On Monday 07 June 2021 at 14:06:55, Sean Bright wrote:
> On 6/7/2021 6:59 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
> > It makes no sense to me that Asterisk is even considering ADSI (where A
> > stands for Analogue) on a SIP call. How can I disable this so that the
> > error does not occur?
>
> Don't load the re
On 6/7/2021 6:59 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
> It makes no sense to me that Asterisk is even considering ADSI (where A stands
> for Analogue) on a SIP call. How can I disable this so that the error does
> not occur?
Don't load the res_adsi.so module. You can add the following to
modules.conf:
n
Hi.
Can anyone give me some insight into how to deal with this failure mode?
It makes no sense to me that Asterisk is even considering ADSI (where A stands
for Analogue) on a SIP call. How can I disable this so that the error does
not occur?
On Friday 19 March 2021 at 11:17:36, Antony Stone w
On Thursday 18 March 2021 at 18:07:54, Antony Stone wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm running Asterisk 13 and Asterisk 16 using SIP trunks only (to a
> commercial trunking provider). I have no analogue interfaces.
>
> A user reported dialling in to voicemail (the standard Asterisk Comedian
> Mail service) f
Hi.
I'm running Asterisk 13 and Asterisk 16 using SIP trunks only (to a commercial
trunking provider). I have no analogue interfaces.
A user reported dialling in to voicemail (the standard Asterisk Comedian Mail
service) from a mobile phone and being unable to select the menu options.
The cal
Hello,
I know this is an out of date technology, but I have a need to use
it to reprogram some old phones.
I have managed to get Asterisk and a Digium board to upload scripts
to the phones using the asterisk.adsi example, but trying to make my own
scripts based on the example file is
Can anyone tell me the proper ADSI syntax for prompting a user to enter
their password or an extension?
--
Shay Smith
Gmail Evangelist
David Douglas School District
503-261-8235
http://www.ddouglas.k12.or.us
Sent from Portland, OR, United States
___
-
While at this subject I would like to post this question regarding ADSI.
If I use a channel bank (like the Adit 600) with a digium T1/E1 card
connected to asterisk, can I still get to use ADSI phones? with all
the fun stuff?
If the answer is yes, if I go ahead and configure the Adit 600 to use
a CM
>I would be curious about what other members of this list think about
>the best practices for giving clients functionality on their desk
>phones.
See, I have a dirty little secret. One of the primary justifications that is
used for VoIP PBX is consolidated physical network - I mean, it's supposed
t
On 10/5/05, Don Pobanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Bosch wrote:
> > Since Colin Anderson -- in a previous thread -- asked the question about
> > whether ADSI was dead, I thought it was worth discussing.
> >
> >
> > Does anybody else have anything to add?
> >
> > -Stephen-
>
> I hope ADSI i
Stephen Bosch wrote:
Since Colin Anderson -- in a previous thread -- asked the question about
whether ADSI was dead, I thought it was worth discussing.
Does anybody else have anything to add?
-Stephen-
I hope ADSI is not dead! We have 100 Aastra 390 ADSI phones with 20 of
them in service.
Since Colin Anderson -- in a previous thread -- asked the question about
whether ADSI was dead, I thought it was worth discussing.
We've been using Nortel Vista 350s in our office up until now. The
phones are from Telus, I don't know if there's any way to unlock them.
It would appear Telus hasn't
Hi,
Does anybody knows if ADSI could be used from the SIP channel?
Alejandro
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lis
Anyone know how to get this to work? Does Asterisk support
it.
If not I am willing to post a bounty to get it to work.
Anyone interested please email me direct.
Thanks
John Bittner
Simlab.net
973-239-8548
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-User
-users-
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jimmy
|Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 10:43 AM
|To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
|Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI Input from 480 keypad?
|
|Sorry it this is a reposting, but I got no replies last time, and
wanted to
|make sure that the post went through.
Anyone know any asterisk compatible ADSI phones available for sale in
the UK?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.
Sorry it this is a reposting, but I got no replies last time, and wanted to
make sure that the post went through.
Setup:
Asterisk 1.0.5
Aastra 480 analog ADSI phone
Is it possible to program a Aastra 480 phone to accept input from the
keypad in response to a screen prompt?
For example, the scre
Setup:
Asterisk 1.0.5
Aastra 480 analog ADSI phone
Is it possible to program a Aastra 480 phone to accept input from the
keypad in response to a screen prompt?
