This is a bounty for a patch to app_hangup.c to generate an error when
Hangup is called from exten => h.
You should not call Hangup from exten => h.
The bounty is US$10 and will be paid via Paypal. The patch must be
accepted into CVS-HEAD before the bounty will be paid.
--Eric
--
Always do rig
On April 14, 2005 08:31 am, Eric Wieling wrote:
> This is a bounty for a patch to app_hangup.c to generate an error when
> Hangup is called from exten => h.
>
> You should not call Hangup from exten => h.
I disagree; you should use Hangup() WHEREEVER you want to make absolutely sure
the dialplan
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On April 14, 2005 08:31 am, Eric Wieling wrote:
This is a bounty for a patch to app_hangup.c to generate an error when
Hangup is called from exten => h.
You should not call Hangup from exten => h.
I disagree; you should use Hangup() WHEREEVER you want to make absolutely sur
On April 14, 2005 09:42 am, Eric Wieling wrote:
> exten => h will not be called unless the channel has ALREADY hung up.
I understand that, which is why I'm still suggesting a WARNING and not an
error.
Something like "No need to execute Hangup from the h exten, line is already
hung up"
-A.
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On April 14, 2005 09:42 am, Eric Wieling wrote:
exten => h will not be called unless the channel has ALREADY hung up.
I understand that, which is why I'm still suggesting a WARNING and not an
error.
Something like "No need to execute Hangup from the h exten, line is alrea
