Vinícius Fontes wrote:
There were some really unstable Asterisk releases in the 1.4 branch. I
personally use 1.4.13 or 1.4.15 in production. Every single time I tried
1.4.16 or higher I had problems.
Att
Vinícius Fontes
Desenvolvimento
Canall Tecnologia em Comunicações Ltda.
-
Benoit Plessis wrote:
lordfuknowsyou a écrit :
Vinícius Fontes wrote:
I use 1.4.18 with no problems. We have quite a few users(125 total
between branches), but the call volume at the most has been around 15
active calls at a time.
Any IAX2 phone or mostly SIP ?
Do you
Steve Totaro wrote:
I use 1.4.18 with no problems. We have quite a few users(125 total
between branches), but the call volume at the most has been around 15
active calls at a time.
I would classify that as Light to Medium Call Volume or SMB.
Let me clarify what I consider High
Gordon Henderson wrote:
Heres something that's making me scratch my head... I'm using RxFAX on
ISDN lines and in-general it's going well.
However, there seems to be a case when the fax doesn't get delivered, but
looking through the CDRs it seems that the call happened, RxFAX was
executed
Matt Riddell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Let's be more specific here, folks:
What version numbers?
Asterisk, spandsp, agx-addons / rx-tx-fax?
Asterisk: yesterday's 1.4 SVN
SpanDSP: tried with pre 15, 16 and 18
AGX-Addons: tried
Al lists wrote:
Has anyone checked asterisk with check_udp plug in?
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To