For example, the screen says
Enter Password
And Press Ok
I can make the text appear, I can create a softkey that says "Ok", I
can get a
Program your locked ADSI phone not by unlocking it but by using the
feature slot FDN download descriptors of ADSI SEC security code telco
provider lock number key from database list. ch33s3
First reset phone. Set clock to Jan 1 12:00AM (options-2?). exit to
main screen. press options, (mute/fla
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Matt Gibson wrote:
> > Any suggestions welcome.
>
> Do you have the proper FDN/SEC codes for your phone located in
> asterisk.adsi, and have an extension created to program your phone?
Not 100% sure. I've tried all the codes I could find - including those in
the document I
Chris W wrote:
Any suggestions welcome.
Do you have the proper FDN/SEC codes for your phone located in
asterisk.adsi, and have an extension created to program your phone?
Matt
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/ma
My set up is quite simple: Redhat 9, Asterisk CV-HEAD from
07/11/04-13:04:22; TDM400P card, FXO card (X101P now unused) and a Fritz!
AVM pci ISDN card.
It works.
But...just got an adsi PT390 phone and with some help from the nice people
at Sayson got some basic programming into it. The program
nuele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 8:09 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI questions for a 390 ADSI Phone
>>
>>
>
IFEVENT IDLE THEN
> CLEAR
> SHOWDISPLAY "titles" AT 1
> SHOWKEYS "sd_1"
> ENDIF
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rob Emanuele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion&q
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI questions for a 390 ADSI Phone
OK, so I've programmed the default adsi script into slots 1 and 2.
Comedian took up slot 3.
Comedian now works properly
o back to it's default
> screen until the programming is triggered again.
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Matt Gibson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent:
Gibson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: SPAM: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI questions for a 390 ADSI Phone
Rob Emanuele wrote:
So load asterisk into Sl
Rob Emanuele wrote:
So load asterisk into Slot 1 & 2 and put Commedian in slot 3? Sounds easy
enough. Does that amke voicemail notification work too?
Where did you guys get the codes for slot 3? I have the FDN/SEC codes
for Slot 4, but have not been able to find the codes for 1,2,3.
I've talk
So load asterisk into Slot 1 & 2 and put Commedian in slot 3? Sounds easy
enough. Does that amke voicemail notification work too?
This does seem moderately hokey to have to load it into both slots. I'll
try that shortly with the 2 AdsiProg example you've get below. Is there a
long answer? If
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 15:40, Rob Emanuele wrote:
> I got a 390 Adsi phone (unlocked) hooked to my wct400. It seems too work
> pretty well. I'm having two little problems with it.
>
> 1) The idle title screen will not show up unless I manually press service
> and select "Asterix PBX". What seems
I got a 390 Adsi phone (unlocked) hooked to my wct400. It seems too work
pretty well. I'm having two little problems with it.
1) The idle title screen will not show up unless I manually press service
and select "Asterix PBX". What seems odd is that if I do not manually
select it it follows the
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 17:09, Martin Keding wrote:
> I have some Sayson / Aastra 480e ADSI phones. They work great except for one
> annoying feature. It's not really the phone, it's the ADSI programming
> feature in Asterisk. I can't figure out how to recreate the factor default
> "flash" screen key
I have some Sayson / Aastra 480e ADSI phones. They work great except for one
annoying feature. It's not really the phone, it's the ADSI programming
feature in Asterisk. I can't figure out how to recreate the factor default
"flash" screen key on the phone. When I create a ADSI script, it loads to
th
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ariel Batista
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI slow?
Alfred R. Nurnberger wrote:
> The procedure you described is the reset procedure.
> If the phone is locked then thi
> The procedure you described is the reset procedure.
> If the phone is locked then this will not work.
Funny, It cleared out Bell's application which was unable to be erased any
other way... I am positive that the procedure works for locked phones.
Regards,
Andrew
_
pe this helps.
>
> -Alfred
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew
> Kohlsmith
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI slow?
>
>
>> If
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew
Kohlsmith
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI slow?
> If you bought cheap phones of ebay you might be out of luck though - if
> they are provider locked then there is no
right now! :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alfred R.
Nurnberger
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 10:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI slow?
ADSI is a slow inband protocol.
