Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers from Queue Calls

2009-10-07 Thread Lenz Emilitri
A number of our clients has such issues. What we suggest for escalation is to do a blind transfer to a second-level queue, so that the logging is correct and even if second-line support cannot handle the call immediately, you get the functionality and the logging. Just my two euro cents, l.

[asterisk-users] Transfers from Queue Calls

2009-10-06 Thread Darrin Henshaw
Hello, I thought to post this here before my manager starts his own coding project to give us a workaround. My situation I'm running into is as follows: 1. A call comes into our Asterisk system, it's trunked from one office to another via IAX. 2. Call enters a queue and is picked up by one of

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers from Queue Calls

2009-10-06 Thread Kirill 'Big K' Katsnelson
On 091006 1249, Darrin Henshaw wrote: 1. A call comes into our Asterisk system, it's trunked from one office to another via IAX. 2. Call enters a queue and is picked up by one of the agents. 3. That agent has to transfer the call, could be for a number of reasons the client wanted someone in

[asterisk-users] Transfers on an inter-PBX PRI link

2009-03-16 Thread Vieri
Hi, I am trying to understand why some of my call transfers fail. My scenario is as follows: Legacy PBX1 ---PRI (EuroISDN) Zaptel--- Asterisk PBX2 Step1: PBX1 extension 101 calls PBX2 extension 102 Step2: PBX2 extension 102 answers the call and transfers it to PBX1 extension 103 Step3:

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on an inter-PBX PRI link

2009-03-16 Thread Steve Totaro
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Vieri rentor...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to understand why some of my call transfers fail. My scenario is as follows: Legacy PBX1 ---PRI (EuroISDN) Zaptel--- Asterisk PBX2 Step1: PBX1 extension 101 calls PBX2 extension 102 Step2: PBX2 extension

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin()

2008-09-07 Thread Doug Lytle
Mark Hamilton wrote: a) How can I make it so #2 doesn't have to be exceptionally fast, and maybe get a second of delay in there permitted? ;featuredigittimeout = 500 ; Max time (ms) between digits for ; feature activation (default is 500 ms) -- Ben

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin()

2008-09-06 Thread Mark Hamilton
call-limit=10Please helpThanks! Original Message Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin() From: "James Sneeringer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, September 05, 2008 10:57 pm To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" asterisk-users@list

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin()

2008-09-06 Thread Matt Riddell
] type=friend qualify=yes nat=yes host=dynamic dtmfmode=auto context=manila canreinvite=no callerid=Agent 1013 call-limit=10 Please help Thanks! Original Message Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin() From: James Sneeringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin()

2008-09-06 Thread Mark Hamilton
, 2008 9:08 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin() What do you get when you type show features? On 9/6/08, Mark Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi James, Thank you very much for a detailed reply. (Matt, sorry about

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin()

2008-09-05 Thread Mark Hamilton
] On Behalf Of Mark Hamilton Sent: August 31, 2008 4:15 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin() I've tried the regular, xfer button on xlite, dial 100 (to transfer to the queue), and hit go back to line 1 and hit xfer again

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin()

2008-09-05 Thread James Sneeringer
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin() What did you try and how did it fail? Are you using the t option in queue? ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin()

2008-08-31 Thread Mark Hamilton
-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin() What did you try and how did it fail? Are you using the t option in queue? On 8/30/08, Mark Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, no answers or is this thread going to remain unanswered too? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin()

2008-08-30 Thread Matt Riddell
6:15 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin() Oh, by the way, the agent who will be doing the assisted transfer will be using eyebeam. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin()

2008-08-29 Thread Mark Hamilton
So, no answers or is this thread going to remain unanswered too? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Hamilton Sent: August 28, 2008 6:15 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin

[asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin()

2008-08-28 Thread Mark Hamilton
Hi, I have the same question as: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2003-November/002320.html ..which like all important things was never answered. How do I do an assisted transfer on AgentLogin()? I don't use zaptel, it's just pure SIP/VoIP. Help please. Thanks,

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers on AgentLogin()

2008-08-28 Thread Mark Hamilton
Oh, by the way, the agent who will be doing the assisted transfer will be using eyebeam. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Hamilton Sent: August 28, 2008 5:54 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [asterisk-users] Transfers

[asterisk-users] transfers only work when voicemail enabled

2008-07-09 Thread Bart Coninckx
Hi all, when enabling blind and attended transfers in features.conf, these only seem to work when I enable voicemail for a particular user. How can this be? Can I have transferrring without voicemail? Using Asterisk 1.4 by the way. Thank you! Bart

