Asterisk 0.7.1 has been released fixing a few minor bugs. Thanks again to
the bug marshalls, especially Malcolm and bkw.
Mark
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or up
Will 0.7.0/1 work with the existing zapata-0.8.0 and libpri-0.5.0, or
have they been modified as well?
TIA
Mark Spencer wrote:
Asterisk 0.7.1 has been released fixing a few minor bugs. Thanks again to
the bug marshalls, especially Malcolm and bkw.
Mark
I'm new with *
I have a question, how do I update *
Thanks
Erick
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Spencer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:50 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk
Yes it will work.
bkw
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Michael Welter wrote:
> Will 0.7.0/1 work with the existing zapata-0.8.0 and libpri-0.5.0, or
> have they been modified as well?
>
> TIA
>
> Mark Spencer wrote:
>
> > Asterisk 0.7.1 has been released fixing a few minor bugs. Thanks again to
> > the bug
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Erick Weber V. waxed:
> I'm new with *
>
> I have a question, how do I update *
>
> Thanks
In the asterisk directory: cvs update
--Chris
--
Chris Maj
Pronunciation Guide: Maj == May
Fingerprint: 43D6 799C F6CF F920 6623 DC85 C8A3 CFFE F0DE C146
http://voxilla.com/PNphpBB2-viewtopic-t150-.phtml
cheers
++dg
Erick Weber V. wrote:
I'm new with *
I have a question, how do I update *
Thanks
Erick
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-us
Actully, its: make update
cvs update doesnt update the date in the source, thus your asterisk will
allways say is was last pulled from cvs sometime last year :)
DH
C. Maj wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Erick Weber V. waxed:
I'm new with *
I have a question, how do I update *
Thanks
In t
Hi,
Since I've upgraded my * to 0.7.1 I see no new cdr's in my MySQL. Does this
new version of * only work through ODBC ? Do I have connect to MySQL through
ODBC now ?
Regards,
Dave
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digiu
Dawid Mielnik wrote:
Hi,
Since I've upgraded my * to 0.7.1 I see no new cdr's in my MySQL. Does this
new version of * only work through ODBC ? Do I have connect to MySQL through
ODBC now ?
Regards,
Dave
_
Did you rememebr to build the Asterisk-Addons??..
The MySQL support has removed from the
- Original Message -
From: "Dawid Mielnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 7:48 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk 0.7.1 - mysql
>
> Hi,
>
> Since I've upgraded my * to 0.7.1 I see no new cdr's in
WipeOut,
nope, did not build asterisk-addons
thanks..
regards,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of WipeOut
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 2:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk 0.7.1 - mysql
Dawid
On Thursday 22 January 2004 08:01, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dawid Mielnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Since I've upgraded my * to 0.7.1 I see no new cdr's in my MySQL.
> > Does this new version of * only work through ODBC ? Do I have
> > MySQL support was moved out to "addons." You don't have to use ODBC
> > to point to MySQL, but I would say it's probably a good idea. There
> > is no guarantee that anyone will continue to update the mysql code
> > now that the license on mysql has changed.
>
Can anyone explain what has chan
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Thursday 22 January 2004 08:01, Andrew Thompson wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Dawid Mielnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Since I've upgraded my * to 0.7.1 I see no new cdr's in my MySQL.
Does this new version of * only work through ODB
I would love to use native Mysql also but the whole reason I wrote
cdr_odbc is to sidestep the GPL issues and still have mysql without having
to update this and that all the time.
bkw
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote:
> Tilghman Lesher wrote:
>
> >On Thursday 22 January 2004 08:01, Andrew Thom
Jonathan Moore wrote:
MySQL support was moved out to "addons." You don't have to use ODBC
to point to MySQL, but I would say it's probably a good idea. There
is no guarantee that anyone will continue to update the mysql code
now that the license on mysql has changed.
Can anyone explain what
Tilghman,
I am glad to see I am not the only one who likes using MySQL.. :-)
I was begining to feel that I was alone in the Asterisk/MySQL world.. ;-)
PS I am only kidding...
Later..
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digi
On Thursday 22 January 2004 20:05, Warren H. Prince wrote:
> > I am glad to see I am not the only one who likes using MySQL.. :-)
> >
> > I was begining to feel that I was alone in the Asterisk/MySQL
> > world.. ;-)
>
> I'm somewhat new to * and haven't encountered the MySql connectivity.
> We use
Hi!
> I'm somewhat new to * and haven't encountered the MySql connectivity.
> We use MySql and I was wondering what is achieved by installing this addon?
See:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+billing
There are also - less established - ways to manage sip.conf,
extensions.conf and voicema
--On Friday, January 23, 2004 12:03 PM +0100 Philipp von Klitzing
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are also - less established - ways to manage sip.conf,
extensions.conf and voicemail.conf with the help of mySQL (or some other
database backend).
