On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 11:12:39 +0900 (JST), Isamar Maia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With so long distances, there is nothing better than G.729.
And why would G.729 be any better than iLBC or Speex.
In fact, if you have packet loss, G.729 absolutely sucks. iLBC is far
more forgiving and sound quality
On October 30, 2004 02:38 am, Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote:
And why would G.729 be any better than iLBC or Speex.
lower conversion latency? less bandwidth?
In fact, if you have packet loss, G.729 absolutely sucks. iLBC is far
more forgiving and sound quality is just as good.
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:13:02 +0200, Wilson Pickett wrote:
I've used them for calls terminating in the US with good results. I
happened to put through a call to Romania today and it seemed the
person was hearing me very much lagged behind. The actual asterisk IAX
figure given was like 80 ms which
I've used them for calls terminating in the US with good results. I
happened to put through a call to Romania today and it seemed the
person was hearing me very much lagged behind. The actual asterisk IAX
figure given was like 80 ms which is usually pretty decent for talking
to someone.
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:13:02 +0200, Wilson Pickett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've used them for calls terminating in the US with good results. I
happened to put through a call to Romania today and it seemed the
person was hearing me very much lagged behind. The actual asterisk IAX
figure given
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've used them for calls terminating in the US with good results. I
happened to put through a call to Romania today and it seemed the
person was hearing me very much lagged behind. The actual asterisk IAX
figure given was like 80 ms which is usually pretty decent