Re: [asterisk-users] transfers only work when voicemail enabled

2008-07-09 Thread Mark Michelson
Bart Coninckx wrote: Hi all, when enabling blind and attended transfers in features.conf, these only seem to work when I enable voicemail for a particular user. How can this be? Can I have transferrring without voicemail? Using Asterisk 1.4 by the way. Thank you! Bart I think

Re: [asterisk-users] transfers only work when voicemail enabled

2008-07-09 Thread Bart Coninckx
Hi all, when enabling blind and attended transfers in features.conf, these only seem to work when I enable voicemail for a particular user. How can this be? Can I have transferrring without voicemail? Using Asterisk 1.4 by the way. Thank you! Bart I think some clarification

[asterisk-users] Transfers with TE12xp

2008-06-16 Thread voip crazy
Hello all, I have an asterisk PBX working perfectly, and the transfers between extensions, works ok. The problem, when I receive a call from the line connected to the TE12Xp, and I try to transfer it, the calls hangs up. I have other analog lines and I can tranfer all the without problems. I've

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers with TE12xp

2008-06-16 Thread voip crazy
More info about the problem. This occurs, when I try to transfer using the *2 funcionality into aterisk Thanks 2008/6/16 voip crazy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello all, I have an asterisk PBX working perfectly, and the transfers between extensions, works ok. The problem, when I receive a call

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers with TE12xp

2008-06-16 Thread Steve Totaro
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:39 AM, voip crazy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I have an asterisk PBX working perfectly, and the transfers between extensions, works ok. The problem, when I receive a call from the line connected to the TE12Xp, and I try to transfer it, the calls hangs up. I

[asterisk-users] transfers and CDR

2007-03-08 Thread Rodrigo Gonzalez
Hi everybody, A question, how do I follow a call that is transferred? is the any event or something in the CDR that would let me find all the call sequence? Thanks Rodrigo ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-27 Thread Martin Schrott - Thinking-Systems
Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 4:32 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh I get round this bug by replacing: exten = X,1,Dial(sip/blah) with: exten = X,1

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-26 Thread Mike Dawson
I get round this bug by replacing: exten = X,1,Dial(sip/blah) with: exten = X,1,Answer exten = X,n,Dial(sip/blah) It means the call is in an answered state before it starts ringing but it doesn't seem to cause any major problems. Mike Martin Schrott - Thinking-Systems wrote: Hi all, I

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-25 Thread Martin Schrott - Thinking-Systems
Hi all, I cannot exactly reproduce your problems, but I can tell you, what problem we have on this topic: a calles b. b takes the call and can speak to a. b sets up a attendend transfer (via the softkey configured in asterisk) to c and hears ringing. a hears music on hold. b hears ringing if c

[asterisk-users] transfers from an E1 using 2b-channel or similar anyone? (QSIG?)

2006-07-25 Thread Manrique Feoli
Hi all, Here is the situation: A call comes in to an Alcatel PBX and it sends it to an E1 on * , this * either sends the call to a VoIP extension or needs to forward it to an extension back on the Alcatel, but WITHOUT using another slot of the E1 (no tromboning or hairpinning). I've

Re: [asterisk-users] transfers from an E1 using 2b-channel or similar anyone? (QSIG?)

2006-07-25 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
On Jul 25, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Manrique Feoli wrote: Hi all, Here is the situation: A call comes in to an Alcatel PBX and it sends it to an E1 on * , this * either sends the call to a VoIP extension or needs to forward it to an extension back on the Alcatel, but WITHOUT using another slot

Re: [asterisk-users] transfers from an E1 using 2b-channel or similar anyone? (QSIG?)