You will notice that when pressing
> If you bought cheap phones of ebay you might be out of luck though - if
> they are provider locked then there is no way to program them without
> knowing the provider specific password (according to Sayson)
PT390s are easy to unlock (and the 490s I think are very similar, I have one
of each) --
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of DUSTIN WILDES
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 6:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI slow?
I currently received two of the sayson 390 & 480 phones. I like the style
of the phones, but was wan
I currently received two of the sayson 390 & 480 phones. I like the style of the
phones, but was wanting some feedback from other users.
My phones seem incredibly slow whenever connecting to voicemail. I've added the
security settings to my adsi.conf file & re-downloaded the script to the phone
We are interested in deploying some ADSI phones, but we are currently
using Sipura SPA-2000s. Everything I read on ADSI, says that it is
just audio, and you don't need a special channel bank or anything like
that.
But what about through the SPA? I notice that zapata.conf appears to
have an optio
on Pounder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 5:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI ports
>
>
>> > Are their any options for ADSI capitable ports in denisties of 20 to
>> 50
>> > po
February 18, 2004 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI ports
> > Are their any options for ADSI capitable ports in denisties of 20 to 50
> > ports that will work with asterisk and ADSI phones.
>
>
>
> 2 t1 ports and a 48port channel bank
> ___
> Are their any options for ADSI capitable ports in denisties of 20 to 50
> ports that will work with asterisk and ADSI phones.
2 t1 ports and a 48port channel bank
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listi
Are their any options for ADSI capitable ports
in denisties of 20 to 50 ports that will work with asterisk and ADSI
phones.
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 14:10, Ken Alker wrote:
> --On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 5:54 AM -0600 Steven Critchfield
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 03:00, Ken Alker wrote:
> >> --On Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:28 PM -0500 Andrew Kohlsmith
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
--On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 5:54 AM -0600 Steven Critchfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 03:00, Ken Alker wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:28 PM -0500 Andrew Kohlsmith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I thought you were wrong here, as I have Vista 390 at home an
> It made it to the US. The problem was cost. No one is willing to spend
> that much money for a phone
USWest/Qwest sells ADSI (and a phone) as part of their multi-line 'home
receptionist' service, I believe.
--Justin
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[E
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 03:00, Ken Alker wrote:
> --On Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:28 PM -0500 Andrew Kohlsmith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
> > I thought you were wrong here, as I have Vista 390 at home and I was
sure
> > that wasn't the case. Lo and behold one of the biggest reasons fo
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 03:00, Ken Alker wrote:
> --On Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:28 PM -0500 Andrew Kohlsmith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
> > I thought you were wrong here, as I have Vista 390 at home and I was sure
> > that wasn't the case. Lo and behold one of the biggest reasons fo
--On Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:28 PM -0500 Andrew Kohlsmith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
I thought you were wrong here, as I have Vista 390 at home and I was sure
that wasn't the case. Lo and behold one of the biggest reasons for my
wanting to go ADSI over IP has been shattered.
[...]
May
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Steven Critchfield
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
>
[...]
> > You need to
> If I read above correctly, you imply that ADSI phones don't need
> wall-warts (A/C power transformers that plug into the wall). I'd assume
> that based on the sizable LCD screen, potential back-lighting,
> microcontroller(s), etc, that an ADSI phone would have to have a
> wall-wart, especially i
> > Do ADSI phones need wall-warts, or can they drive themselves from the
> > line power?
> You can get dial tone on ADSI w/o a wall-wart, just like a
> regular analog phone. But you need a wall-wart to give you
> power for the screen and ADSI functionality, at least on the
> Nortel Vista 350. S
--On Monday, January 19, 2004 11:01 AM -0500 Andrew Kohlsmith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IP phones are nice, I'll give them that... but they are also a pain in
the ass if you're upgrading/retrofiting an office, and they also don't
play well together -- you're more or less stuck using one bran
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 10:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PJ
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 5:09 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Ast
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PJ
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 5:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, David Gomillion
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Ted Cabeen waxed:
> Andrew Kohlsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet infrastructure putting
> >> the IP phones inline between the wall jack and the PC? There are a
> >> number of IP phones that have builtin switch/hub that
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Ray Burkholder
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 7:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone (and
> proper implementation the
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:08:33PM -0800, PJ said:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, David Gomillion wrote:
>
> > Andrew wrote:
> >
> > First, what's wrong with PoE? Is it any worse than installing tons of
> > channel banks?
