We have probably 40 SPA2100/2102 that use T.38 to connect to a Cisco
gateway for fax. Once we get the settings right, it seems to work
probably 95% of the time. We had big issues with any of the 5.x
versions of software and have stayed on 3.3.6 on both the 2100 and 2102.
This isn't exactly
Nope, I gave up and haven't gone back. Not worth the hassle. We use
the SPA2100/SPA2102 and they work great for providing analog/fax lines
as they support T.38.
Olivier wrote:
>
> 2009/2/26 pe...@networkoblivion.com <mailto:pe...@networkoblivion.com>
> mailto:pe...
I used the Patton M-ATA a year or so ago and it was a piece of junk.
T.38 didn't work and there was no way to troubleshoot why it didn't
work. Also, the web interface was horrible.
Mike wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am looking for a good ATA recommendation, ideally something:
>
>
>
> 1) with o
> 1. Is it a technical reason that the ISP has restricted the upload to
> 512 Kbps or is it a Marketing reason that they have restricted the
> upload ?
Marketing most likely. If they have fiber in the building, it would be
a symmetric link. I have never seen a fiber connection that isn't the
s
Windows - http://kin.klever.net/pumpkin/binaries
Works great.
k4...@bellsouth.net wrote:
>
> I'm trying to do the same and have read the mentioned sites. The one
> item I can't seem to get past is a working TFTP server. What is the
> easiest method to get one running and what packages in Li
I'm using an FXS, but it is pretty much the same. What part do you
need? It is virtually the same as using a Cisco PRI card. Here is the
relevant part on the Cisco. On * you just set it up like a gateway.
dial-peer voice 200 voip
destination-pattern .T
progress_ind setup enable 3
sessi
You need a router with DSP modules for it to terminate voice, otherwise
it is just a data BRI and a router that has SIP. 1600's don't have them
and only the 1750-V/1751-V and 1760 support them on the 1700 series.
Pretty much every Cisco router from the 1600 and up supports a BRI
WIC/NM for dat
Is it causing an issue? There are lots of firewalls that do nat and
change the source port of packets to some random udp port. In my
experience, for outbound registrations, it generally doesn't cause an issue.
Robert Augustyn wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a strange problem, when I try to connect to le