Any more details on this?
__
Hello all,
Per my last message to the list, and my promise to the Developers
that I'd create RPMS if they released 0.7.0, I would like to announce the
availability of experimental RPMS for Asterisk release 0.7.1. These are
targeted at RedHat 7.3 systems, running the latest Kernel release
Greg Boehnlein wrote:
Hello all,
Per my last message to the list, and my promise to the Developers
that I'd create RPMS if they released 0.7.0, I would like to announce the
availability of experimental RPMS for Asterisk release 0.7.1. These are
targeted at RedHat 7.3 systems, running the lates
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote:
> This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since it
> has already been EOL'ed by RH??
Couple of reasons..
1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and closely
mirrors the environment that a lot of people develop Aster
Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote:
This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since it
has already been EOL'ed by RH??
Couple of reasons..
1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and closely
mirrors the environment that a l
WipeOut wrote:
> Greg Boehnlein wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since
>>> it has already been EOL'ed by RH??
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Couple of reasons..
>>
>> 1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid c
Senad Jordanovic wrote:
WipeOut wrote:
I understand or agree with all of your points..
My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the "poo" by
killing off their free version and stopping support for all the free
versions as well.. I have been looking at alternatives but so far
n
WipeOut wrote:
> Senad Jordanovic wrote:
>
>> WipeOut wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I understand or agree with all of your points..
>>>
>>> My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the "poo"
>>> by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the
>>> free versions as well.. I
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Senad Jordanovic
Verzonden: donderdag 22 januari 2004 13:35
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released
WipeOut wrote:
> Senad Jordanovic wrote:
>
>> WipeOut wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I understand or
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote:
> I understand or agree with all of your points..
>
> My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the "poo" by
> killing off their free version and stopping support for all the free
> versions as well.. I have been looking at alternatives but so
my previuos message last words should be could NOT find emerge!
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens David Luyens
Verzonden: donderdag 22 januari 2004 14:37
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS
This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since it
has already been EOL'ed by RH??
Couple of reasons..
1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and closely
mirrors the environment that a lot of people develop Asterisk on. It isn't
going to drastically c
Ken Godee wrote:
This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since
it has already been EOL'ed by RH??
Couple of reasons..
1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and
closely mirrors the environment that a lot of people develop Asterisk
on. It isn't goin
On Thursday 22 January 2004 03:08, WipeOut wrote:
> My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the "poo"
> by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the
> free versions as well.. I have been looking at alternatives but so
> far nothing is going to fit the bill..
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Thursday 22 January 2004 03:08, WipeOut wrote:
My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the "poo"
by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the
free versions as well.. I have been looking at alternatives but so
far nothing is going
I am researching the use of White Box Enterprise Linux. Someone else in a
similar position with a bunch of 7.x boxes created it. He took all the SRPM
files for REL v3 and removed all the Red Hat logos and trademarks. It is the
same software as Enterprise but you can freely copy it. They also modded
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote:
> Ken Godee wrote:
>
> >>> This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since
> >>> it has already been EOL'ed by RH??
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Couple of reasons..
> >>
> >> 1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and
> >> clo
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> On Thursday 22 January 2004 03:08, WipeOut wrote:
> > My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the "poo"
> > by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the
> > free versions as well.. I have been looking at alternat
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released
> On Thursday 22 January 2004 03:08, WipeOut wrote:
> > My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the "poo"
> > by killing off
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 12:17, Jonathan Moore wrote:
> I am researching the use of White Box Enterprise Linux. Someone else in a
> similar position with a bunch of 7.x boxes created it. He took all the SRPM
> files for REL v3 and removed all the Red Hat logos and trademarks. It is the
> same software
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 18:17, Jonathan Moore wrote:
> I am researching the use of White Box Enterprise Linux. Someone else in a
> similar position with a bunch of 7.x boxes created it. He took all the SRPM
> files for REL v3 and removed all the Red Hat logos and trademarks. It is the
> same software
Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote:
Ken Godee wrote:
The problem with running servers based on RH 6.x, 7.x and 8 is that RH
is not providing errata (security specifically) updates any more.. If
you servers are not connected to the internet then, sure stay with t
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote:
> >Personal opinion here, but if you are relying on RedHat to be your
> >security provider, you have no business administering a system connected
> >to the Internet. Sure, they make it easier, but common sense and a solid
> >understanding of the applications
Neo: What are you trying to tell me? That I can dodge bullets?
Morpheus: No, Neo. I'm trying to tell you that when you're ready,
you won't have to.
There have been over 500 downloads of the RedHat Asterisk RPMS
since they were released 2 weeks ago, and I have received many comments
to i
43 matches
Mail list logo