>
> Can anybody recommend a good PoE product? I am interested in getting
> that
> > Probably because it's well known that these setups are prone to failure
> > of either the PC's connection, the phone's connection, or degredation of
> > one/both. It also breaks switch envirenments where spanning-tree
> > portfast is enabled (not as big of a deal if the deployment is in
> > co
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, David Gomillion wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
>
> First, what's wrong with PoE? Is it any worse than installing tons of
> channel banks?
Can anybody recommend a good PoE product? I am interested in getting
that implemented.
PJ
--
Wisdom is not a product of schooling but the li
> Aastra will have a production PT480i SIP phone in March for ~US180-$200.
> Same phone as ADSI model just SIP, but has 4 extra buttons for virtual
> lines. Got a beta SIP model under test. Designed for SIP v1 & v2. * is
> one of PBX used for testing by development, so should be * friendly when
problems. What did you experience?
- Dustin -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dustin Goodwin
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
Why
mmercial Sales Engineer
http://www.amatechtel.com
(806) 722-2227
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
Why wouldn't you just use you
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet
> > infrastructure putting
> > the IP phones inline between the wall jack and the PC? There are a
> > number of IP phones that have builtin switch/hub that allows
> > the PC to
> > daisy chain off the IP phone.
>
EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > Dustin Goodwin
> > Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:18 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone
Andrew Kohlsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet infrastructure putting
>> the IP phones inline between the wall jack and the PC? There are a
>> number of IP phones that have builtin switch/hub that allows the PC to
>> daisy chain off the IP phone.
Andrew wrote:
> > Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet infrastructure putting
> > the IP phones inline between the wall jack and the PC? There are a
> > number of IP phones that have builtin switch/hub that allows the PC to
> > daisy chain off the IP phone.
>
> To quote myself:
>
> >>
echtel.com
(806) 722-2227
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 12:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
>
> > Why wouldn't you just use your e
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Dustin Goodwin
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:18 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
>
>
> Why wouldn't
nday, January 19, 2004 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
I'm looking at ADSI phones simply because I don't have to re-tool my
entire
building; I can use the existing phone network and (I think) get all the
functionality I need with the (far) cheaper ADSI p
> It was my impression that these phones had 10MB ehternet connections and not
> 100MB. Not that most of us would notice the difference in browsing the net,
> it does defeat the purpose of having 100MB switches. (I believe I also saw
> people on this list talking about strange things happening whe
> It was my impression that these phones had 10MB ehternet connections and not
> 100MB. Not that most of us would notice the difference in browsing the net,
> it does defeat the purpose of having 100MB switches. (I believe I also saw
> people on this list talking about strange things happening when
> Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet infrastructure putting
> the IP phones inline between the wall jack and the PC? There are a
> number of IP phones that have builtin switch/hub that allows the PC to
> daisy chain off the IP phone.
To quote myself:
>> True, but I don't have to re
- Original Message -
From: "Dustin Goodwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
> >
> > I'm looking at ADSI phones simply because I don't h
Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet infrastructure putting
the IP phones inline between the wall jack and the PC? There are a
number of IP phones that have builtin switch/hub that allows the PC to
daisy chain off the IP phone.
- Dustin -
I'm looking at ADSI phones simply because
> Pretty much no. The ADSI specification was crippled from the start to
> specificly not compete with PBX offerings. It has one advantage of
> (very limited) programmability, but a phone like the SNOM has an
> open-source core. It also has the dubious value of being interchangeable
> with a reg
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Ulexus waxed:
> On Sunday, 18 January, 2004 02:04, Ken Alker wrote:
> > Assuming the price of an ADSI screen phone (say, Aastra 390) was the same
> > as an IP screen phone (say, Cisco 7960) and someone was setting up an *
> > server for their 20 employees (each of whom would h
On Sunday, 18 January, 2004 02:04, Ken Alker wrote:
> Assuming the price of an ADSI screen phone (say, Aastra 390) was the same
> as an IP screen phone (say, Cisco 7960) and someone was setting up an *
> server for their 20 employees (each of whom would have either an ADSI or IP
> phone on their de
Assuming the price of an ADSI screen phone (say, Aastra 390) was the same
as an IP screen phone (say, Cisco 7960) and someone was setting up an *
server for their 20 employees (each of whom would have either an ADSI or IP
phone on their desk), would there be advantages to using the ADSI phones
- Original Message -
From: "C. Maj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI. used beyond own phone network?