2006-07-25 Thread Manrique Feoli
Hi Matt, thanks for your answer, I guess it is still as you said a while back that you did it using 5ESS Can you share how you did in 5ESS? (a sample of the extensions.conf ) and what kind of switch you were connected to? I'm not sure if the Alcatel 4400 and the Nortel Meridian 11

[asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
I don't know why, but when doing transfers between Polycom phones, once the transferring party hits transfer a second time, to be removed from the call, User A no longer hears music on hold, or a ring back. Scenario. 1. User A dials User B. 2. User A and User B are connected. 3. User B

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Doug Lytle
Douglas Garstang wrote: 1. User A dials User B. 2. User A and User B are connected. 3. User B hits the transfer soft key. User A gets music on hold. 4. User B dials user C. User C's phone rings, and user A continues to hear music on hold. 5. When User B presses the transfer soft key again to

RE: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Doug Lytle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 9:34 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh Douglas Garstang wrote: 1. User A dials User B. 2. User

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Doug Lytle
Douglas Garstang wrote: -Original Message- And that's normal, for user A to just hear dead air? I have a Polycom IP501 sitting on my desk (Test phone): I call it with my Avaya phone pick up the ringing extension press transfer button (I hear hold music on the

RE: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Doug Lytle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 11:48 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh Douglas Garstang wrote: -Original Message

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Doug Lytle
Douglas Garstang wrote: I don't know... all I know is that when user C starts to ring, and user B has dropped from the call, the music on hold stops for user A, until user C answers. I would have expected User A to hear ringing at this point. Then they need to do a blind transfer.

RE: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Doug Lytle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 12:14 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh Douglas Garstang wrote: I don't know... all I know

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Doug Lytle
Douglas Garstang wrote: -Original Message- From: Doug Lytle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 12:14 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh Doug, The transfer soft button can

RE: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Doug Lytle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 11:48 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh Douglas Garstang wrote: -Original Message

RE: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Doug Lytle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 12:56 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh Douglas Garstang wrote: -Original Message- From

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Doug Lytle
Douglas Garstang wrote: passes at all? I don't think this is the same scenario. When you transfer to an Asterisk extension, ie voicemail, your not going to get a period of ring back as Asterisk will answer the call immediately. In this example, I'm dialing to another extension on

RE: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Doug Lytle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 1:35 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh Douglas Garstang wrote: passes at all? I don't

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Doug Lytle
Douglas Garstang wrote: People (Users that is) seem to think, pressing less is better. Doug, as it turns out, the transfer button on the polycom and the transfer soft button, both behave in exactly the same way. What firmware? I'm running Bootrom 3.1.3, sip.ld 1.5.2 Doug -- Ben

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Doug Lytle
Douglas Garstang wrote: -Original Message- When the extension on your desk is ringing, after you have pressed transfer key a second time(soft or hard key), does the original caller still hear music on hold, or ringback or nothing? Following your example, pressing transfer

RE: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Doug Lytle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 2:15 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh Douglas Garstang wrote: -Original Message

Re: [asterisk-users] Transfers - No ringback or moh

2006-07-24 Thread Nathan Bowyer
On 7/24/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Douglas Garstang wrote: -Original Message- When the extension on your desk is ringing, after you have pressed transfer key a second time(soft or hard key), does the original caller still hear music on hold, or ringback or

[Asterisk-Users] transfers/parked calls + polycom 501

2006-03-13 Thread sdgesa gaeharth
I am trying to get parked calls/transfers working on our polycom 501s + asterisk.The transer button on the polycom phone does not seem to transfer/park the call properly. I have to use the # - 700 to park the call.Furthermore the # - 700 only works on incomming calls. If I dial out then

[Asterisk-Users] transfers using # in asterisk

2005-12-29 Thread Franklin Webb
Greetings fellow list members, I am using ABE and I am attempting to impliment transfers using "#". I am using both "T" and "t" as options in my Dial() command. I am attempting to hit "#" then enter another extension from my dialplan. I have tried this on both ends of the conversation and

Re: [Asterisk-Users] transfers using # in asterisk

2005-12-29 Thread pdhales
Any idea what version of Asterisk ABE is based on? PaulH - Original Message - From: Franklin Webb To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 8:43 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] transfers using # in asterisk Greetings fellow list

Re: [Asterisk-Users] transfers using # in asterisk

2005-12-29 Thread trixter aka Bret McDanel
On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 16:43 -0500, Franklin Webb wrote: Greetings fellow list members, I am using ABE and I am attempting to impliment transfers using #. I am using both T and t as options in my Dial() command. I am attempting to hit # then enter another extension from my dialplan. I

[Asterisk-Users] transfers from Polycom 501 involving Sipura 300 and asterisk 1.2

2005-12-05 Thread C F
When transferring a call that came in on the Sipura and picked up by a Polycom 501 (sip 1.52), then transferred to another polycom using the transfer button on the polycom (havn't tried with the blind transfer from the polycom phone), then as soon as the transfer is complete (after pressing

