Re: [Asterisk-Users] 2 Linphones communicating through Asterisk? Solved! Thanks Jon!

2004-03-04 Thread Thomas Sparr
Hope that helps > > Jnn > > - Original Message - > From: "Thomas Sparr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 1:46 PM > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] 2 Linphones communicating through Asterisk? &

Re: [Asterisk-Users] 2 Linphones communicating through Asterisk?

2004-03-04 Thread Maxime R
Both are allowed but for readability => is used on objects. Maxime - Original Message - From: "Tor Houghton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 10:19 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 2 Linphones communicating through Ast

Re: [Asterisk-Users] 2 Linphones communicating through Asterisk?

2004-03-04 Thread Tor Houghton
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:06:52PM -, Jon Shamash wrote: > > [snip] > > it should be > exten = 66,1,Dial(SIP/66) > Incidentally, is there a difference between => and =, or are both allowed? Tor ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ht

Re: [Asterisk-Users] 2 Linphones communicating through Asterisk?

2004-03-04 Thread Jon Shamash
Hope that helps Jnn - Original Message - From: "Thomas Sparr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 1:46 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] 2 Linphones communicating through Asterisk? > Hi all, > > I'm experimentin

[Asterisk-Users] 2 Linphones communicating through Asterisk?

2004-03-04 Thread Thomas Sparr
Hi all, I'm experimenting with the following setup: An Asterisk server at 192.168.0.10. 2 Linphones at 192.168.0.60 and 192.168.0.66. The Linphones register themselves at the Asterisk as sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If my understanding is correct they should be available on the