Does anyone know if Asterisk 13 will support T.38 Version 3?
?
Thanks
Bryant
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
Check out the new Asterisk community forum at:
Hi all
I'm trying to get asterisk 10 spandsp get faxes from 012 in israel (they use
broadsoft switches) using T.38 more reliable and would like to know if anyone
knows of any changes I could make or ask them to make.
As it stands now I get much more reliability receiving faxes with iaxmodem
I have found numerous claims that 1.8 can do T.38 gateway with a patch,
however I am yet to find the patch or any instructions on implementing it.
Anyone have a link?
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
On 1/09/2011 7:04 PM, Tim King wrote:
I have found numerous claims that 1.8 can do T.38 gateway with a
patch, however I am yet to find the patch or any instructions on
implementing it. Anyone have a link?
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=13405
--
On 11-09-01 07:04 AM, Tim King wrote:
I have found numerous claims that 1.8 can do T.38 gateway with a patch,
however I am yet to find the patch or any instructions on implementing it.
Anyone have a link?
Asterisk-10.0.0-beta1 is another option.
--
Paul Belanger
Digium, Inc. | Software
- Original Message -
On 11-09-01 07:04 AM, Tim King wrote:
I have found numerous claims that 1.8 can do T.38 gateway with a
patch,
however I am yet to find the patch or any instructions on
implementing it.
Anyone have a link?
Asterisk-10.0.0-beta1 is another option.
I've
Hi,
I've been testing the T.38 functionality in 10.0.0-beta1
with very successful results.
what about 1.8?
Will the T38 enhancement also be included in the 1.8 version?
Thanks a lot,
--
Chau y hasta luego,
Thorolf
--
_
--
On 09/01/2011 11:21 AM, Thorolf Godawa wrote:
Hi,
I've been testing the T.38 functionality in 10.0.0-beta1
with very successful results.
what about 1.8?
Will the T38 enhancement also be included in the 1.8 version?
T.38 gateway will not be included in the 1.8 releases. It was a feature
On 11-09-01 10:35 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
- Original Message -
On 11-09-01 07:04 AM, Tim King wrote:
I have found numerous claims that 1.8 can do T.38 gateway with a
patch,
however I am yet to find the patch or any instructions on
implementing it.
Anyone have a link?
Kevin P. Fleming
Envoyé : vendredi 21 août 2009 17:11
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 t 38 passthrough
BERGANZ François wrote:
I have that problem:
[Aug 21 15:57:35] WARNING[5198]: chan_sip.c:6737 get_ip_and_port_from_sdp
Hello,
How can I do t-38 passthrough with asterisk 1.6 ?
I know how to do with 1.4 but not with 1.6
Thank you
Cordialement,
P Pensez à l'Environnement, n'imprimez ce mail que si nécessaire.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation
BERGANZ François wrote:
How can I do t-38 passthrough with asterisk 1.6 ?
I know how to do with 1.4 but not with 1.6…
There is no difference, the identical configuration should work. I would
recommend using the 1.6.0.14 or 1.6.1.5 release candidates (or any later
releases) as they contain a
-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] De la part de Kevin P. Fleming
Envoyé : vendredi 21 août 2009 15:05
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 t 38 passthrough
BERGANZ François wrote:
How
BERGANZ François wrote:
When I receive a fax it is in g711
After pickup, the fax invite again with T38 in the SDP.
Have I something to insert in the dialplan or other to let the T38
passthrough ?
No.
--
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
445 Jan Davis Drive
-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] De la part de Kevin P. Fleming
Envoyé : vendredi 21 août 2009 15:31
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 t 38 passthrough
BERGANZ François wrote:
When I receive
BERGANZ François wrote:
I have that problem:
[Aug 21 15:57:35] WARNING[5198]: chan_sip.c:6737 get_ip_and_port_from_sdp:
Failed to read an alternate host or port in SDP. Expect audio problems
[Aug 21 15:57:35] WARNING[5198]: chan_sip.c:17425 handle_request_invite:
Failed to set an
Hello List.
We are having some problems using t.38 together with a Cisco voice router at
one of our providers end.
We are using the new digium asterisk fax module to generate the fax, and when
we use together with our internal Audiocodes Mediant 2000 gateways, we have no
issues what so
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Jon Schøpzinsky j...@firstcom.dk wrote:
We are having some problems using t.38 together with a Cisco voice router at
one of our providers end.
We are using the new digium asterisk fax module to generate the fax, and
when we use together with our internal
: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Emne: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 T.38 generation towards a Ciscovoice
router
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Jon Schøpzinsky j...@firstcom.dk wrote:
We are having some problems using t.38 together with a Cisco voice router at
one of our
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Jon Schøpzinsky j...@firstcom.dk wrote:
I used wireshark to debug the problem, and I can see that the cisco equipment
is correctly sending t.38 packets to asterisk, and the whole re-invite
process is successful.
The problem is, that Asterisk discards the t.38
On 10/17/07, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wasn't looking to involve Asterisk until I got it working solidly without
it. ;-)
I have yet to find on the entire internet a working example of T.38
pass-thru. I need to file a bugreport of T.38 being broken :(
On 10/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wasn't looking to involve Asterisk until I got it working solidly
without
it. ;-)
I have yet to find on the entire internet a working example of T.38
pass-thru. I need to
Hi Rafa!
Hi Jairo,
Try with other values for the jitter in your Gateway
(H323).
One customer have a scenario like this:
Phone/Fax Gateways H323 -with 16/8/2/1 Port
FXS- --- GNUGK
--- Asterisk --- Zap (E1)
We have the same configuration, and I think that our
problem is the jitter in
Hi Jairo,
Try with other values for the jitter in your Gateway (H323).
One customer have a scenario like this:
Phone/Fax Gateways H323 -with 16/8/2/1 Port FXS- --- GNUGK
--- Asterisk --- Zap (E1)
.. and only we need modified the jitter settings in two Gateways.
Rafael Gonzalez Lomeña
Hi!
I want to send fax to PSTN with Asterisk, but by now I
can't.
I am using the following boxs:
Internet Zap E1
Phone/Fax Gateway(H323)--- Asterisk--- PSTN
The gateway H323 has T38 and T30. Before I began with
Asterisk, I used Cisco to connect with PSTN,
25 matches
Mail list logo
