID' would be generated by the database. unique-id being the primary key and aut

RE: [asterisk-users] FXO module burn out !?

2006-08-02 Thread jacobso1
Hi, Try to swap both fxo modules. This way you will notice if the module is out or another problem is present. The tdm400 could be damaged or there is a configuration problem. Regards, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- Hello list, Howto be shure if one

RE: [asterisk-users] Load balenced (ADSL) network connections, is it possible?

2006-07-20 Thread jacobso1
Unless my brain did melt down under the high heat here, there are a few things I would share :   -  1 channel u-law uses at least 80k because of encapsulation So, think about compression -  You can never use 100% of a bandwidth. (80% is a good max) -  The values

RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?

2006-06-23 Thread jacobso1
If you do not have a budget, grandstream is not bad You do not get what you do not pay But you do not allways get what you paid for t. Jacobson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Victor Sent: vendredi 23 juin 2006 14:25 To: Asteri

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk server

2006-06-14 Thread jacobso1
Hi,   With 30 users and NO transcoding, that is certainly enough. Even if you use ‘real-time’ configuration (that requires a SQL server)   Now, if you system will be accessible both from inside (LAN) and outside (Internet), I would advice a second network card (10/100)   Regards,  

RE: [Asterisk-Users] OOH323 towards ciscogateway(2691)callsetupfailsat q931: Mandatory informationelement ismissing (96)

2005-12-08 Thread jacobso1
Dan, > I'd recommend reporting the problem along with a debug log and > traces from the router to: ooh323c-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > The developers have been quite responsive to problems I've had. Thank you for tips. I thing I must recompile the ooh323 module with 'make debug' then 'make ins

RE: [Asterisk-Users] OOH323 towards cisco gateway(2691)callsetupfails at q931: Mandatory information element ismissing (96)

2005-12-08 Thread jacobso1
1.2.0. Dan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jacobso1 Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 1:37 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] OOH323 towa

RE: [Asterisk-Users] OOH323 towards cisco gateway (2691) callsetupfails at q931: Mandatory information element is missing (96)

2005-12-08 Thread jacobso1
ago and the fixed it right away.   Dan   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jacobso1 Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 8:21 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] OOH323 towards cisco gateway (2691) call setupfails at q931: Mandatory

[Asterisk-Users] OOH323 towards cisco gateway (2691) call setup fails at q931: Mandatory information element is missing (96)

2005-12-08 Thread jacobso1
  Hi,   I am using ooh323. I cannot setup a call towards a cisco gateway. The cisco rejects the call right away with : Cause value: Mandatory information element is missing (96)     This is in the q931 part.   Cisco ‘explanation’ Indicates that the equipment that is sendi