--On Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:28 PM -0500 Andrew Kohlsmith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I thought you were wrong here, as I have Vista 390 at home and I was sure
that wasn't the case. Lo and behold one of the biggest reasons for my
wanting to go ADSI over IP has been shattered.
[...]
May
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 03:00, Ken Alker wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:28 PM -0500 Andrew Kohlsmith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I thought you were wrong here, as I have Vista 390 at home and I was sure
that wasn't the case. Lo and behold one of the biggest reasons for my
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 03:00, Ken Alker wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:28 PM -0500 Andrew Kohlsmith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I thought you were wrong here, as I have Vista 390 at home and I was
sure
that wasn't the case. Lo and behold one of the biggest reasons for
my
It made it to the US. The problem was cost. No one is willing to spend
that much money for a phone
USWest/Qwest sells ADSI (and a phone) as part of their multi-line 'home
receptionist' service, I believe.
--Justin
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
--On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 5:54 AM -0600 Steven Critchfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 03:00, Ken Alker wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:28 PM -0500 Andrew Kohlsmith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I thought you were wrong here, as I have Vista 390 at home and I
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 14:10, Ken Alker wrote:
--On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 5:54 AM -0600 Steven Critchfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 03:00, Ken Alker wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:28 PM -0500 Andrew Kohlsmith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I
Aastra will have a production PT480i SIP phone in March for ~US180-$200.
Same phone as ADSI model just SIP, but has 4 extra buttons for virtual
lines. Got a beta SIP model under test. Designed for SIP v1 v2. * is
one of PBX used for testing by development, so should be * friendly when
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, David Gomillion wrote:
Andrew wrote:
First, what's wrong with PoE? Is it any worse than installing tons of
channel banks?
Can anybody recommend a good PoE product? I am interested in getting
that implemented.
PJ
--
Wisdom is not a product of schooling but the
Probably because it's well known that these setups are prone to failure
of either the PC's connection, the phone's connection, or degredation of
one/both. It also breaks switch envirenments where spanning-tree
portfast is enabled (not as big of a deal if the deployment is in
concert
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:08:33PM -0800, PJ said:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, David Gomillion wrote:
Andrew wrote:
First, what's wrong with PoE? Is it any worse than installing tons of
channel banks?
Can anybody recommend a good PoE product? I am interested in getting
that implemented.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ray Burkholder
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 7:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone (and
proper implementation thereof)
[...]
I'm wondering
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Ted Cabeen waxed:
Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet infrastructure putting
the IP phones inline between the wall jack and the PC? There are a
number of IP phones that have builtin switch/hub that allows the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PJ
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 5:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, David Gomillion wrote:
Andrew wrote:
First
--On Monday, January 19, 2004 11:01 AM -0500 Andrew Kohlsmith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
IP phones are nice, I'll give them that... but they are also a pain in
the ass if you're upgrading/retrofiting an office, and they also don't
play well together -- you're more or less stuck using one
Do ADSI phones need wall-warts, or can they drive themselves from the
line power?
You can get dial tone on ADSI w/o a wall-wart, just like a
regular analog phone. But you need a wall-wart to give you
power for the screen and ADSI functionality, at least on the
Nortel Vista 350. Since
If I read above correctly, you imply that ADSI phones don't need
wall-warts (A/C power transformers that plug into the wall). I'd assume
that based on the sizable LCD screen, potential back-lighting,
microcontroller(s), etc, that an ADSI phone would have to have a
wall-wart, especially if
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Steven Critchfield
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
[...]
You need to be more specificPoE isn't all standard
Pretty much no. The ADSI specification was crippled from the start to
specificly not compete with PBX offerings. It has one advantage of
(very limited) programmability, but a phone like the SNOM has an
open-source core. It also has the dubious value of being interchangeable
with a regular
Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet infrastructure putting
the IP phones inline between the wall jack and the PC? There are a
number of IP phones that have builtin switch/hub that allows the PC to
daisy chain off the IP phone.
- Dustin -
I'm looking at ADSI phones simply because
- Original Message -
From: Dustin Goodwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
I'm looking at ADSI phones simply because I don't have to re-tool my
entire
building; I can use
Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet infrastructure putting
the IP phones inline between the wall jack and the PC? There are a
number of IP phones that have builtin switch/hub that allows the PC to
daisy chain off the IP phone.
To quote myself:
True, but I don't have to retool
It was my impression that these phones had 10MB ehternet connections and not
100MB. Not that most of us would notice the difference in browsing the net,
it does defeat the purpose of having 100MB switches. (I believe I also saw
people on this list talking about strange things happening when
quote who=Andrew Thompson
It was my impression that these phones had 10MB ehternet connections and not
100MB. Not that most of us would notice the difference in browsing the net,
it does defeat the purpose of having 100MB switches. (I believe I also saw
people on this list talking about
AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
I'm looking at ADSI phones simply because I don't have to re-tool my
entire
building; I can use the existing phone network and (I think) get all the
functionality I need with the (far) cheaper ADSI phones.
Why wouldn't you just use your
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dustin Goodwin
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet
(806) 722-2227
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet infrastructure
putting
the IP
Andrew wrote:
Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet infrastructure putting
the IP phones inline between the wall jack and the PC? There are a
number of IP phones that have builtin switch/hub that allows the PC to
daisy chain off the IP phone.
To quote myself:
True, but I
Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet infrastructure putting
the IP phones inline between the wall jack and the PC? There are a
number of IP phones that have builtin switch/hub that allows the PC to
daisy chain off the IP phone.
To
:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dustin Goodwin
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet
infrastructure putting
the IP phones inline between the wall jack and the PC? There are a
number of IP phones that have builtin switch/hub that allows
the PC to
daisy chain off the IP phone.
Probably
Engineer
http://www.amatechtel.com
(806) 722-2227
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
Why wouldn't you just use your existing Ethernet
problems. What did you experience?
- Dustin -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dustin Goodwin
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
Why
Assuming the price of an ADSI screen phone (say, Aastra 390) was the same
as an IP screen phone (say, Cisco 7960) and someone was setting up an *
server for their 20 employees (each of whom would have either an ADSI or IP
phone on their desk), would there be advantages to using the ADSI phones
On Sunday, 18 January, 2004 02:04, Ken Alker wrote:
Assuming the price of an ADSI screen phone (say, Aastra 390) was the same
as an IP screen phone (say, Cisco 7960) and someone was setting up an *
server for their 20 employees (each of whom would have either an ADSI or IP
phone on their
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Ulexus waxed:
On Sunday, 18 January, 2004 02:04, Ken Alker wrote:
Assuming the price of an ADSI screen phone (say, Aastra 390) was the same
as an IP screen phone (say, Cisco 7960) and someone was setting up an *
server for their 20 employees (each of whom would have
35 matches
Mail list logo
