Shidan wrote:
But, when you imply "that's your problem because it wasn't
documented", I would really like to know where this official
documentation is apart from reading the source code. Most successful
Asterisk based operations are novel and creative hacks, not structured
formulas that follow a
> It was _never_ documented that you could skip a numeric parameter for
> the substring functionality and expect it to work properly. If it did,
> you got lucky. When it stopped, you got unlucky.
Apart from the source code and its comments whats the official
"documentation of Astreisk.
I know the
I was never read documentation about that substring functionality. I was
(once upon a time) just thinking about how can I extract first 3 digits
from CALLERIDNUM, and what appears logical to me is that I should try
CALLERIDNUM::3
Guess what, it's worked! That was the first idea that come in to my
Pisac wrote:
But I'm dissapointed with all this minor & needless & problematic
changes which needlessly spending my time. I will realy double rethink
in the future about upgrading any tuned system to new Asterisk release.
It was _never_ documented that you could skip a numeric parameter for
t
Yes, you are right, it's working.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Ringwald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Pisac wrote:
> > Sorry, I use correct syntax in dialplan, but here in e-mail I maked
this
> > mistake.
> > In dialplan I'm using ${CALLERIDNUM::3}
>
> Just for grins, have you trie
I'm using Asterisk 1.2.1-BRIstuffed-0.3.0-PRE-1f
Your answer was helpfull, it's working now like it used before.
But I'm dissapointed with all this minor & needless & problematic
changes which needlessly spending my time. I will realy double rethink
in the future about upgrading any tuned system
> So,
> if
> ${CALLERIDNUM}=0123456789
> Then
> ${CALLERIDNUM:3} returns 3456789
> ${CALLERDINUM::3} returns 012
> ${CALLERIDNUM:3:3} returns 345
> But this do not work anymore in 1.2.1, and if I do not found
> solution for this I will downgrade to 1.0.9
Have you tried ${CALLERID(number)::3} ? I
Pisac wrote:
Sorry, I use correct syntax in dialplan, but here in e-mail I maked this
mistake.
In dialplan I'm using ${CALLERIDNUM::3}
Just for grins, have you tried
${CALLERIDNUM:0:3}
I have always found it better to explicitly specify what to do, rather than relying on a function's assump
On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 14:49 +0100, Pisac wrote:
> I maked mistake in my previous e-mail, but in my dialplan I didn't make
> this mistake. So, my intention in previous e-mail was to write:
>
> ${CALLERIDNUM:3} erase first 3 digits
> ${CALLERIDNUM::3} returns first 3 digits
> ${CALLERIDNUM:3:3} shou
I maked mistake in my previous e-mail, but in my dialplan I didn't make
this mistake. So, my intention in previous e-mail was to write:
${CALLERIDNUM:3} erase first 3 digits
${CALLERIDNUM::3} returns first 3 digits
${CALLERIDNUM:3:3} should erase first 3 digits and return next 3 digits
So,
if
${C
Sorry, I use correct syntax in dialplan, but here in e-mail I maked this
mistake.
In dialplan I'm using ${CALLERIDNUM::3}
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor G. Hammonds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You are using incorrect syntax. Notice where the close bracket is
placed,
> using your exampl
You are using incorrect syntax. Notice where the close bracket is placed,
using your examples:
${CALLERIDNUM:3} erase first 3 digits
${CALLERIDNUM::3} returns first 3 digits
${CALLERIDNUM:3:3} should erase first 3 digits and return next 3 digits
Pisac wrote on Saturday, 14 January 2006 5:10 AM
No,
${CALLERIDNUM}:3 erase first 3 digits
${CALLERIDNUM}::3 returns first 3 digits
${CALLERIDNUM}:3:3 should erase first 3 digits and return next 3 digits
So,
if
${CALLERIDNUM}=0123456789
Then
${CALLERIDNUM}:3 returns 3456789
${CALLERDINUM}::3 returns 012
${CALLERIDNUM}:3:3 returns 345
But this d
On 01/14/06 11:09 Pisac said the following:
But, it's not working anymore in Asterisk 1.2.1
when I test this with
noop(${CALLERIDNUM::3})
I get full callerid, not just first 3 numbers like it use to be on 1.0.9
i believe the syntax is ${CALLERIDNUM:3} and not as you're using it with
double c
I upgraded from 1.0.9, to 1.2.1.
I was using this line
exten => s,1,gotoif($[${CALLERIDNUM::3} = 066]?mycity,1:other,1)
it selecting calls if callerid begins with some number pattern (from
some city)
But, it's not working anymore in Asterisk 1.2.1
when I test this with
noop(${CALLERIDNUM::3})
I g
15 matches
Mail list logo
