Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk versions?

2020-05-11 Thread Joshua C. Colp
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 7:29 PM Dave Woodfall wrote: > Thanks for that info, Ben. I do like to test out the latest and most > up-to-date versions of things when I can, so I'll check those files > and see how it goes. > I'll also add that different versions have different lifetimes. A great

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk versions?

2020-05-11 Thread Dave Woodfall
Thanks for that info, Ben. I do like to test out the latest and most up-to-date versions of things when I can, so I'll check those files and see how it goes. On 2020-05-11 17:20, Ben Ford put forth the proposition: > Hey Dave, > > In the case of 13 and 16, these are LTS versions which means

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk versions?

2020-05-11 Thread Ben Ford
Hey Dave, In the case of 13 and 16, these are LTS versions which means that they get long term service. 17 is a standard release. The benefit of an LTS is that you can expect it to get bug fixes and improvements for an extended period of time without anything major being changed. If you find an

[asterisk-users] Asterisk versions?

2020-05-11 Thread Dave Woodfall
Hi all, I'm a fairly long time user of Asterisk, but I'm new to this list. I used to use the old forums some few years ago. I wanted to ask why there are different Asterisk versions, as shown by the announcements in the past week or 2: Asterisk 13.33.0 Asterisk 16.10.0 Asterisk 17.4.0 I'm

[asterisk-users] Asterisk versions supporting Path header?

2016-12-14 Thread Daniel Pocock
The bug tracker includes several issues relating to Path (RFC 3327) support. It is not clear which version actually included the patch and which versions are working. Could anybody update these issues in Jira with a brief comment about the supported versions?

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk versions and H323

2007-11-05 Thread bilal ghayyad
that is fairly simple to use. - Original Message - From: bilal ghayyad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 10:43 PM Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk versions and H323 Hi List; Is there an Asterisk version that contains H323 module

[asterisk-users] Asterisk versions and H323

2007-11-03 Thread bilal ghayyad
Hi List; Is there an Asterisk version that contains H323 module, or still I have to download the h323 alone and compile it? Regards Bilal __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk versions and H323

2007-11-03 Thread Dovid B
There is a version in the asterisk add-ons that is fairly simple to use. - Original Message - From: bilal ghayyad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 10:43 PM Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk versions and H323 Hi List

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk versions after the 1.2 release

2005-11-21 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Friends in the Asterisk community, There have been a lot of questions about Asterisk version numbers on the mailing lists. Here's a clarification: * Executive summary --- - Asterisk 1.2 = RELEASE version (previously called stable) Asterisk 1.2.0 = First release of 1.2

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk versions after the 1.2 release

2005-11-21 Thread Matt Florell
Hello, Several of us were told that there would be a 1.0.10 release as the final release of Asterisk 1.0 tree. There are several serious bugs in the 1.0 tree that have been fixed in v1-0 cvs and it would be nice to have this packaged as a release before the tree stops being accessible on the CVS

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk versions after the 1.2 release

2005-11-21 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Matt Florell wrote: Hello, Several of us were told that there would be a 1.0.10 release as the final release of Asterisk 1.0 tree. There are several serious bugs in the 1.0 tree that have been fixed in v1-0 cvs and it would be nice to have this packaged as a release before the tree stops

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk versions after the 1.2 release

2005-11-21 Thread Olle E Johansson
Matt Florell wrote: Hello, Several of us were told that there would be a 1.0.10 release as the final release of Asterisk 1.0 tree. There are several serious bugs in the 1.0 tree that have been fixed in v1-0 cvs and it would be nice to have this packaged as a release before the tree stops being

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Versions

2005-05-26 Thread Waldo Rubinstein
Hi all, Assuming 1.0.7 is the latest stable version, how/where can I find out the different CVS revisions available and a description of what has been patched/updated in each CVS revision so I can decide whether to leave my 1.0.7 installation as is, or if I need (or think I need) to

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Versions

2005-05-26 Thread Matt Riddell
Waldo Rubinstein wrote: Hi all, Assuming 1.0.7 is the latest stable version, how/where can I find out the different CVS revisions available and a description of what has been patched/updated in each CVS revision so I can decide whether to leave my 1.0.7 installation as is, or if I need

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Versions

2005-05-26 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Waldo Rubinstein wrote: Hi all, Assuming 1.0.7 is the latest stable version, how/where can I find out the different CVS revisions available and a description of what has been patched/updated in each CVS revision so I can decide whether to leave my 1.0.7 installation as is, or if I need