> > What kind of security implications would this have?
>
> Probab
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Andrew Thompson waxed:
> I am curious. I understand that features can be pushed to an ADSI phone that
> make navigating your own voicemail easier, and for other internal things.
> But, does anyone push this data outside of their own phone network?
>
> Example: I am at home wi
I am curious. I understand that features can be pushed to an ADSI phone that
make navigating your own voicemail easier, and for other internal things.
But, does anyone push this data outside of their own phone network?
Example: I am at home with my spiffy new ADSI compatible handset and dial up
my
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Lee Redmayne waxed:
> Hi All
>
> If I want to get my ADSI Phones (successfully connected off a Rhino Channel
> Bank and TE410P) to connect to Asterisk to get their config downloaded, is
> there something specific needed in extensions.conf for them to dial to get
> this?
>
>
Hi All
If I want to get my ADSI Phones (successfully connected off a Rhino Channel
Bank and TE410P) to connect to Asterisk to get their config downloaded, is
there something specific needed in extensions.conf for them to dial to get
this?
Thanks :)
__
, November 25, 2003 2:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI Programming - Found Guide on
Designing Apps
Book costs $49.50
PDF Download - free
--- Jonathan Biggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Found some info on the Web that may help some
> of the ADSI progra
Book costs $49.50
PDF Download - free
--- Jonathan Biggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Found some info on the Web that may help some
> of the ADSI programmers out there.
>
> The following guide is for a WebSphere
> implementation
> but the average developer type should be able to
> pull
> eno
Found some info on the Web that may help some
of the ADSI programmers out there.
The following guide is for a WebSphere implementation
but the average developer type should be able to pull
enough out of it to help writing ADSI scripts for
Asterisk. Seemed to have good overview of ADSI
capabilit
Posted At: Friday, November 21, 2003 12:57 PM
Posted To: Asterisk User Group
Conversation: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI Hold
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI Hold
New to ADSI but my guess would be...
If you want Asterisk to put the call on hold
you could just program the soft keys to send the DTMF
tones
New to ADSI but my guess would be...
If you want Asterisk to put the call on hold
you could just program the soft keys to send the DTMF
tones that a regular phone would use to put the call
on hold.
If you look at the example that can with Asterisk.
(/etc/asterisk/asterisk.adsi ..I have been stari
Is there any way to program a soft key in ADSI to put a caller on hold.
Then able to retreive that caller.
Example -
Softkey Hold
Softkey Retreive Call
Softkey End Call
-gcc
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mail
In the source file for ADSI I found this:
static struct adsi_key_cmd kcmds[] = {
{ "SENDDTMF", 0, send_dtmf },
/* Encoded DTMF would go here */
{ "ONHOOK", 0x81 },
{ "OFFHOOK", 0x82 },
{ "FLASH", 0x83 },
{ "WAITDIALTONE", 0x84 },
/* Send line
Does anyone know where I can get a list of ADSI functions.. Example *70
(No Call Waiting), Flash = Flash, Hold = ???
Thank you,
-gcc
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
TDM400P
-gcc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew
Joakimsen
Posted At: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:14 PM
Posted To: Asterisk User Group
Conversation: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI - PowerTouch 350
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI
What interface is the phone connected to?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PBX
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI - PowerTouch 350
&g
I was wondering if anyone has had any experience with PowerTouch 350 &
ADSI.
I am able to configure the phone with ADSI.. Which is pretty cool in it
self. But I have a question regarding the Service feature. I have to
choose the service button and choose the Asterisk PBX ADSI. But let's
say I m
Still I cannot get ADSIprog to work, I have tried
everything.
-- Executing ADSIProg("Zap/1-1", "")
in new stack
-- ADSI Available on CPE. Attempting Upload.
== Spawn extension (co1, s, 1) exited non-zero on
'Zap/1-1'
n
Hungup 'Zap/1-1'
It hangs up right after it
You need an ADSI phone such as the nortel 350/390/480
Also, I believe you can only do this through a Zap interface, could be wrong
tho
Chad
>
> I don't have an adsi phone to test, but it should work?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