[Asterisk-Users] Transfers on PRI connected channel banks and legacy PBX's

2005-06-14 Thread Steve Hanselman
Hi, Were using our legacy PBX as a channel bank with asterisk sitting between the pbx and our telco provider spliced by a TE410P. If it were a straight analog FXS card then wed use a hook flash to break into asterisk for transfers etc, does anybody know what the equivalent is for the

[Asterisk-Users] # Transfers

2005-05-31 Thread David Gomillion
I am currently running stable, CVS-v1-0-05/25/05-12:07:15, with Polycom SIP phones, running 1.4.1. Too many of our transfers using the Transfer end up with zombie channels after a REFER. As such, I implemented # transfers, and all is well. Sort of. I have a reproducible issue. Take a call from

Re: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers

2005-05-31 Thread Matthew Boehm
David, Check out bug number 4375. Does this relate? 4375 is plaquing us like mad and if I can find more people that get this too then it might move up in priority. -Matthew David Gomillion wrote: I am currently running stable, CVS-v1-0-05/25/05-12:07:15, with Polycom SIP phones, running

[Asterisk-Users] Transfers tend to fail after upgrade to 1.0.7

2005-04-25 Thread Pablo Alsina
Hi We have a fairly simple Asterisk setup: E1 card, 8 FXO lines connected to old PBX, and some SIP phones, used by a callcenter with queues. Almost all calls are incoming (through E1 line), answered by some callcenter operator (using SIP phones, call assigned by queue app), and in some cases, are

[Asterisk-Users] Transfers fails, even after upgrade to 1.0.7

2005-04-24 Thread Pablo Alsina
Hi We have a fairly simple Asterisk setup: E1 card, 8 FXO lines connected to old PBX, and some SIP phones, used by a callcenter with queues. Almost all calls are incoming (through E1 line), answered by some callcenter operator (using SIP phones, call assigned by queue app), and in some cases, are

[Asterisk-Users] Transfers to engaged extensions

2005-02-11 Thread Robie Basak
Hi, I'm using zaptel with three way calling and call transfers with a hookflash. If I try transfering a call to an extension that is engaged I get an engaged tone. This is fine, but how do I get back to the caller? If I hookflash again I seem to put on a three-way call and the caller can hear

RE: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers.

2005-01-21 Thread Ben Merrills
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Kou Sent: 21 January 2005 02:02 To: Asterisk List; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers. No, it's doesn't work. Asterisk List on 2005/1/21 01:48 wrote

RE: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers.

2005-01-21 Thread Chris Blunt
@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers. I justed edited the Wiki Asterisk config file features.conf for this attended transfer features. Please check Wiki again for details. Best regards, --JJL44 On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:04:40 -0800 (PST), Bruce Komito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers.

2005-01-20 Thread Robert Spielmann
Am Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2005 19:18 schrieb Asterisk List: The current CVS HEAD version already has ## transfer built-in. See the included configs/features.conf.sample file. You can define your own transfer key sequence. There is also an attended transfer feature. What is an attended

Re: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers.

2005-01-20 Thread Asterisk List
Attended transfer, also called supervised transfer, works like this: While on conversation with another party, you dial ** the transfer key sequence. Asterisk says Transfer then gives you a dial tone, while put the other party on hold music. You dial the transferee number and talk with the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers.

2005-01-20 Thread Bruce Komito
Sorry if I missed the beginning of this thread, but I've never heard of the ** transfer key sequence, nor have I found a way to make it work. Would you mind, please explaining this further or pointing me to somewhere where it's documented? (I checked Wiki and Google but no joy.) Thanks Bruce

RE: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers.

2005-01-20 Thread Brian West
features.conf bkw -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Komito Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 11:05 AM To: Asterisk List Cc: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers. Sorry if I

Re: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers.

2005-01-20 Thread Asterisk List
I justed edited the Wiki Asterisk config file features.conf for this attended transfer features. Please check Wiki again for details. Best regards, --JJL44 On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:04:40 -0800 (PST), Bruce Komito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry if I missed the beginning of this thread, but

RE: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers.

2005-01-20 Thread Ben Merrills
Does this work with app_queue/chan_agent? Cheers, Ben -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Asterisk List Sent: 20 January 2005 17:28 To: Bruce Komito Cc: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers. I justed

Re: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers.

2005-01-20 Thread Asterisk List
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Asterisk List Sent: 20 January 2005 17:28 To: Bruce Komito Cc: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers. I justed edited the Wiki Asterisk config file features.conf for this attended transfer features. Please check Wiki

Re: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers.

2005-01-20 Thread Jim Kou
No, it's doesn't work. Asterisk List on 2005/1/21 01:48 wrote: I have no idea if atxfer works with app_queue/chan_agent. Can anyone try it? Best regards, --JJL44 On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:38:25 -, Ben Merrills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does this work with app_queue/chan_agent? Cheers, Ben --

Re: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers.

2005-01-19 Thread Asterisk List
The current CVS HEAD version already has ## transfer built-in. See the included configs/features.conf.sample file. You can define your own transfer key sequence. There is also an attended transfer feature. features.conf file: [featuremap] blindxfer = ## atxfer = ** This worked very well for

[Asterisk-Users] # Transfers.

2005-01-18 Thread Ronald Hartmann
So I have read and read and read... google is my friend and the wiki is by brother... However, I am still unclear on what the preferred method of using the pound sign is. If the Pound sign is set aside for Transfer.. Then when I make an outbound call to my bank I can not Enter my PIN followed by

Re: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers.

2005-01-18 Thread Craig Guy
-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 1:32 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] # Transfers. So I have read and read and read... google is my friend and the wiki is by brother... However, I am still unclear on what the preferred method of using the pound sign is. If the Pound sign

[Asterisk-Users] transfers with zap channel

2005-01-17 Thread Paul Fielding
Ok, I've seen discussion before on doing transfers (attended and unattended), there seems to be much confusion over it. As things sit, I've been trying (unsuccessfully) to do transfers with a zap channel (analog phone attached to TDM400). I have no idea what I'm missing. My current

Re: [Asterisk-Users] transfers with zap channel

2005-01-17 Thread Lyle Giese
- Original Message - From: Paul Fielding To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 6:12 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] transfers with zap channel Ok, I've seen discussion before on doing transfers (attended

Re: [Asterisk-Users] transfers with zap channel

2005-01-17 Thread Paul Fielding
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] transfers with zap channel How long between getting parked is the orginal call dropping? Depending on your dialplan, yes dialing 700x will almost immediately send the call to call parking. (IMHO, poor extension planning can also cause

Re: [Asterisk-Users] transfers with zap channel

2005-01-17 Thread Lyle Giese
Have you looked at features.conf? Lyle - Original Message - From: Paul Fielding To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 8:53 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] transfers with zap channel The outside line

Re: [Asterisk-Users] transfers with zap channel

2005-01-17 Thread Paul Fielding
List - Non-Commercial Discussion Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 8:20 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] transfers with zap channel Have you looked at features.conf? Lyle - Original Message - From: Paul Fielding To: Asterisk Users Mailing List

[Asterisk-Users] Transfers- Please Help ASAP

2004-07-30 Thread AJ Grinnell
Can someone please help with this. After an outside caller has been parked, they inherit our abilitites to transfer. I have played with all the different combinations of T and t, but nothing seems to work. I found a way to get my Sipura to work with a flash transfer. So right now I am stuck. Is

[Asterisk-Users] Transfers (sip or asterisk #' base) broken in certain scenario

2004-07-12 Thread Chris A. Icide
I've got an interesting scenario where transfers while getting an invite seem to break. Here is the scenario: You have a receptionist who has a 6 line phone (in this case, a polycom ip600 - also tested with a Cisco 7960) the receptionist has all six lines available for use (in the case of the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Transfers on the Cisco 7960

2003-07-10 Thread Ryan Butler
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 10:26, Kim C. Callis wrote: I noticed that there is a soft button for transfer when you initiate a call. I pressed it, and it actually put the call on hold, although I was able to call another extension. Is that soft button functional? And if so, how do you make use of

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Transfers on the Cisco 7960

2003-07-10 Thread Mark Spencer
We support both blind and supervised transfers on the Cisco. Mark On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Kim C. Callis wrote: I noticed that there is a soft button for transfer when you initiate a call. I pressed it, and it actually put the call on hold, although I was able to call another extension. Is that

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Transfers on the Cisco 7960

2003-07-10 Thread marrandy
On Thursday 10 July 2003 03:24 pm, Mark Spencer wrote: We support both blind and supervised transfers on the Cisco. Mark On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Kim C. Callis wrote: I noticed that there is a soft button for transfer when you initiate a call. I pressed it, and it actually put the call on